An interventional study of CBCT radiation in Metal Artifacts, sponsored by Cairo University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-23.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The effect of metal artifacts reduction protocols and tube potential difference on the metallic artifacts in cone beam computed tomography
Our study is a quantitative as well as a qualitative assessment of the metal artifacts in the CBCT images in a bio models with multiple adjacent dental implants and single isolated implants , while using different MAR protocols inherited in the CBCT soft ware , as well as change in the tube potential difference of the CBCT unit
Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,909 studies on the registry; 1,445 are open to participants now.
Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Different kVp values of the CBCT machine 70, 80 ,90 kVp
Radiation: CBCT radiation
MAR option in the software off and on
Radiation: CBCT radiation
CBCT scanning
Dental implant linear measurement
The implant length and width in millimeters will be assessed in the presence of the artifacts with and without the activation of the MAR tool of the CBCT soft ware, also change in the potential difference will be done with and without the activation of MAR tool
Time frame: 1 month
Bone- implant interphase
Qualitative assessment if bone - implant interphase, will be either zero or 1 zero indicate that bone implant interphase cannot be assessed , one indicate that the bone implant interphase can be assessed
Time frame: 1 month
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2018, 1 month.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.