CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03743207PrematurityUpdated Nov 16, 2018

Preterm Infants May Better Tolerate Warmer Feeds

An interventional study of Room temperature and Warmer temperature in Prematurity and Feeding Disorder Neonatal, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 30 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-16.

Sponsored by Ege University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2012, registered Oct 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 30 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Feeding intolerance is frequent among preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Although there are many studies about enteral nutrition strategies and content in preterm infants, no evidence-based standards exist for the optimal milk temperature for preterm infants. Therefore, in this study the investigators aimed to examine the effects of feeding temperature and the possible morbidities.

Read the detailed description

Feeding intolerance is one of the most frequent problems among preterm infants. These infants are fed with expressed breast milk or preterm formulas of which the temperature is not routinely measured. In this study, the investigators aimed to examine the effects of feeds with warm versus room temperature milk in preterm infants. Infants with a birth weight of ≤1500 g or gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks were included in the study and assigned to two different feeding temperature groups (22-24°C and 32-34°C). Some infants in both groups were exclusive breast milk fed and some received artificial milk. Feeding tolerance of patients in both groups and the consequences were evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prematurity
  • Feeding Disorder Neonatal

Keywords

  • Prematurity
  • Enteral nutrition
  • Feeding tolerance
  • Temperature
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Ege University is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 30 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born to birth weight of ≤1500 g
  • Infants born to gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Genetic syndrome
  • Gastrointestinal system anomalies
  • Patients born small for their gestational age
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Room temperature

    All of the infants in neonatal intensive care units are used to be fed with milk at 22-24°C which is close to room temperature.

    Other: Room temperature

  • Experimental
    Warmer temperature

    The investigators decided to feed the infants in this group with warmer milk at to examine the effects of feeding temperature.

    Other: Warmer temperature

Interventions

  • OtherRoom temperature

    These infants were fed with room temperature (22-24 °C) so that hypothesizing that they will have more feeding tolerance and therefore more co-existing morbidities.

  • OtherWarmer temperature

    Fifteen NICU mothers volunteered and expressed their milk for rapid measurement of freshly expressed breast milk. The mean (± SD) temperature of freshly expressed breast milk was found to be 33±1.5 °C in these preliminary measurements. Confirming this finding, the investigators decided to feed these infants with milk at 32 - 34 °C to examine the effects of feeding temperature and the possible comorbidities with a hypothesis that warmer feeding at the temperature of freshly expressed breast milk may be better physiologically.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gastric residual volume in mililitres after every feeding

    Gastric residual volume amount during the study

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Transition time to total enteral feeding

    The time needed for transition time to total enteral feeding

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Daily weight gain

    The daily weight gain of the infant during the study

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  3. Need for anti reflux treatment

    ıf the infant needed antireflux treatment, the treatment options were recorded

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  4. Body weight at discharge

    Body weight at discharge

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ege University
    İzmir, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03743207
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Ozge Altun Koroglu (Associated Professor, M.D., Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2012
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2014
Completion
Apr 30, 2014
Last update
Nov 16, 2018

Study contacts

Ozge Altun Koroglu, M.D.
study chair · Ege University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion