An interventional study of PRP and Steroid Injection in Sacroiliac Joint Arthritis, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-18.
Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a double-blinded study where the injecting physicians and the patients will not know which arm they are randomized to. Each participant will be followed up for 6 months following the injection, and will have in office visits at the injection and approximately 2 weeks post injection. They will be called at month 1, 3, and 6 post injection to assess for any adverse events and number of physical therapy hours or changes in medication. At time of injection, 2 weeks post, and 1, 3 and 6 months after they will be asked to answer some questionnaires on pain and function.
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common and significant source of chronic low back pain. It has been broadly defined as pain located in the area of the SIJ that can be elicited by various pain provocation tests and relieved after infiltration of the joint with local anesthetic.
Essentially, a patients own blood is collected and spun at varying speeds until it separates into 3 layers, one of which is the platelet-rich plasma. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are commonly used in various conditions including chronic tendinopathy, soft tissue injuries, and ligamentous injuries. More recently, there has been a greater interest in examining the efficacy of PRP as a treatment for musculoskeletal conditions affecting joints, such as osteoarthritis (OA). To the investigators' knowledge, there are currently no reported studies evaluating the efficacy of PRP for SIJ pain. Given the previously discussed application and evidence behind the use of PRP in the knee and hip joints, the investigators propose that PRP can also provide a similar solution for treating SIJ pain.
42 studies on the registry are indexed under Sacroiliitis; 11 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 48 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Sacroiliitis.
Browse Sacroiliitis studies →Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.
Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Autologous injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the sacroiliac joint
Procedure: PRP
Steroid injection in the sacroiliac joint
Procedure: Steroid Injection
Autologous platelet-rich plasma
Steroid injection
Change in Visual Analogue Pain (VAS) Score
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Change in Score on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) allows researchers and disability evaluators to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. For each section the total possible score is 5 (0= no pain to 5=worst pain) and there are 10 sections of questions. An aggregate score (percentage) is then calculated, with 0% indicating no disability to 100%, indicating crippled or bed-bound.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.