A Phase 4 interventional study of lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application and 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment in Actinic Keratosis, sponsored by Dong-A University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-06.
Sponsored by Dong-A University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT) has shown significant benefit for the treatment of actinic keratosis(AK). Er:YAG ablative fractional laser ablates the epidermis and dermis without significant thermal injury, creating microscopic ablation zones (MAZ) in the portion of the skin that the laser is applied to. The formed MAZ depends on the laser parameters such as laser depth, laser density and laser passes, which affect the treatment outcome.
This study evaluated whether different laser densities influenced the efficacy, side effects, cosmetic outcomes, and protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) accumulation of AFL-PDT for facial AK in a randomized clinical trial.
364 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratosis, Actinic; 31 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 60 across 315 interventional studies indexed under Keratosis, Actinic.
Browse Keratosis, Actinic studies →Dong-A University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 5.5%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application · Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment · Drug: MAL application · Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity · Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp
After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 11%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application · Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment · Drug: MAL application · Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity · Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp
After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 22%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application · Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment · Drug: MAL application · Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity · Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp
For AFL pre-treatment, lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) cream (EMLA; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area under occlusion for 30 min
After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 5.5% or 11% or 22% laser density with 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Immediately after AFL treatment, an approximately 1- mm-thick layer of MAL (Metvix, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and on 5 mm of surrounding normal tissue. Incubation time is 3 hours
After 3 hours of application with MAL, saline wash was performed and fluorescence imaging analysis was performed with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence (610 nm-700 nm) was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.
After incubation for 3 hours, the dressing and cream were removed, and the area was cleansed with saline. The area was irradiated with a red light-emitting diode lamp (Aktilite CL 128; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with peak emission at 632 nm, placed 5 cm away from the skin surface, and a total light dose of 37 J/cm-2. All patients wore protective goggles during illumination.
Differences of short-term complete response rates between 3 groups
Lesion responses were classified as either a complete response (complete disappearance of the lesion) or a noncomplete response (incomplete disappearance)
Time frame: Short-term complete response rates were evaluated at 3 months after treatment
Differences of long-term complete response rates between 3 groups
In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.
Time frame: Long-term complete response rates were evaluated at 12 months
Difference of the recurrence rates between 3 groups
In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.
Time frame: Recurrence rates were evaluated respectively at 12 months after treatment
Differences of the fluorescence intensity between 3 groups
After 3 hours of application with methyl aminolevulinate(MAL), Fluorescence imaging analysis was performed on treatment area with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.
Time frame: After 3 hours of application with MAL, fluorescence intensity imaging was assessed 10 minutes before illumination.
Differences of cosmetic outcomes between 3 groups
Cosmetic outcomes were graded as excellent (slight redness or pigmentation change), good (moderate redness or pigmentation change), fair (slight-to-moderate scarring, atrophy, or induration), or poor (extensive scarring, atrophy, or induration)
Time frame: The overall cosmetic outcome was assessed 12 months after treatment
Difference of adverse events (erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, edema, itching, oozing, bleeding) rates between 3 groups
Adverse events reported by the patient were noted at each follow-up visit, including severity, duration and need for additional therapy. All events due to PDT were described as phototoxic reactions (i.e., erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, oedema, itching, oozing, bleeding and so forth).
Time frame: Within 12 months after each treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dong-A University