CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03713320SOLARUpdated Apr 8, 2022Results posted

SOLAR: Efficacy and Safety of Cobomarsen (MRG-106) vs. Active Comparator in Subjects With Mycosis Fungoides

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cobomarsen and Vorinostat in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma/Mycosis Fungoides, sponsored by miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.. Terminated at 43 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-08.

Sponsored by miRagen Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study was terminated early for business reasons, and not due to concerns regarding safety or lack of efficacy.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this clinical trial is to study the efficacy and safety of cobomarsen (also known as MRG-106) for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), mycosis fungoides (MF) subtype. Cobomarsen is designed to inhibit the activity of a molecule called miR-155 that may be important to the growth and survival of MF cancer cells. The study will compare the effects of cobomarsen to vorinostat, a drug that has been approved for the treatment of CTCL in the United States and several other countries.

Participants in the clinical trial will be randomly assigned to receive either weekly doses of cobomarsen by injection into a vein or daily oral doses of vorinostat. Participants will continue on their assigned treatment as long as there is no evidence of progression of their cancer. The effects of treatment will be measured based on changes in skin lesion severity, as well as the length of time that the subject's disease remains stable or improved, without evidence of disease progression. The safety and tolerability of cobomarsen will be assessed based on the frequency and severity of observed side effects.

Participants assigned to receive vorinostat who experience progression of their disease during their participation in this study may have the option to be treated with cobomarsen in an open-label, crossover arm of the same study if they meet the entry criteria for that part of the study.

Read the detailed description

Study Design:

Subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cobomarsen or vorinostat. Approximately 126 subjects (63 per arm) are expected to be enrolled. Cobomarsen will be administered in the clinic by 2-hr intravenous infusion on Days 1, 3, 5 and 8, and weekly thereafter. Vorinostat will be dispensed to study subjects and taken as a daily oral dose according to the manufacturer's labeled dosing instructions. Treatment will continue until the subject becomes intolerant, develops clinically significant side effects, progresses, or the trial is terminated. An interim analysis will be conducted after approximately 40 subjects have been followed for a minimum of approximately 6 months. Enrollment will be suspended until the completion of the interim analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma/Mycosis Fungoides

Keywords

  • SOLAR
  • Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
  • CTCL
  • Mycosis Fungoides
  • Lymphoma
  • Lymphoma, T-cell
  • Lymphoma, T-cell, cutaneous
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
  • Lymphoproliferative Disorders
  • Lymphatic Diseases
  • Immunoproliferative Disorders
  • Immune System Diseases
  • Neoplasms
  • MicroRNAs
  • Vorinostat
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy-proven CTCL, MF subtype
  • Clinical stage IB, II, or III, with staging based on screening assessments
  • Minimum mSWAT score of 10 at screening
  • Receipt of at least one prior therapy for CTCL

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous enrollment in a cobomarsen study
  • Prior therapy with vorinostat or other HDAC inhibitors, or contraindication to an HDAC inhibitor
  • Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides with B2 involvement, defined as documented history of B2 and/or B2 staging at screening
  • Evidence of large cell transformation
  • Lymph node involvement at screening, unless radiologically or histologically confirmed to be nonmalignant
  • Visceral involvement related to MF at screening
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cobomarsen

    Cobomarsen will be administered by intravenous 2-hour infusion at a dose of 282 mg on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and weekly thereafter

    Drug: Cobomarsen

  • Active comparator
    Vorinostat

    Vorinostat will be administered orally at a dose of 400 mg (four 100-mg capsules) once daily with food, at approximately the same time each day.

    Drug: Vorinostat

Interventions

  • DrugCobomarsen

    At least weekly doses of cobomarsen (282 mg) throughout study treatment period

    Also known as: MRG-106

  • DrugVorinostat

    Daily doses of vorinostat throughout study treatment period

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Objective Skin Response of at Least 4 Months Duration (ORR4)

    ORR4 is the percentage of subjects with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in the skin for 4 consecutive months confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 28 days (± 3 days) later. The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) is used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of body surface area (BSA) with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores are calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores. Lower scores indicate a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponds to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponds to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.

    Time frame: Date of first dose through the earlier of last study visit or interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time from date of randomization until the date of earliest documented progression or death from any cause. The duration of PFS was censored at the date of the last mSWAT assessment if the subject was alive and had no documented progression. Disease progression in the skin is defined as ≥ 25% increase in mSWAT score from baseline or, in participants with complete or partial response, increase in mSWAT score of greater than the sum of the nadir plus 50% baseline score.

    Time frame: Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  2. Complete Response Rate

    Percentage of subjects with a complete response in the skin based on mSWAT

    Time frame: Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  3. Time to Progression

    Time from date of randomization until the earliest date of confirmed progression

    Time frame: Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  4. Time to Maximal Effect in mSWAT

    Time to greatest improvement in mSWAT score

    Time frame: Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  5. Objective Response Rate in the Skin of at Least 28-days Duration (ORR1)

    Percentage of participants achieving ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT of at least 28-days duration

    Time frame: Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  6. Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 28 Days

    Percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in mSWAT at 28 days after first dose

    Time frame: 28 days after first dose

  7. Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 4 Months

    Percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in mSWAT at 4 months after first dose

    Time frame: 4 months after first dose

  8. Time to ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT

    Time from date of randomization until ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT score

    Time frame: Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  9. Duration of Response in Skin

    Duration of response in skin (no progression after achieving ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT)

    Time frame: Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

  10. Pruritus Medication Utilization

    Change from baseline in number of pruritus medications taken per subject

    Time frame: Date of first dose through end of treatment or interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

Other outcomes

  1. Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - First Dose

    Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of cobomarsen after first dose

    Time frame: 1, 1.92, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose after the first dose

  2. Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - Week 5

    Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of cobomarsen after fourth dose (Week 5)

    Time frame: 1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose

  3. Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve (AUC) of Cobomarsen - Week 5

    Area under the curve (AUClast) for cobomarsen plasma concentration versus time curve after the fourth (Week 5) dose

    Time frame: 1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose

  4. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody Generation

    Number of participants who develop antibodies to cobomarsen during treatment

    Time frame: Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

06

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated early for business reasons, and not due to concerns regarding safety or lack of efficacy. Because the study was terminated early, enrollment was ended at 37 participants instead of the initially planned 126 participants, and a planned interim analysis based on these 37 participants was the only analysis performed for the study. The study duration was also shortened from an estimated 36 months to 20 months overall.

Participant flow

Randomized Period
Participant flow — Randomized Period
MilestoneCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)Cobomarsen (Crossover)
Started19180
Completed480
Not completed15100
Withdrew: Adverse event150
Withdrew: Physician decision110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject400
Withdrew: Participant decision310
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor630
Cobomarsen Crossover Period
Participant flow — Cobomarsen Crossover Period
MilestoneCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)Cobomarsen (Crossover)
Started007
Completed000
Not completed007
Withdrew: Physician decision002
Withdrew: Sponsor decision to terminate trial005

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving an Objective Skin Response of at Least 4 Months Duration (ORR4)

ORR4 is the percentage of subjects with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in the skin for 4 consecutive months confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 28 days (± 3 days) later. The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) is used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of body surface area (BSA) with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores are calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores. Lower scores indicate a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponds to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponds to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.

Time frame:
Date of first dose through the earlier of last study visit or interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Objective Skin Response of at Least 4 Months Duration (ORR4)
Percentage of participantsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Objective Skin Response of at Least 4 Months Duration (ORR4)15.816.7
Statistical analysis
  • Cobomarsen (Randomized) vs Vorinostat (Randomized) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = .9539
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

Time from date of randomization until the date of earliest documented progression or death from any cause. The duration of PFS was censored at the date of the last mSWAT assessment if the subject was alive and had no documented progression. Disease progression in the skin is defined as ≥ 25% increase in mSWAT score from baseline or, in participants with complete or partial response, increase in mSWAT score of greater than the sum of the nadir plus 50% baseline score.

Time frame:
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)NA (9.26 to NA)6.01 (2.89 to 8.90)
Statistical analysis
  • Cobomarsen (Randomized) vs Vorinostat (Randomized) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.011
SecondaryComplete Response Rate

Percentage of subjects with a complete response in the skin based on mSWAT

Time frame:
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Complete Response Rate
Percentage of participantsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Complete Response Rate05.6
SecondaryTime to Progression

Time from date of randomization until the earliest date of confirmed progression

Time frame:
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Mean · Months
Time to Progression
MonthsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Time to ProgressionNA (9.26 to NA)6.01 (2.89 to 8.90)
SecondaryTime to Maximal Effect in mSWAT

Time to greatest improvement in mSWAT score

Time frame:
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Mean · Months
Time to Maximal Effect in mSWAT
MonthsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Time to Maximal Effect in mSWAT4.5 ± 3.73.0 ± 2.7
SecondaryObjective Response Rate in the Skin of at Least 28-days Duration (ORR1)

Percentage of participants achieving ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT of at least 28-days duration

Time frame:
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate in the Skin of at Least 28-days Duration (ORR1)
percentage of participantsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Objective Response Rate in the Skin of at Least 28-days Duration (ORR1)31.633.3
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 28 Days

Percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in mSWAT at 28 days after first dose

Time frame:
28 days after first dose
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 28 Days
percentage of participantsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 28 Days5.311.1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 4 Months

Percentage of subjects achieving ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in mSWAT at 4 months after first dose

Time frame:
4 months after first dose
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 4 Months
percentage of participantsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT at 4 Months21.122.2
SecondaryTime to ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT

Time from date of randomization until ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT score

Time frame:
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Mean · Months
Time to ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT
MonthsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Time to ≥ 50% Improvement in mSWAT3.7 ± 2.72.7 ± 1.8
SecondaryDuration of Response in Skin

Duration of response in skin (no progression after achieving ≥ 50% improvement in mSWAT)

Time frame:
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response in Skin
MonthsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Duration of Response in SkinNA (NA to NA)7.85 (6.60 to NA)
SecondaryPruritus Medication Utilization

Change from baseline in number of pruritus medications taken per subject

Time frame:
Date of first dose through end of treatment or interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Reported as:
Mean · Number of pruritus medications
Pruritus Medication Utilization
Number of pruritus medicationsCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)
Pruritus Medication Utilization-1 ± 2.39-0.9 ± 1.35
Other pre-specifiedPeak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - First Dose

Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of cobomarsen after first dose

Time frame:
1, 1.92, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose after the first dose
Reported as:
Mean · µg/mL
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - First Dose
µg/mLCobomarsen (Randomized)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - First Dose10.5 ± 7.17
Other pre-specifiedPeak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - Week 5

Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of cobomarsen after fourth dose (Week 5)

Time frame:
1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose
Reported as:
Mean · µg/mL
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - Week 5
µg/mLCobomarsen (Randomized)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - Week 59.34 ± 3.24
Other pre-specifiedArea Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve (AUC) of Cobomarsen - Week 5

Area under the curve (AUClast) for cobomarsen plasma concentration versus time curve after the fourth (Week 5) dose

Time frame:
1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose
Reported as:
Mean · µg*hr/mL
Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve (AUC) of Cobomarsen - Week 5
µg*hr/mLCobomarsen (Randomized)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve (AUC) of Cobomarsen - Week 525.5 ± 6.27
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody Generation

Number of participants who develop antibodies to cobomarsen during treatment

Time frame:
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over All adverse events (AEs) that occurred from the time of informed consent through the last study visit, up to 18 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cobomarsen (Randomized)0/19 (0%)2/19 (10.5%)18/19 (94.7%)
Vorinostat (Randomized)0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)18/18 (100%)
Cobomarsen (Crossover)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)5/7 (71.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)Cobomarsen (Crossover)
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/191/180/7
Skin infectionInfections and infestations1/190/180/7
Superinfection of Skin LesionsInfections and infestations1/190/180/7
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 144
Most frequent other events
EventCobomarsen (Randomized)Vorinostat (Randomized)Cobomarsen (Crossover)
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/198/181/7
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders8/196/180/7
FatigueGeneral disorders7/196/182/7
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders7/194/180/7
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/196/180/7
HypertensionVascular disorders3/195/182/7
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/195/180/7
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/191/180/7
Skin infectionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/190/180/7
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/194/180/7

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years131427
>=65 years6410
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Female9716
Male101121
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Hispanic or Latino415
Not Hispanic or Latino141428
Unknown or Not Reported134
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White171330
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported235
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Canada101
Belgium235
United States9817
Italy011
United Kingdom426
France134
Spain213
Skin tumor at screening
Skin tumor at screening(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Count of participants6410
No skin tumor at screening
No skin tumor at screening(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Count of participants131427
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is greater than upper limit normal (ULN) at diagnosis
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is greater than upper limit normal (ULN) at diagnosis(Participants)CobomarsenVorinostatTotal
Count of participants426

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

43 sites
  • The University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90404, United States
  • Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Irvine
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63108, United States
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group
    Fairport, New York 14450, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Inova Schar Cancer Institute
    Fairfax, Virginia 22031, United States
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
    Concord, New South Wales 2139, Australia
  • Westmead Hospital
    Westmead, New South Wales NSW 2145, Australia
  • Linear Clinical Research
    Nedlands, 6009, Australia
  • University Clinic UZ Leuven
    Leuven, B3000, Belgium
  • Cross Cancer Institute
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • Jewish General Hospital
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • Hôpital Saint André, CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
  • Hôpital Robert Dubré, CHU de Reims
    Reims, 51100, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milano, 20122, Italy
  • AOU Citta dell Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Fundación Jiménez Diaz
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
    Salamanca, 37007, Spain
  • Consorcio Hospital General Universitario Valencia
    Valencia, 46014, Spain
  • University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
    Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
  • Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Center
    London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ganguly K, Kishore U, Madan T. Interplay between C-type lectin receptors and microRNAs in cellular homeostasis and immune response. FEBS J. 2021 Jul;288(14):4210-4229. doi: 10.1111/febs.15603. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PubMed 33085815 ↗
  • Valipour A, Jager M, Wu P, Schmitt J, Bunch C, Weberschock T. Interventions for mycosis fungoides. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3. PubMed 32632956 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 10, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03713320
Lead sponsor
miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 19, 2018
Start date
Apr 2, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 12, 2020
Completion
Dec 1, 2020
Results posted
Apr 8, 2022
Last update
Apr 8, 2022

Study contacts

Diana M. Escolar, MD, FAAN
study director · miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion