ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03769649Updated Jun 8, 2022Results posted

Clinical Evaluation of CelluTite Treatment

An interventional study of CelluTite in Cellulite of Thighs, sponsored by InMode MD Ltd.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-08.

Sponsored by InMode MD Ltd. (part of InMode Ltd.) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective study is intended to evaluate the CelluTite RFAL handpiece combined with Morpheus8 handpiece for the treatment of cellulite.

Read the detailed description

The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cellulite treatment using two hand pieces:

  • The CelluTite - based on a minimally invasive, temperature-controlled Radiofrequency-assisted lipolysis (RFAL) technology. RF energy is applied using a handpiece with 2 electrodes: internal active electrode with spatula-shaped tip and external electrode.
  • The Morpheus8 - designed to deliver RF energy to the skin surface in a fractional manner via an array of 24-electrode pins.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulite of Thighs

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cellulite

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulite; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 34 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Cellulite.

Browse Cellulite studies →

Lead sponsor

InMode MD Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female subjects aged 18-70 having mild/moderate grade cellulites.
  • The patients should understand the information provided about the treatment, possible benefits and side effects, and sign the Form, (including the permission to use photography).
  • The patients should be willing to comply with the study procedure and schedule, including the follow up visit, and will refrain from using any other aesthetic treatment methods in the treatment area for the last 6 months and during the entire study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body fat layer thinner than 5mm.
  • Pacemaker or internal defibrillator, or any other active electrical implant anywhere in the body.
  • Superficial permanent implant in the treated area such as metal plates and screws, metal piercing, silicone implants or an injected chemical substance.
  • Current or history of skin cancer (remission of 5 years), or current condition of any other type of cancer, or pre-malignant moles.
  • Severe concurrent conditions, such as cardiac disorders, epilepsy, uncontrolled hypertension, and liver or kidney diseases.
  • Pregnancy and nursing.
  • History of bleeding coagulopathies or use of anticoagulants.
  • Impaired immune system due to diseases such as AIDS and or use of immunosuppressive medications.
  • Poorly controlled endocrine disorders, such as diabetes or thyroid dysfunction and hormonal virilization.
  • Any active condition in the treatment area, such as sores, psoriasis, eczema, and rash.
  • History of skin disorders, keloids, abnormal wound healing, as well as very dry and fragile skin.
  • Use of Isotretinoin (Accutane®) within 6 months prior to treatment.
  • Any surgery or treatment such as laser or chemicals in treated area within 3-6 months prior to treatment or before complete healing.
  • Allergies, in particular to anesthesia.
  • Mental disorders such as Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD).
  • As per the practitioner's discretion, refrain from treating any condition that might make it unsafe for the patient.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment arm

    Subjects receive CelluTite treatment followed by Morpheus8 treatment

    Device: CelluTite

Interventions

  • DeviceCelluTite

    CelluTite: Radiofrequency-assisted lipolysis (RFAL) Morpheus8: Fractional RF

    Also known as: Morpheus8

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

    Photos from 6 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

    Photos from 6 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

    Photos from 1month follow-up visits will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

    Photos from 3 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

    Photos 1 month follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 1 month

  7. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

    Photos 3 month follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

    Photos 1 week follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 1 week

  9. Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

    Photos from 1 week ollow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

    Time frame: 1 week

  10. Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

    Time frame: 1 month

  12. Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

    Time frame: 1 week

  13. Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

    Time frame: Treatment Day

  14. Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

    Time frame: 6 Months

  15. Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months

  16. Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 1 week

  17. Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

    Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Treatment Day

07

Results

Posted Feb 16, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment Arm
Started15
Completed11
Not completed4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

Photos from 6 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)2.45 ± 1.04
PrimaryAssessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)0 ± 0
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

Photos from 6 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)2.64 ± 0.92
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

Photos from 1month follow-up visits will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)2.89 ± 0.93
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

Photos from 3 months follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)2.82 ± 0.87
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

Photos 1 month follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)2.6 ± 1.07
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

Photos 3 month follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)2.64 ± 0.81
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)

Photos 1 week follow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating cellulite dimples, in which a dimple is an isolated circular or oval-shaped depression on the surface of the skin. (A) Score 0 (no dimples); (B) score 1 (1 dimple); (C) score 2 (2 dimples); (D) score 3 (3 dimples); (E) score 4 (4 or more dimples). Higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)1.9 ± 0.99
PrimaryChange in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)

Photos from 1 week ollow-up visit will be evaluated. Evaluation goals are rating the degree of cellulite according to the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS). Scale for evaluating contour irregularities. The irregularities become more severe as more concavity and convexity occur in the linear undulations. Score 0-none-no depressions ; score 1 superficial: generalized, small depressions with no protuberances; score 2 mild: pattern of mild linear undulations; score 3 moderate: pattern of moderate linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions; score 4 severe: severe generalized linear undulations with alternating areas of protuberances and depressions. higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Change in Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)2 ± 0.82
PrimaryAssessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity0 ± 0
PrimaryAssessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity0 ± 0
PrimaryAssessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity0.08 ± 0.27
PrimaryAssessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

Time frame:
Treatment Day
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity0.2 ± 0.41
PrimaryAssessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)0 ± 0
PrimaryAssessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Evaluations will be done based on severity (none 0, mild 1, moderate 2 or severe 3).

Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity
score on a scaleTreatment Arm
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurrence Based on Severity0 ± 0
PrimaryAssessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)0 ± 0
PrimaryAssessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)0.16 ± 0.55
PrimaryAssessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)

Safety will be evaluated by observation, assessment and recording of adverse events, if occur. Casualty: relationship to the device or the treatment 0 - no adverse event, 1 - not related and 2 - related to device). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Treatment Day
Reported as:
Mean · score
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)
scoreTreatment Arm
Assessment of Occurrence of Adverse Events Based on Causality (Relationship to the Device or the Treatment)0.4 ± 0.8

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected over a period of 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Arm0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)4/15 (26.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Arm
PainSurgical and medical procedures4/15

Baseline characteristics

Only subjects that finished all visits were analyzed

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment Arm
Mean50.62 ± 8.83
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment Arm
Female11
Male0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Treatment Arm
White Non-Hispanic7
Hispanic or Latino3
Biracial1
Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)
Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Dimples)(score on a scale)Treatment Arm
Mean3.45 ± 0.69
Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)
Cellulite Score Rated According to Cellulite Severity Scale (Contour)(score on a scale)Treatment Arm
Mean3.55 ± 0.69
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Juva
    New York, New York 10022, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2021, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Cellulite, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 14. This study's 14 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 4, 2018
First posted
Dec 7, 2018
StartActual
Nov 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 17, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 17, 2020
Results first posted
Feb 16, 2021
Last update
Jun 8, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03769649
Lead sponsor
InMode MD Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2018
Start date
Nov 12, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 17, 2020
Completion
Jan 17, 2020
Results posted
Feb 16, 2021
Last update
Jun 8, 2022

Study contacts

Bruce Katz, MD
principal investigator · 60 E 56th St #2, New York, NY 10022, USA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion