An interventional study of CPR self-training in Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation, sponsored by Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-02.
Sponsored by Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Participants were 45 first-year medical students randomly assigned to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) self-training using either a video-based presentation or a serious game developed in a 3D learning environment for up to 20 min. Each participant was evaluated on a written, multiple-choice test (theoretical test) and then on a scenario of cardiac arrest (practical test) before and after exposure to the self-learning methods.
A prospective, simulation-based, randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomised to the video group watched a video-recorded lecture on the management of adult cardiac arrest, while participants randomised to the game group played a serious game on the same topic.
The video was developed based on a previously recorded Keynote presentation (version 6.6.2, Apple Inc.) with the addition of voice-over narration of the events. The video was edited to contain the same information as provided in the serious game. The learning environment simulated an urban public space where the player should identify a victim of cardiac arrest and perform CPR manoeuvres. The game was designed to be a CPR self-learning tool for both health professionals and the lay public. The game involved only one rescuer without access to a portable defibrillator. During the game, the player should identify the victim, diagnose cardiac arrest correctly and initiate CPR as early as possible. The actions of the player were guided throughout the game by step-by-step instructions that should be followed to save the victim's life and to score on the game. Whenever the manoeuvres were not performed correctly, the victim died and the game automatically restarted from the beginning.
After exposure to the self-learning methods, participants were reassessed individually for their theoretical knowledge on a written, 10-question, multiple-choice test (theoretical post-test) and for their practical performance by three examiners, blinded to group assignment, who independently rated the participants' actions on a 10-min simulated scenario of cardiac arrest using a CPR training manikin (practical post-test).
Simulated scenario The same simulated scenario was used for pre-exposure and post-exposure practical evaluation. When the student entered the simulation room, a manikin was lying on the floor, simulating a person lying on the street, unconscious, not responding to stimulation and with no respiratory effort or pulse. The student was alone without access to medical equipment such as a defibrillator. Participants were expected to recognise the cardiac arrest, call the emergency services, and initiate chest compressions and ventilations as soon as possible for at least two cycles. A 10-min time limit was set for each simulation session.
965 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 225 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 100 across 556 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.
Browse Heart Arrest studies →Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention: CPR self-training with serious game.
Other: CPR self-training
Intervention: CPR self-training with Keynote presentation with the addition of voice-over narration.
Other: CPR self-training
American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for CPR
Mean performance score of students on each (theoretical and practical) test for each study arm.
Time frame: 2 hours
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul