A Phase 3 interventional study of meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine in Meningitis and Meningococcal, sponsored by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in Gambia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-11.
Sponsored by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants receive a single dose of the meningococcal serogroup A-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac, when they reach at least 9 months of age. However, this leaves a window of susceptibility in early life when the incidence of invasive serogroup A disease, and the case fatality rate for the condition is at its highest. This study will investigate the potential role of administering the vaccine to expectant mothers at the start of the third trimester of pregnancy in order to protect their subsequent borne infants. Antibody transfer to the newborn and subsequent antibody decay will be measured. The level of protection against neonatal tetanus provided by the tetanus toxoid component of the vaccine, when compared to the routine dose of tetanus administered in pregnancy will also be assessed.
As a separate exploratory study, the follow-up of the cohort planned will also be used to investigate the effects that the development of the gastrointestinal microbiome, and any perturbations in the microbiome caused by antibiotic use, have on immune development and vaccine immunogenicity over the first 10 months of life.
MenAfriVac is a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A Men A polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine which was developed within the space of just nine years through the Meningitis Vaccine Project. Although the effectiveness of the vaccine is well established, the optimum strategy for maintaining protection following the mass vaccination campaigns has yet to be determined. However, in mathematical models, even considering a coverage rate of as low as 60 percent, the routine administration of MenAfriVac nine-months results in a lower annual disease incidence than regular campaigns targeting one to four year old children. Thus, the introduction of a single dose of MenAfriVac® at nine to 18 months in meningitis belt has subsequently been recommended by the WHO.
An important limitation of such a regimen is that infants are left without direct protection against Men A infection up to the age of at least nine months. While not classically considered to be a disease of early infancy, the incidence of invasive Men A infection is as high or higher in this age group as compared to the incidence in older children and the case fatality rate is also at its peak under the age of one. Recent mass vaccination campaigns rapidly achieved exceptionally high levels of coverage across the entire one to 29 year old adult population and have resulted in herd protection and reduced level of invasive disease in those under one year of age. However, such levels of herd protection cannot be assumed following routine scheduling at nine months of age and thus alternative strategies both to protect the infant up to nine months of age and also to boost herd protection in the population warrant exploration.
Maternal immunization represents a potentially attractive option with both regards. The safety of the vaccine when administered in pregnancy has been assessed through comparing the rate of safety events in 1730 expectant mothers immunized during campaigns in the Navrongo region of Ghana, and their subsequent born infants with the rates in the women who did not receive the vaccine during the same campaign (n=919) and those vaccinated the previous year (n=3551). No evidence of any safety concerns were reported. These data support current WHO technical guidance which considers it safe to include pregnant and lactating women within mass vaccination campaigns. Although the safety profile is reassuring, there are currently no data on the immunogenicity of MenAfriVac in pregnancy or on the transplacental transfer of Men A specific antibodies to subsequent borne infants. In addition, the comparability of the tetanus toxoid specific seroprotection provided to the newborn through the tetanus toxoid carrier protein and through the standard tetanus toxoid antenatal booster needs to be established.
Within the Protecting from Pneumococcus in Early Life (PROPEL) trial (NCT02628886) trial a group of 200 expectant mothers were randomized into the control group and received tetanus toxoid (and a 0.9% sodium chloride injection to maintain blinding) at 28 to 34 weeks gestation. This group will serve as a control group for the MenAfriVac vaccinated mothers who will be recruited here using an otherwise identical protocol. Those mothers confirmed to be eligible (n = 100) will receive a dose of MenAfriVac at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation and will subsequently followed up using the same approach as undertaken in the PROPEL trial. Their subsequent born infants will also be followed until nine months of age in the same way. Maternal and cord blood samples will be collected at delivery with peripheral infant samples being obtained at delivery, 8 and 20 weeks and at 9 months plus 9 months 4 weeks. The meningococcal serogroup A and tetanus toxoid specific seroprotection in the infants of mothers vaccinated with MenAfriVac will be compared to the seroprotection in those mothers in the control group for the main randomized trial who will only have received tetanus toxoid in pregnancy. All safety procedures will be undertaken in the same way for comparability.
Most mothers in the study will have been immunized in the national MenAfriVac campaign in the Gambia in Nov/Dec 2013, so the controls will not be naïve, and the MenAfriVac arm will be receiving a second dose of the vaccine. This reflects the likely situation were maternal immunization to be recommended in the future. Information on prior immunization history will be collected and assessed within the statistical analysis.
Exploratory nested study:
The study provides an opportunity to monitor the development of the intestinal microbiome from birth to 10 months of age and to assess the effects that any antibiotics, administered in early life for clinical indication, have on this development. Furthermore, to study the downstream effects of distinct microbial profiles on baseline and post-vaccination transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles and immune cell phenotypes, and on the serological responses to vaccination.
The gastrointestinal microbiome is at its most dynamic in early life from the point of first colonization at birth. It is also the period during which parenteral empirical antibiotics are most likely to be administered given the difficulty in excluding invasive bacterial diseases at this age. Thus, early infancy provides the best possible opportunity to study the effects of the microbiome, including of any disruption in the microbiome driven by antibiotic therapy, on baseline (unstimulated) and post-vaccination transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles, immune cell phenotypes and serological response to vaccination.
This component of the study is observational and exploratory. All 100 infants will be administered the routine vaccines in the national schedule due at the time points they are routinely given. Associations between the development of the microbiome with transcriptional and metabolomics signatures, cellular and serological responses to vaccination will be made within group.
268 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningitis; 28 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 260 across 185 interventional studies indexed under Meningitis.
Browse Meningitis studies →London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous premature delivery (defined as delivery before 37 weeks gestation) *
In cases on uncertainly, the clinical significance of any particular complaint will be judged by the PI, in discussion with other members of the clinical trial team. The safety of the expectant mother and unborn infant will always represent the key criteria with this regard. The basis of such decisions will be documented in the participant notes maintained by the clinical trial team.
In the case of an acute illness, including malaria, documented fever or abnormalities in vital signs, and also when 2 or more grade 2 systemic reactogenicity symptoms are present, the potential participant will not be deemed to be a screen failure and thus will not be permanently excluded from participation (unless the assessing clinician has reason be believe the problem will persist). Under these circumstances the expectant mother will be termed a temporary exclusion and will be re-screened at an appropriate interval for eligibility (a minimum of 24 hours in the case of a recorded fever and otherwise according to the clinical judgement of the clinician). If 34 weeks gestation passes during this period of observation, if any other inclusion criteria is no longer met (e.g. the potential participant reaches her 41st birthday) or if another exclusion criteria is met (e.g. the potential subject develops pre-eclampsia), the participant will be deemed to be a screen failure. Repeat serological testing for HIV, Hepatitis B and syphilis is not required at re-screening unless the PI has specific reason to believe that a potential participant's status may have changed in the interval since the original test. A repeat level is not required although may be undertaken if judged to be warranted on the basis of clinical assessment.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hepatitis B tests
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hemoglobin (Hb)
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
mothers will be vaccinated with meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine between 28 - 34 weeks gestation
Biological: meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine
serological samples from 100 control mother-infant pairs already recruited as part of the PROPEL trial, (SCC1433), NCT02628886
Once final eligibility has been confirmed by a study clinician on the day, expectant mothers will be administered a single intramuscular dose of MenAfriVac™.
Also known as: MenAfriVac™.
Meningococcal serogroup A (Men A) serum bactericidal activity (SBA) Geometric Mean Titre (GMT)
Time frame: Infants at birth
Men A SBA GMT
Time frame: Infants at 8 weeks of age
Men A SBA GMT
Time frame: Infants at 20 weeks of age
Men A SBA GMT
Time frame: Infants at 9 months of age
Percentage tetanus toxoid seroprotection
Time frame: Infants at birth
Number of serious adverse events (SAE) in expectant mothers
Time frame: Between 28 to 34 weeks gestation until 8 weeks from the end of pregnancy
Number of SAE in infants
Time frame: From birth until 9 months of age
Injection site pain in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site pain in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site tenderness in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site tenderness in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site erythema in mothers
Diameter of erythema in millimetres
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site erythema in infants
Diameter of erythema in millimetres
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site induration in mothers
Diameter of induration in millimetres
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Injection site induration in infants
Diameter of induration in millimetres
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Axillary temperature in mothers
Degrees Centigrade
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Axillary temperature in infants
Degrees Centigrade
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Vomiting in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Vomiting in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Diarrhoea in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Diarrhoea in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Headaches in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Reduced feeding in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Fatigue in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Drowsiness in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Myalgia in mothers
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Irritability in infants
Grade 0 to 5 severity
Time frame: Day 1 to day 7 following vaccine administration
Pregnancy outcome
Late pregnancy loss, early stillbirth, late stillbirth, livebirth
Time frame: At delivery (approximately 40 weeks gestation)
Men A immunoglobulin G (IgG) Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMC)
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at birth
Men A GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 8 weeks of age
Men A GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 20 weeks of age
Men A GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 9 months of age
Men A SBA GMT
Time frame: Mothers at 28 to 34 weeks gestation
Men A SBA GMT
Time frame: At delivery (approximately 40 weeks gestation)
Tetanus Toxoid IgG GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at birth
Tetanus Toxoid IgG GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 8 weeks
Tetanus Toxoid IgG GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 20 weeks
Tetanus Toxoid IgG GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: Infants at 9 months
Tetanus Toxoid IgG GMC
International units/millilitre
Time frame: At delivery (approximately 40 weeks gestation)
Men A immunoglobulin A levels in breast milk
Units/millilitre
Time frame: 8 weeks from the end of pregnancy
Men A immunoglobulin G levels in breast milk
Unit/millilitre
Time frame: 8 weeks from the end of pregnancy
Number of adverse events (AE) in expectant mothers
Time frame: 28 to 34 weeks gestation until 8 weeks from the end of pregnancy
Number of AE in infants
Time frame: From birth until 9 months of age
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine →