ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03747445Updated Jun 11, 2021

Microstructural Analysis of Ingestive Behavior After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass - Pilot

An observational study in Meal, Obesity, Morbid and Food Deprivation, sponsored by Marco Bueter. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Marco Bueter · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The ability to assess ingestion in fine detail over the time course of a liquid meal allows for comparison of early and late meal features of drinking and may help dissociate manipulations (surgical, neural, pharmacological, etc.) that affect orosensory properties from those that are modulating postoral processes in the control of intake.

The aim of the study is to asses microstructural changes in liquid meal intake over 1-year in severely obese patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

Read the detailed description

Introduction

Bariatric surgery (BS) is currently the most effective treatment of severe obesity. BS has a pleiotropic effect on the body, involving changes in basic metabolic rate, gut hormone and bile acid levels, intestinal nerve signaling and microbiota composition. Overall, patients report to eat less, to feel less hungry and they often change their taste preferences. Initial insights on food intake and appetite can be provided by indirect measures such as verbal report of energy intake, food diaries, and dietary recall questionnaires. However, indirect measures are vulnerable to inaccuracy and, at best, only offer an estimate of the target behavior. Such methodological limitations can be improved by complementing existing findings with direct measures of feeding and drinking. There are only very few studies to date that have applied direct measures of ingestive behavior in BS patients. These studies focused mainly on macronutrient composition within a cafeteria diet and on some motivational aspects of appetite behavior. This might be due to the fact that the assessment of the temporal organization of ingestive behavior within a meal in humans poses significant methodological and conceptual challenges to researchers and study design. The investigators have recently developed and validated a novel drinkometer for humans, which may have great utility in investigations of the specific behavioral variables that underlie the dysregulation of appetite control in morbid obesity, and also to specify neural effects of various medical or surgical weight-loss interventions.

The aim of this exploratory pilot study is to observe the ingestive microstructure of a liquid meal intake before and several occasions after RYGB. Observed values may serve as basis for designing future observational studies in the field of obesity research.

Methods

Prospective observational controlled cohort pilot study in severely obese patients scheduled for RYGB. 11 patients and 10 normal-weight controls will be recruited to consume a calorically dense standardized refrigerated liquid meal (product: Resource 2.0+fibre, Nestle, Vevey, Switzerland) in a food deprived state, until reaching satiety. The novel drinkometer will be used to measure ingestive microstructure and overall intake, and anthropometric parameters (weight, height) will be measured as well. Visual analogue scales will be used to assess self-reported hunger, thirst, fullness, taste preference and participants will estimate their intake at the end of each session. Time points for patients: pre-operatively, postoperative 1 week, 1-3-6-12 months. Time points for control group: baseline, 1-3-12 months. Due to major differences in ingestive microstructure, only female participants will be included in the study.

Satistical analysis

The drinkometer data will be processed and filtered by an in-house developed algorithm in Matlab 2017 software. Results will be analysed using descriptive statistics, as well as ANOVA, t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank test in R software version 3.5.1.

Potential outcomes

Any comprehensive understanding of how BS affects food intake requires a detailed analysis of the ingestive behavior itself, not simply the measurement of the outcome of the behavior. In other words, the information on how the food is consumed is equally or even more important than the information on how much food has been ingested. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that drinking microstructure in humans will be recorded and analyzed after BS. Results will inform on the range of values that can be observed in this patient population and will serve as a basis to accurately power future studies in this field. Further, this exploratory study may generate hypothesis on behavioral changes that occur following BS. Any treatment that affects total intake - e.g. BS - can be entirely viewed as function of its single components such as size and number of sucking bursts which then can provide relevant information e.g. on the motivational aspects of the ingestive behavior. The investigators expect to find no difference in the ingestive behavior between patients before and after RYGB and in comparison to lean controls when the high-sugar high-fat stimulus is consumed for the first time. The investigators also do not expect an effect of RYGB on the number of sucking events within the first minute of the test session. As initial suck rate reflects the consummatory behavior in response to a given stimulus and thus indicate the initial motivational state toward this stimulus, the lack of RYGB-induced changes in this microstructural parameter would suggest that RYGB does not change the palatability of the stimulus. In line with this, the investigators further expect that suck rate during consumption of the fluid will decrease as a function of meal progress and with progressing postoperative time in patients after RYGB, but not in lean controls. Regardless of which outcomes are obtained, this innovative experiment will be a critical and a novel test of the explicit experience of humans with a high-sugar high-fat liquid meal after RYGB and its potential role for the understanding possible mechanisms determining postoperative outcomes, such as weight loss.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meal
  • Obesity, Morbid
  • Food Deprivation
  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass
  • Ingestive Microstructure
  • Drinking Behavior
  • Drinkometer
03

In context

Obesity, Morbid

941 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 80 across 311 observational studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

Marco Bueter is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult females with severe obesity and scheduled to undergo RYGB

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ability to provide inform consent
  • treatment group: scheduled for RYGB for severe obesity
  • control group: normal weight, healthy general condition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lactose intolerance
  • diabetes
  • pregnancy / lactation
  • use of weight-loss medication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients

    severely obese non-diabetic adult female patients scheduled for RYGB

    Procedure: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Normal weight controls

    normal weight healthy non-diabetic adult females

  • Obese controls

    Severely obese non-diabetic adult female patients not scheduled for RYGB

Interventions

  • ProcedureRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

    laparoscopic surgical procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in microstructure of ingestive behavior of 1 liquid meal

    recording of meal intake by the drinkometer

    Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 1-3-6-12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in self-reported hunger, thirst, fullness, taste preference, estimated consumption

    visual analogue scale (0-100 mm, higher number refer to stronger feeling/higher liking)

    Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 1-3-6-12 months

  2. body mass index

    weight/height measurements

    Time frame: baseline, 1 week, 1-3-6-12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich
    Zürich, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gero D, File B, Justiz J, Steinert RE, Frick L, Spector AC, Bueter M. Drinking microstructure in humans: A proof of concept study of a novel drinkometer in healthy adults. Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 1. PubMed 30179650 ↗
  • Gero D, Steinert RE, le Roux CW, Bueter M. Do Food Preferences Change After Bariatric Surgery? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):38. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0674-x. PubMed 28779431 ↗
  • Mathes CM, Bohnenkamp RA, Blonde GD, Letourneau C, Corteville C, Bueter M, Lutz TA, le Roux CW, Spector AC. Gastric bypass in rats does not decrease appetitive behavior towards sweet or fatty fluids despite blunting preferential intake of sugar and fat. Physiol Behav. 2015 Apr 1;142:179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PubMed 25660341 ↗
  • Spector AC, Klumpp PA, Kaplan JM. Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat. Behav Neurosci. 1998 Jun;112(3):678-94. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.112.3.678. PubMed 9676983 ↗
  • Johnson AW. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2018 Feb;64:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 3. PubMed 28684308 ↗
  • Gero D, File B, Alceste D, Frick LD, Serra M, Ismaeil AE, Steinert RE, Spector AC, Bueter M. Microstructural changes in human ingestive behavior after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass during liquid meals. JCI Insight. 2021 Aug 9;6(15):e136842. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.136842. PubMed 34369388 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2018, 4 months.

Of 137 non-industry observational studies under Obesity, Morbid, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 132. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 138 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 132.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2018
First posted
Nov 20, 2018
StartActual
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2020
Last update
Jun 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03747445
Lead sponsor
Marco Bueter
Collaborators
Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Responsible party
Marco Bueter (Assistant Professor, PhD, Head of Bariatric Program, University of Zurich) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2018
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2018
Completion
Sep 30, 2020
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Marco Bueter, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Zürich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion