ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03440138BBenchmarksUpdated Sep 19, 2019

Defining Benchmarks in Bariatric Surgery

An observational study in Benchmark, Bariatric Surgery and Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass, sponsored by Marco Bueter. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-19.

Sponsored by Marco Bueter · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
5,741
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: To define benchmark outcomes in minimally-invasive primary bariatric surgery.

Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Assessed outcomes: Morbidity as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications, the Comprehensive Complication Index® (CCI®) at discharge, at 3 months and at latest follow-up. Evolution of body mass index (BMI) will be also analyzed.

Hospital eligibility: High volume centers (> 200 bariatric operations per year) from at least three continents, maintaining a prospective database, as well as having published previously critically on their outcome.

Study population: Adult patients who underwent primary minimally invasive (laparoscopic / robotic) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy from 1st of June 2012 to 31st of May 2017.

Patient Exclusion criteria: detailed later.

Data collection Deadline: 1st September 2017 - 30 April 2018

Read the detailed description

Background With the growing complexity and cost of modern surgical practice, quality assessment becomes mandatory. The notion of quality and quality assessment is widely recognized and used in the world of business and manufacturing. A possible tool of quality assessment is benchmarking. Benchmarking is a process of measuring performance by comparison to the outcomes achieved by the best "service provider" in a specific domain. Usually, a benchmark describes the ''best possible'' outcome of a benchmarking subject to whom comparison can be performed. In the surgical community, however, such benchmarks - best possible outcomes - for specific procedures, not just the pooled overall performance, are lacking.

In 2016, a first landmark study defining benchmark outcomes for liver resection was published in Annals of Surgery by a group of international authors invited and guided by our department. More recently, further surgical outcomes (liver transplantation, minimally invasive esophagectomy) have been benchmarked and have been accepted for publication.

Since laparoscopic bariatric surgery has become a standardized and widely performed procedure worldwide, quality assessment is of major importance. To identify the best possible outcomes (i.e. the benchmarks), data from high-volume centers (based on official IFSO criteria) in low risk patients will be analyzed. These benchmarks will serve as "optimal outcomes" for comparison with single center outcomes, high-risk patients and future developments.

Aim The primary aim is to define benchmark outcomes based on assessment of post procedural complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications and the comprehensive complication index CCI™ at discharge and at 90-days. The CCI® expresses morbidity on a continuous numeric scale from 0 (no complications) to 100 (death) by weighing all postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification for their respective severity. Secondary outcome measure are patient survival and excess BMI loss (EBMIL).

Data Security This multicenter international study is designed to harvest prospectively collected retrospective data via an encrypted (i.e. Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol) online platform (https://bbenchmarks.org/) that meets Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards and is accessible only by secured login membership.

Confidential center specific data: Centers' outcomes will be individually analyzed in a first step to screen for center-specific differences. Benchmarks will be computed from each center's results in a second step. No center-specific data will be published. Instead, all complications or adverse outcomes will be anonymously reported, as fractions of the total study population. Each center, of course, will be free to publish their own data, as they wish.

Further use of cohort data: Future studies based on the collected data may emerge from this multicenter study, such as comparing outcomes in patients with or without specific comorbidities with benchmark outcomes. For further data usage, additional ethics approval may be required.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benchmark
  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass
  • Sleeve Gastrectomy
  • Complications
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Marco Bueter is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with severe obesity with a lower risk profile who undergo bariatric surgery

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients of 18-65 years
  • Low risk profile (please read "exclusion criteria"),
  • Maximum preoperative of 50 kg/m2
  • Primary laparoscopic/robotic proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy
  • Documented follow-up of at least 90 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open surgery
  • Previous intra-abdominal surgery (including previous bariatric surgery)
  • Pre-operative over 50 kg/m2
  • Age over 65 years
  • Cardiovascular disease (e.g. cardiac arrhythmia, stroke, coronary artery disease) (Hypertension is allowed)
  • History of thromboembolic events and/or therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Diabetes mellitus (Type I and Type II, as defined by the American Diabetes Association)
  • Obstructive sleep apnea (recurrent episodes of upper airway collapse during sleep)
  • (/FVC\<0.7)
  • Chronic kidney disease ( \< 30ml/min/1.72 m2)
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's)
  • therapy (e.g. , calcineurin inhibitors, etc)
  • Patients who underwent associated procedures (for example: cholecystectomy, hiatoplasty, liver )
  • > 2
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
5,741 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • University Hospital Zurich

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • St Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • AZ Sint-Jan Hospital in Bruges, Belgium

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Bristol

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Cleveland Clinic, Weston, Florida, USA

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, Sao Paolo, Brazil

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Brown University, Providence Rhode Island

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Fresno Bariatric, CA, USA

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • CHU Nice, France

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Claraspital Basel, Switzerland

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Gastro-Obeso-Center Advanced Med Inst, Brazil

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Hospital Dipreca Santiago Región Metropolitana , Chile

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

  • Medical University Wien, Austria

    Procedure: bariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

Interventions

  • Procedurebariatric surgery (RYGB or SG)

    laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Benchmark outcomes (best achievable outcomes after bariatric surgery)

    Comprehensive Complication Index (http://www.assessurgery.com/calculator_single/)

    Time frame: 30 days postoperatively

  2. Benchmark outcomes (best achievable outcomes after bariatric surgery)

    Comprehensive Complication Index (http://www.assessurgery.com/calculator_single/)

    Time frame: 90 days postoperatively

  3. Benchmark outcomes (best achievable outcomes after bariatric surgery)

    Comprehensive Complication Index (http://www.assessurgery.com/calculator_single/)

    Time frame: 180 days postoperatively

  4. Major complications after bariatric surgery

    Clavien-Dindo grade \> IIIa

    Time frame: 30 days postoperatively

  5. Major complications after bariatric surgery

    Clavien-Dindo grade \> IIIa

    Time frame: 90 days postoperatively

  6. Major complications after bariatric surgery

    Clavien-Dindo grade \> IIIa

    Time frame: 180 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Case-mix within centers

    proportion of benchmark cases

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Excess weight loss after bariatric surgery

    Body-mass index (kg/m2)

    Time frame: 1-year postoperatively

  3. Excess weight loss after bariatric surgery

    Body-mass index (kg/m2)

    Time frame: 3-years postoperatively

  4. Excess weight loss after bariatric surgery

    Body-mass index (kg/m2)

    Time frame: 5-years postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich
    Zürich, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rossler F, Sapisochin G, Song G, Lin YH, Simpson MA, Hasegawa K, Laurenzi A, Sanchez Cabus S, Nunez MI, Gatti A, Beltrame MC, Slankamenac K, Greig PD, Lee SG, Chen CL, Grant DR, Pomfret EA, Kokudo N, Cherqui D, Olthoff KM, Shaked A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Lerut J, Troisi RI, De Santibanes M, Petrowsky H, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery: A multicenter Analysis of 5202 Living Liver Donors. Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):492-500. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001849. PubMed 27433909 ↗
  • Muller X, Marcon F, Sapisochin G, Marquez M, Dondero F, Rayar M, Doyle MMB, Callans L, Li J, Nowak G, Allard MA, Jochmans I, Jacskon K, Beltrame MC, van Reeven M, Iesari S, Cucchetti A, Sharma H, Staiger RD, Raptis DA, Petrowsky H, de Oliveira M, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Pinna AD, Lerut J, Polak WG, de Santibanes E, de Santibanes M, Cameron AM, Pirenne J, Cherqui D, Adam RA, Ericzon BG, Nashan B, Olthoff K, Shaked A, Chapman WC, Boudjema K, Soubrane O, Paugam-Burtz C, Greig PD, Grant DR, Carvalheiro A, Muiesan P, Dutkowski P, Puhan M, Clavien PA. Defining Benchmarks in Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Outcome Analysis Determining Best Achievable Results. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):419-425. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002477. PubMed 28885508 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732. PubMed 23728278 ↗
  • Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, van Veldhuisen SL, Martin AS, Xiao Y, Galvao M, Giorgi M, Benois M, Espinoza F, Hollyman M, Lloyd A, Hosa H, Schmidt H, Garcia-Galocha JL, van de Vrande S, Chiappetta S, Menzo EL, Aboud CM, Luthy SG, Orchard P, Rothe S, Prager G, Pournaras DJ, Cohen R, Rosenthal R, Weiner R, Himpens J, Torres A, Higa K, Welbourn R, Berry M, Boza C, Iannelli A, Vithiananthan S, Ramos A, Olbers T, Sepulveda M, Hazebroek EJ, Dillemans B, Staiger RD, Puhan MA, Peterli R, Bueter M. Defining Global Benchmarks in Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Minimally Invasive Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):859-867. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003512. PubMed 31592894 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — the study is based on de-anonymised data, so it is impossible to backtrack it to a patient. only overall data will be shared, not individual data

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03440138
Lead sponsor
Marco Bueter
Collaborators
Dr. med. Daniel Gero, Dr. med. Dimitri A. Raptis, PhD, Dr. med. Henner Schmidt
Responsible party
Marco Bueter (Prof. Dr. med., PhD, University of Zurich) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
Oct 17, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2018
Completion
Sep 17, 2019
Last update
Sep 19, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion