CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03697759selfBACKUpdated Feb 28, 2019

A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - PILOTSTUDY

An interventional study of Usual care + selfBACK in Low Back Pain, sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-28.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The pilot study precedes a larger randomized controlled trial, to be starting in February 2019.

In this pilot study all participants are allocated to the intervention group.

The intervention consists of a digital decision support system delivering a weekly plan of suggested activities that the participant can use to self-manage their low back pain. The plan is presented to the participant in the selfBACK app.

Read the detailed description

The selfBACK intervention consists of the selfBACK system, that provides the participants with an individually tailored weekly plan of suggested activities to use in their self-management of low back pain.

The SELFBACK system constitutes a data-driven predictive decision support system that uses Case-Based Reasoning methodology to capture and reuse participant cases in order to suggest the most suitable self-management plan for participants. The selfBACK system is an intelligent system that will adjust the suggested self-management plan to the individual participants by using the information available on the participant (baseline questionnaires), weekly self-reported of changes in health status through the app, and data on physical activity via the step-detecting wristband.

The weekly plan includes three categories of content; 1) information/education, 2) physical activity monitoring through wearing a step-detecting wristband, and 3) strength and flexibility exercises.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Digital Decision Support System
  • App
  • Self-management
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Seeking care from primary health-care practice or a specialised outpatient hospital facility (DK) for non-specific LBP within the past 8 weeks
  • LBP of any duration
  • Mild-to severe pain-related disability rated as 16 or below on the PROMIS-PF4 function scale.
  • Age: ≥18 years
  • Own and regularly use a smart phone (with at least Android 7.0 or iOS11.0) with internet access (Wi-Fi and/or mobile data)
  • Have a working email address and have access to a computer with internet access to complete questionnaires in a web browser.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not interested
  • Unable to speak, read or write in the national language (Danish/ Norwegian)
  • Cognitive impairment or learning disabilities
  • Pathology, such as fracture, cancer, inflammatory diseases, and signs of radiculopathy (severe leg pain, loss of leg strength, or loss of or altered sensation in a myotomal or dermatomal distribution)
  • Serious mental illness, such as major depression, schizophrenia, and psychosis
  • Terminal illness
  • Unable to take part in exercise/physical activity (such as non-ambulatory patients, use of walking aids/assistance, unable to get down and up from the floor independently)
  • Fibromyalgia (diagnosed by a Health Care Professional)
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous back surgery
  • Ongoing participation in other research trials for LBP management
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Usual care + selfBACK

    Participants will use the selfBACK system and app

    Other: Usual care + selfBACK

Interventions

  • OtherUsual care + selfBACK

    The selfBACK intervention is a digital Decision Support System (DSS) for self-management of LBP provided to the participant via a smartphone app (selfBACK app). In addition, the participant is provided with a step-detecting wristband (Xiaomi Mi Band 2) that interacts with the selfBACK app. The DSS provides individually tailored self-management plans including content from three categories; 1) information/education, 2) physical activity monitoring through wearing the step-detecting wristband, and 3) strength and flexibility exercises. The weekly plans are individually tailored to the specific patient, using the data available from the patient, and each week the patients report back their progress on physical activity (step count) and exercise (volume completed). These data are matched with the patients follow-up data to create a self-management plan that is up to date and adaptable to variation in health-status of the individual patient.

    Also known as: selfBACK digital decision support system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The primary outcome is the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) assessing pain-related disability. The questionnaire includes 24 items asking participants to indicate if they experience functional impairments by answering "yes" or "no" to a series of descriptions of functional abilities with higher scores indicating higher level of disability.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity measured as average and worst within the past week. Measured on a 0 - 10 Numerical Rating Scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable. Pain duration measures patients' selfreported length of current pain episode. Pain medication measures the frequency of the non-prescription pain medication use for low back pain.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  2. The Fear avoidance Belief Questionnaire

    The FABQ is a 5-item questionnaire, where the participants score their beliefs about their LBP on an ordinal scale ranging from zero \[completely disagree\] to six \[completely agree\]

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  3. Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    The questionnaire assesses the participant's level of confidence in carrying out specific activities despite their pain \[52, 53\]. The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero \[completely disagree\] to six \[completely agree\].

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  4. Activity limitation

    Activity Limitation evaluates if LBP has limited work and leisure time activities. The questionnaire consists of two single items with response options "yes" and "no".

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  5. Workability

    Work Ability is measured by a single-item and rated on an 11-point NRS scale ranging from zero \[completely unable to work\] to 10 \[work ability at its best\].

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  6. Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale

    Participants indicate their amount of time per week performing leisure activities with four levels of intensity ranging from sedentary to vigorous physically active

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  7. Patient Specific Functional Scale

    Participants rate their function on up to two self-selected activities, are asked to rate if they are unable to do or are having difficulty with the their ability to perform self-selected activities regarded as important by the participants themselves

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  8. Sleep

    Sleep is assessed by self-report using four items concerning problems with falling asleep, waking up repeatedly, waking up too early, and feeling sleepy during the day.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  9. Perceived Stress Scale

    a 10-item questionnaire asking about frequency of thoughts and feelings related to perceived stress

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  10. Health-related Quality of Life

    The EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire is used to asses quality of life within each of the five dimension (i.e., mobility, self-care, activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression).

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  11. Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire

    the questionnaire evaluates the participants' illness perception in an 8-item questionnaire. Items are scored on an ordinal scale ranging from zero \[no problems\] to 10 \[worst severity\].

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  12. Patient Health Questionnaire-8

    the questionnaire is an 8-item questionnaire used to evaluate the participants' depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale scoring frequency of experiencing symptoms of depression.

    Time frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks

  13. Patients Global Perceived effect

    a single item question for Patient's Global Perceived Effect will be asked at follow-up, where participants are asked to rate improvement or deterioration of their LBP compared to before the intervention

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  14. Patient Acceptable Symptom State

    a single item question on whether or not the patient considers their current symptom state as acceptable or not

    Time frame: 6 weeks.

  15. Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire

    The Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire concerns patients' perceived support for autonomy in a virtual care setting.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  16. User ratings

    Three rating questions on overall rating, ease of use and recommendation to others scored on a 5-point system

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Tailoring variables

    Participants in the intervention are on a weekly basis asked a set of tailoring questions. These are tracked over the intervention period. The tailoring questions include items on pain (NRS for pain intensity), function, fear-avoidance, work ability, sleep, pain self-efficacy, stress, symptoms of depression, and barriers for self-management. Note. not all questions are asked on a weekly basis

    Time frame: Weekly for 6 weeks

  2. Physical activity

    The patients' weekly recommended step count goal, and the actual achieved step count per. day

    Time frame: weekly for 6 weeks

  3. Exercise volume

    The patients report back their completed exercise volume as number of set and repetitions for their suggested exercises, when they perform them

    Time frame: weekly for 6 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Physical Activity and Health at Work, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark
    Odense, 5230, Denmark
  • Norwegian University of Science and Techonology
    Trondheim, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bach K, Szczepanski T, Aamodt A, Gundersen OE, Mork. PJ. Case Representation and Similarity Assessment in the selfBACK Decision Support System ICCBR 2016: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development pp 32-46
  • Sandal LF, Overas CK, Nordstoga AL, Wood K, Bach K, Hartvigsen J, Sogaard K, Mork PJ. A digital decision support system (selfBACK) for improved self-management of low back pain: a pilot study with 6-week follow-up. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 23;6:72. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00604-2. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32489674 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03697759
Lead sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Collaborators
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark, University of Glasgow, Robert Gordon University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2018
Start date
Aug 20, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 5, 2019
Completion
Feb 17, 2019
Last update
Feb 28, 2019

Study contacts

Karen Søgaard, PhD
principal investigator · University of Southern Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion