CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03727113OptimbiomaUpdated Feb 17, 2023

Optimization of Antibiotic Treatment in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Receptors

An observational study in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Graft Versus Host Disease, sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla. Completed at 5 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-17.

Sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
211
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are data suggesting that the reduction of the diversity of intestinal microbiota caused by the used treatments in the setting of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT), and specially antibiotics, may be related to increased incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and worst clinical outcomes. Present "European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia" guidelines exhort to antibiotic treatment optimization in hematological patients, without excluding ASCT receptors. This study aims to demonstrate that in ASCT receptors a predefined protocol of optimization of the antibacterial treatment will preserve the intestinal microbiota diversity which will correlate with decrease incidence of acute GVHD. And that this procedure is safe because it will not worsen the incidence of infections, transplant related mortality, infectious mortality or global survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Graft Versus Host Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • microbiota
  • microbiome
  • graft versus host disease
  • infection
  • antibiotics
03

In context

Graft vs Host Disease

806 studies on the registry are indexed under Graft vs Host Disease; 138 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 211 is above the median of 94 across 102 observational studies indexed under Graft vs Host Disease.

Browse Graft vs Host Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (> 18 years old) who are going to receive their first hematopoietic allogeneic transplant of any modality and who sign the informed consent to participate in this study will be included.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients admitted to receive their first allogeneic hematopoietic transplant as a treatment of any disease.
  • Conformity of the patient to participate by signing the informed consent.
  • Patients who have received a previous autologous transplant are not excluded.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-compliance of the patient to sign the informed consent.
  • Patients who have already started the conditioning (or thereafter) will not be included.
  • Allograft recipients who have previously received the transplant will not be included. Second allogeneic transplants are excluded.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
211 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control cohort

    Patients receiving an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant in Centers using a classical strategy of administration of antibiotics.

    Procedure: Control cohort

  • Optimization cohort

    Patients receiving an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant in Centers using an optimization/antibiotic strategy.

    Procedure: Optimization cohort

Interventions

  • ProcedureOptimization cohort

    Recipients of an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant in Centers using an optimization/antibiotic strategy.

  • ProcedureControl cohort

    Recipients of an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant in Centers using a classical strategy of administration of antibiotics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact on microbiota

    Comparison of biological alpha and beta diversity of the intestinal microbiota of both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy). Calculation of alpha diversity (OTUs richness and Shannon diversity indexes observed, Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity and Evenness) and beta diversity (Jaccard distance, Bray-Curtis distance, Unweighted UniFra distance, used for comparing biological communities) indexes by QIIME 2 (microbiome bioinformatics platform).

    Time frame: From the Previous Day of starting conditioning treatment until the last documented day of antibiotherapy or hospital discharge, whichever came first, assessed up to one month post-transplant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Acute graft versus host disease

    Comparison of the incidence of any degree, degree-II and degree-III/IV of acute graft versus host disease between the groups of patients with high and low diversity in their microbiota. Cumulative Incidence curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Gray Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Day +100 posttransplant

  2. Transplant related mortality

    Comparison of transplant related mortality between both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy). Cumulative Incidence curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Gray Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Days +30, +100 and +365 posttransplant

  3. Mortality caused by infection

    Comparison of infection related mortality between both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy. Cumulative Incidence curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Gray Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Days +30, +100 and +365 posttransplant

  4. Incidence of severe infections

    Comparison of the incidence of severe infections between both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy). Cumulative Incidence curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Gray Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Day +30 posttransplant

  5. Overall survival

    Comparison of overall survival between both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy) Kaplan-Meier curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Log-Rank Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Days +30, +100 and +365 posttransplant

  6. Disease free survival

    Comparison of the diseae free survival between both study groups (classical and optimized antibiotherapy Kaplan-Meier curve estimation. Test for the comparison of groups: Log-Rank Test.

    Time frame: From the day of transplant (Day 0) to Days +30, +100 and +365 posttransplant

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville.
    Sevilla, Seville 41013, Spain
  • Gregorio Marañón University Hospital
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Salamanca University Hospital
    Salamanca, 37007, Spain
  • Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
    Santander, 39008, Spain
  • University Clinical Hospital of Valencia
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aguilar-Guisado M, Espigado I, Martin-Pena A, Gudiol C, Royo-Cebrecos C, Falantes J, Vazquez-Lopez L, Montero MI, Rosso-Fernandez C, de la Luz Martino M, Parody R, Gonzalez-Campos J, Garzon-Lopez S, Calderon-Cabrera C, Barba P, Rodriguez N, Rovira M, Montero-Mateos E, Carratala J, Perez-Simon JA, Cisneros JM. Optimisation of empirical antimicrobial therapy in patients with haematological malignancies and febrile neutropenia (How Long study): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e573-e583. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30211-9. Epub 2017 Nov 15. PubMed 29153975 ↗
  • Averbuch D, Orasch C, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Gyssens IC, Kern WV, Klyasova G, Marchetti O, Engelhard D, Akova M; ECIL4, a joint venture of EBMT, EORTC, ICHS, ESGICH/ESCMID and ELN. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1826-35. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091025. Erratum In: Haematologica. 2014 Feb;99(2):400. PubMed 24323983 ↗
  • Jimenez-Jorge S, Labrador-Herrera G, Rosso-Fernandez CM, Rodriguez-Torres N, Pachon-Ibanez ME, Smani Y, Marquez-Malaver FJ, Limon Ramos C, Solano C, Vazquez-Lopez L, Kwon M, Mora Barrios JM, Aguilar-Guisado M, Espigado I; GETH (Grupo Espanol de Trasplante Hematopoyetico y Terapia Celular). Assessing the impact on intestinal microbiome and clinical outcomes of antibiotherapy optimisation strategies in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: study protocol for the prospective multicentre OptimBioma study. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e034570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034570. PubMed 32690735 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03727113
Lead sponsor
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
Collaborators
Grupo Espanol de trasplantes hematopoyeticos y terapia celular, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2018
Start date
Jan 16, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 17, 2023

Study contacts

Ildefonso Espigado, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Hematology Service, Hematopoietic Transplant Program, Seville Biomedicine Institute (IBIS) - Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion