CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03733262Updated Dec 13, 2024

Targeted Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis

An observational study in End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis (Diagnosis), sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Recruiting at 4 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-13.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hemodialysis (HD) patients take more pills per day on average than any other chronically ill patient population. On average, an HD patient takes 19 medications per day, of which 70% may not be appropriate. The reason the medications may not be appropriate is that HD patients are rarely included in clinical trials for new medications and therefore the efficacy and safety data that exists for the general population may not actually apply to them. Tools to guide the re-assessment and discontinuation (deprescribing) of these specific medications that lack evidence for efficacy and safety in HD patients are needed. These tools will help reduce the amount of medications being taken and the potential negative consequences of taking so many medications (e.g. adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, non-adherence, increased risk of cognitive impairment, impaired balance and falls, and increased risk of morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality).

Nine medications that are often inappropriately prescribed to HD patients have been identified by the investigators. These medications are: Alpha-1 Blockers, Anticonvulsants, Benzodiazepines \& Z-Drugs, Loop Diuretics, Prokinetic Agents, Proton Pump Inhibitors, Quinine, Urate Lowering Agents, and Statins. The investigators developed and validated tools to help medical teams in outpatient HD units with identifying and stopping these medications in their patients. The next step will be to perform a study where test these tools are tested in practice at multiple HD centers across Canada. This initiative should decrease the average number of medications per patient and inappropriate medication use in the HD units where these tools are used. The overall objective of this study is to improve current clinical practice by optimizing medication use and prescribing patterns in the HD units across Canada.

Read the detailed description

Background: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are rarely included in clinical trials, thus medication efficacy and safety data specific to this population is lacking. Toxicity from medications inadequately removed by dialysis is also a risk for them. HD patients take an average of 19 pills daily, with 70% potentially inappropriate.

This polypharmacy increases their risk of adverse events, drug-drug interactions, non-adherence, cognitive impairment, impaired balance and falls, morbidity, hospitalization and mortality. Using provincial databases, the investigators identified 9 medication classes with uncertain indications and/or safety in HD patients: Alpha-1 Blockers, Anticonvulsants, Benzodiazepines \& Z-medications, Loop Diuretics, Prokinetic Agents, Proton Pump Inhibitors, Quinine, Urate Lowering Agents and Statins. The investigators developed and validated tools for deprescribing, safety monitoring and patient education for each of these medications. The next step will be to perform an implementation study evaluating these deprescribing tools at multiple HD units across Canada.

The investigators hypothesize that implementation of these deprescribing tools will decrease polypharmacy and improve safety and patient satisfaction in these HD units. Specific Aims are to determine:

  1. Effectiveness of the deprescribing algorithms for decreasing polypharmacy (i.e. % of successful deprescribing of at least 1 of the medication classes at 6 month post implementation)
  2. Safety of the deprescribing algorithms using monitoring tools developed for each medication
  3. The impact of the deprescribing tools on patient satisfaction

Methods: In this quasi-experimental interventional cohort study, the nephrology healthcare team will assess medications for all patients as per usual practice in their respective HD units, using the deprescribing algorithms to assist in clinical decision making and patient education tools to explain rationale to patients. Participating patients will be followed for 6 months for outcomes.

The primary outcome will be proportion of individuals successfully deprescribed at least one of the 9 target medications.

Additional outcomes include:

  • Adverse events associated with deprescribing and medication class specific safety outcomes (e.g. for furosemide, the investigators will be tracking blood pressure, potassium, intradialytic weight gain and heart failure admissions)
  • Proportion of identified candidates who began a deprescribing trial
  • Proportion of deprescribing trials declined by medical team and patient, respectively
  • Patient satisfaction (using a patient survey)
  • Average number of medications per patient before/after implementation
  • Average medication cost savings per patient

Expected Results/Impact on Health Research: This study will determine the efficacy of the deprescribing algorithms on reducing polypharmacy in HD patients. It will also provide insights on knowledge translation, as investigators aim to educate providers and patients on the harms of polypharmacy and influence prescribing patterns in HD units nationally. This study will encourage other institutions to incorporate similar tools into their practice and encourage comprehensive and team based re-assessment of patient's medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • deprescribing
  • hemodialysis
  • medication optimization
  • medication prescribing patterns
  • patient safety
  • polypharmacy
  • pill burden
  • quality improvement activity
  • chronic kidney disease
  • end-stage renal disease
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 480 is above the median of 192 across 1,033 observational studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

There will be approximately 1,200 patients in the outpatient HD units from Toronto (300), Vancouver (200), Winnipeg (400) and Halifax (300). Based on a previous pilot study, it is assumed that 80% of patients have been prescribed at least one of the nine target drugs (i.e., n=960). Of those, it is assumed that 50% will be eligible for the study (i.e., n=480). Of eligible individuals, it is assumed 88% will initiate a De-prescribing Trial (Intervention Group), resulting in an anticipated cohort of n=420.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18+ years
  • Have been receiving outpatient HD treatment at one of the four study sites for at least the past three months
  • Able to read and understand English and provide consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute starts to HD
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Hemodialysis Patients

    There will be approximately 1,200 patients in the outpatient HD units from Toronto (300), Vancouver (200), Winnipeg (400) and Halifax (300). Based on a previous pilot study, it is assumed that 80% of patients have been prescribed at least one of the nine target drugs (i.e., n=960). Of those, it is assumed that 50% will be eligible for the study (i.e., n=480). Of eligible individuals, it is assumed 88% will initiate a De-prescribing Trial (Intervention Group), resulting in an anticipated cohort of n=420.

    Other: De-prescribing Trial

Interventions

  • OtherDe-prescribing Trial

    Validated de-prescribing algorithms will be applied for any patients identified as taking one of the 9 study drugs in order to determine whether or not physician should consider a deprescribing trial. If they are are identified as candidates for deprescribing and consent to participate in the trial, they will enter the Deprescribing Trial group and begin the deprescribing trial.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who began any of the 9 deprescribing trials who have successfully stayed off that medications by the end of the study

    Numbers will be given for each of the 9 drug classes and overall

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who were identified as candidates for a deprescribing trial, after an assessment using one of the nine deprescribing algorithms

    Numbers will be given for each of the 9 drug classes and overall

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Number of patients who were identified as candidates for a deprescribing trial (after an assessment using one of the nine deprescribing algorithms) but who did not begin a deprescribing trial due to refusal by the medical team

    Numbers will be given for each of the 9 drug classes and overall

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Number of patients who were identified as candidates for a deprescribing trial (after an assessment using one of the nine deprescribing algorithms) but who did not begin a deprescribing trial due to refusal by the patient

    Numbers will be given for each of the 9 drug classes and overall

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Average number of medications (including target medications and any other medications) per patient before and after this deprescribing implementation study

    Average number of medications (including target medications and any other medications) per patient before and after this deprescribing implementation study

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Change in patient satisfaction scores pre-intervention vs. post-intervention, as assessed by patient satisfaction surveys (developed for this study) administered before the study and 6 months after the study start date

    The patient satisfaction survey is based on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers \& Systems (CAHPS®) In-Center HD Survey, which rates the medication and dialysis services. Most questions are on a Likert scale ranging from Never (1) to Always (4) or from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strong Agree (5). There are also two No (1) / Yes (2) questions and one 0 (Worst possible) to 10 (Best possible) question. The survey is divided into 3 sections: Dialysis Center Staff, Your Medications, and Deprescribing. The average total score overall for patients before vs. after the study will be compared (higher scores indicate higher satisfaction). The average total score per section for patients before vs. after the study will also be compared.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, as assessed by patient monitoring app (developed for this study)

    The study app will track at adverse events associated with deprescribing each of the specific medication classes. For example: for loopdiuretics, blood pressure, potassium, intradialytic weight gain and heart failure admissions will be tracked; for proton pump inhibitors, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom severity and frequency of antacid use will be tracked By comparing baseline symptoms to symptoms during and at the completion of deprescribing, safety concerns will be identified.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Estimated cost savings to the patient and to the healthcare system due to deprescribing initiative

    The cost of medications that are deprescribed will be calculated based on a yearly supply at the current dose of the patient's therapy. Total costs will be calculated based on current practices for each province. By identifying patients who have their medication costs covered by the healthcare system, it will be possible to determine the medication cost savings to the healthcare system. For patients who are insured through private insurance plans, or who pay cash for their medications, the provincial formulary cost represents the most conservative approach when calculating the total medication costs. This approach will therefore determine the minimum cost savings to the patient. Overall, both cost savings to the patient and the healthcare system due to deprescribing in HD patients will be determined.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Providence Health Care
    Vancouver, British Colombia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
    Active, not recruiting
  • Manitoba Renal Program
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R2V 3M3, Canada
    Active, not recruiting
  • Nova Scotia Health Authority
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Active, not recruiting
  • University Health Network
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03733262
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Marisa Battistella (Pharmacy Clinician Scientist, University Health Network, Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2018
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 13, 2024

Study contacts

Marisa Battistella, PharmD
Contact
marisa.battistella@uhn.ca
416-340-4800 ext. 3207
Melissa Lefebvre, MBiotech
Contact
melissa.lefebvre@uhnresearch.ca
416-858-9786
Marisa Battistella, PharmD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion