CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03707366FHF-TUpdated Apr 29, 2026

Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT

An interventional study of FHF-T in Child Abuse, Child Neglect and Risk Behavior, sponsored by University of Denver. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by University of Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
234
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will implement and evaluate a mentoring program designed to promote positive youth development and reduce adverse outcomes among maltreated adolescents with open child welfare cases. Teenagers who have been maltreated are at heightened risk for involvement in delinquency, substance use, and educational failure as a result of disrupted attachments with caregivers and exposure to violence within their homes and communities. Although youth mentoring is a widely used prevention approach nationally, it has not been rigorously studied for its effects in preventing these adverse outcomes among maltreated youth involved in the child welfare system. This randomized controlled trial will permit us to implement and evaluate the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens (FHF-T) program, which will use mentoring and skills training within an innovative positive youth development (PYD) framework to promote adaptive functioning and prevent adverse outcomes. Graduate student mentors will deliver 9 months of prevention programming in teenagers' homes and communities. Mentors will focus on helping youth set and reach goals that will improve their functioning in five targeted "REACH" domains: Relationships, Education, Activities, Career, and Health. In reaching those goals, mentors will help youth build social-emotional skills associated with preventing adverse outcomes (e.g., emotion regulation, communication, problem solving). The randomized controlled trial will enroll 234 racially and ethnically diverse 8th and 9th grade youth (117 intervention, 117 control), who will provide data at baseline prior to randomization, immediately post-program and 15 months post program follow-up. The aims of the study include testing the efficacy of FHF-T for high-risk 8th and 9th graders in preventing adverse outcomes and examining whether better functioning in positive youth development domains mediates intervention effects. It is hypothesized that youth randomly assigned to the FHF-T prevention condition, relative to youth assigned to the control condition, will evidence better functioning on indices of positive youth development in the REACH domains leading to better long-term outcomes, including adaptive functioning, high school graduation, career attainment/employment, healthy relationships, and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Child Abuse
  • Child Neglect
  • Risk Behavior
  • Delinquency
  • Mental Health Impairment
  • Substance Use
  • Educational Problems
  • Adolescent Development
  • Adolescent Behavior
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Child Maltreatment

Keywords

  • Mentoring
  • Positive Youth Development
  • Skills training
  • Relationships
  • Child Welfare
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Teens with open child welfare cases placed in foster care, kinship care or living at home
  • Starting 8th or 9th grade
  • History of child maltreatment according to child welfare and court records
  • Live within 35 minutes of the University of Denver (for mentoring feasibility)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Youth with a known history of severe violent behavior and/or sexual perpetration
  • Youth who are deemed unsafe or unable to participate in a community-based mentoring program by their caseworker
  • Incarcerated at baseline
  • Moderate or severe developmental delay or physical disability
  • Youth who are/will be parenting during the prevention program
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
234 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FHF-T Intervention Group

    9 months of 1:1 youth mentoring by graduate-student mentors; workshops; educational advocacy

    Behavioral: FHF-T

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Services as usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralFHF-T

    FHF-T employs mentoring, consisting of relationship development, advocating for and empowering youth, and skill-building activities to promote positive youth development. Mentors meet individually for 2-3 hours per week for 30 weeks with each teen they mentor, in order to engage teens in positive youth development activities and provide skills training in areas including emotion recognition, perspective-taking, problem solving, effective communication, managing anger, healthy coping and resisting peer pressure for deviant activities. Youth also attend group workshops over the course of the program, in which they engage with other participants and mentors in skill-building activities.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Court filings for delinquency immediately post intervention

    Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior

    Time frame: immediately post-intervention (T2)

  2. Court filings for delinquency 15 months-post intervention

    Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior

    Time frame: 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  3. Self-reported delinquency immediately post intervention

    The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency

    Time frame: immediately post-intervention (T2)

  4. Self-reported delinquency 15 months-post intervention

    The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency

    Time frame: 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  5. School suspensions immediately post intervention

    Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: immediately post-intervention (T2)

  6. School suspensions 15 months-post intervention

    Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  7. Substance use immediately post intervention

    Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: immediately post-intervention (T2)

  8. Substance use 15 months-post intervention

    Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  9. Passing grades immediately post intervention

    Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure

    Time frame: immediately post-intervention (T2)

  10. Passing grades 15 months-post intervention

    Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure

    Time frame: 15-months-post intervention (T3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life

    Self-reported mean quality of life as measured by the Life Satisfaction Scale (Andrews \& Withey, 1976)

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  2. Extracurricular activity involvement

    Self-reported number and frequency of extracurricular activity involvement will be measured by The Activities Scale, a project-designed measure.

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  3. Connectedness to school

    Self-reported school connection will be measured by the mean score on the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale (Goodenow, 1993) which assesses attachment and emotional response to a school environment.

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  4. Academic achievement

    Academic Achievement will be assessed using standard scores on The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Screener (WIAT Screener; Psychological Corporation, 1992).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  5. Perceived Opportunities

    Self-reported perceived opportunities will be assessed using mean scores on the Perceived Opportunities scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  6. Trauma symptoms

    Self-reported trauma symptoms will be assessed using mean total and subscale scores of the Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC; Briere, 1996).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  7. Internalizing symptoms

    Self-reported internalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the internalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  8. Externalizing symptoms

    Self-reported externalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the externalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  9. Dating violence

    Self-reported dating violence will be measured by The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI; Wolfe, Scott, Wekerle, \& Pittman, 2001).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  10. Coping skills

    Self-reported coping skills will be measured using the mean scores on the subscales of the Children's Coping Strategies Checklist (Program for Prevention Research, 1999).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  11. Conflict management skills

    Self-reported conflict management skills will be measured using the mean score on the conflict management subscale of the Safe Dates Evaluation Questionnaire (Foshee, Bauman, Bennett, Suchindran, Benefield, \& Linder, 2005).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  12. Self-efficacy

    Self-reported self-efficacy will be measured by the mean score on the Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (Cowen, Work, Hightower, Wyman, Parker, \& Ltyczewski, 1991).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  13. Resiliency

    Self-reported resiliency will be measured using standardized scores on The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA; Prince-Embury, 2006, 2007).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  14. Help seeking behaviors

    Self-reported help seeking will be measured by the number of identified social network members from whom the youth seek help and the frequency of seeking help on The Help Seeking Behaviors Scale (Pham, Y. K., McWhirter, E. H., \& Murray, C., 2014).

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  15. Use of protection while having sex

    Self-report of using protection while having sex, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    Time frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Denver
    Denver, Colorado 80208, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Taussig H, Weiler L, Rhodes T, Hambrick E, Wertheimer R, Fireman O, Combs M. Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Program. J Soc Social Work Res. 2015 Dec;6(4):617-642. doi: 10.1086/684021. PubMed 27019678 ↗
  • Taussig, H.N., Bender, K., Bennett, R. Massey Combs, K., Fireman, O, & Wertheimer, R. (2020). Mentoring for teens with child welfare involvement: Permanency outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens program. Child Welfare, 97(5), 1-24.
  • Taussig, H., Bender, K., Racz, S. & Evidence Based Policy Team, A. V. (2022, April 7). Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens. Retrieved from osf.io/673eu.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Analytic code

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03707366
Lead sponsor
University of Denver
Responsible party
Heather Taussig (Professor and Associate Dean for Research, University of Denver) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2018
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Sep 1, 2044 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Heather Taussig, PhD
principal investigator · University of Denver
Kimberly Bender, PhD
principal investigator · University of Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion