CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03769519ARICAUpdated Dec 17, 2021Results posted

AdheRence to Inhaled Corticosteroids in Asthma

An interventional study of ARICA in Medication Adherence and Asthma, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-17.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is widely recognized that asthma in adult African American patients is a significant health problem, which is partly affected by relatively low inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence rates. The goal of this study is to pilot test an ICS adherence intervention, ARICA, that aims to improve ICS adherence in adult African Americans.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will evaluate ARICA in Duke primary care clinics to study its feasibility and acceptability using a quasi-experimental pre-post study design. The study will enroll between 32 and 48 adult African Americans with persistent asthma and suboptimal ICS adherence, and their health care providers, to study the use of the intervention and key indicators of the intervention's potential effectiveness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medication Adherence
  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • health disparities
  • african american
  • adult
03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 83 across 2,752 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Self-identifying African American
  • Self-reported current asthma
  • Prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (alone or combination) for ≥ 1 month
  • Presented at a Duke Primary Care clinic visit within the past 3 years or is establishing care at Duke Primary Care
  • Follow up Duke Primary Care visit within the next 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control (Group 1)

    This group is considered the control group. This group will have scheduled texts and emails for the monthly surveys after the participant completes the baseline questionnaires.

  • Experimental
    ARICA Intervention (Group 2)

    This group is considered the intervention group. Participants in this group will receive weekly texts and emails containing asthma facts and myths. They will also complete monthly surveys and participate in asthma education sessions.

    Behavioral: ARICA

Interventions

  • BehavioralARICA

    Personalized ARICA (AdheRence to Inhaled Corticosteroids in Asthma) intervention package.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Reported Experiences With the ARICA Program

    Assessment of participants experiences with and perceptions of the ARICA program, as assessed by in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Patient Reported Medication Adherence as Measured by the DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils) Questionnaire

    patients' medication adherence rates based on Voils adherence questionnaire adherence questionnaire. Difference from baseline to follow up. Scored 0-4, higher is more non-adherent

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in Asthma Control as Measured by the Asthma Control Test

    patient reported difference from baseline to follow up. Higher score is better asthma control. Range 5-25.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Change in Asthma-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the Marks Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Patient reported. Difference from baseline to follow up. Range 0-80, higher score means greater impact of asthma on quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)
Started1415
Completed1414
Not completed01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Experiences With the ARICA Program

Assessment of participants experiences with and perceptions of the ARICA program, as assessed by in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Experiences With the ARICA Program
ParticipantsControl (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)
Number of Participants Who Reported Experiences With the ARICA Program—12
SecondaryChange in Patient Reported Medication Adherence as Measured by the DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils) Questionnaire

patients' medication adherence rates based on Voils adherence questionnaire adherence questionnaire. Difference from baseline to follow up. Scored 0-4, higher is more non-adherent

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Patient Reported Medication Adherence as Measured by the DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils) Questionnaire
score on a scaleControl (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)
Change in Patient Reported Medication Adherence as Measured by the DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils) Questionnaire0.685 (-0.0385 to 0.7528)0.738 (0.1928 to 1.28)
SecondaryChange in Asthma Control as Measured by the Asthma Control Test

patient reported difference from baseline to follow up. Higher score is better asthma control. Range 5-25.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Asthma Control as Measured by the Asthma Control Test
score on a scaleControl (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)
Change in Asthma Control as Measured by the Asthma Control Test-2.571 (-5.1902 to 0.0473)-3.5 (-6.0396 to -0.9604)
SecondaryChange in Asthma-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the Marks Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire

Patient reported. Difference from baseline to follow up. Range 0-80, higher score means greater impact of asthma on quality of life.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Asthma-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the Marks Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire
score on a scaleControl (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)
Change in Asthma-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the Marks Asthma-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire5.769 (-1.2527 to 12.7912)11.462 (5.5068 to 17.4163)

Adverse events

Collected over Study period, 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control (Group 1)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)
ARICA Intervention (Group 2)1/15 (6.7%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Mean52.7 ± 12.247.1 ± 10.549.8 ± 11.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Female131427
Male112
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino131528
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American131427
White000
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
United States141529
DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils Adherence)
DOSE-Nonadherence (Voils Adherence)(units on a scale)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Mean1.6 ± 0.91.3 ± 11.5 ± 1
Asthma Control Test
Asthma Control Test(units on a scale)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Mean14 ± 5.516.1 ± 415.1 ± 4.8
Marks Asthma Related Quality of Life
Marks Asthma Related Quality of Life(units on a scale)Control (Group 1)ARICA Intervention (Group 2)Total
Mean33.2 ± 17.723.2 ± 17.228 ± 17.9
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke Un.
    Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 14, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03769519
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2018
Start date
Feb 27, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2020
Completion
Aug 19, 2020
Results posted
Dec 17, 2021
Last update
Dec 17, 2021

Study contacts

Isaretta L Riley, MD
principal investigator · Duke Un.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion