CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03697525Updated Mar 25, 2020

Repeated Muscle Vibration in Acute Stroke

An interventional study of Vibration in Acute Stroke, sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-25.

Sponsored by University of Roma La Sapienza · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Sep 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

prospective randomized double-blind sham-controlled study aimed to investigate the effects of Repeated Muscle Vibration (rMV) on motor recovery in acute stroke patients, treated within 72 hours from symptoms onset

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. After enrollment (T-0), patients are randomly placed into the vibration group (VG) or the control group (CG), by using a computer-generated randomization list. VG patients receive rMV treatment while those of CG receive the sham one. Both treatments are carried out during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after enrollment. Physiokinesitherapy (PT) is carried out in all patients every day, starting soon after T-0 clinical evaluation. Patients are re-evaluated after 4 ± 1 days (T-1), at the end of treatment.

Upon admission, all participants' demographic details and medical history are recorded. All patients undergo a clinical examination, performed at all time-points by an experienced investigator, blinded to group assignment and different from the recruiting one. Clinical evaluation consists of stroke severity evaluation, by means of NIH Stroke Scale; motor and functional limbs abilities are evaluated by using both the Fugl-Meyer scale and the Motricity Index; post-stroke spasticity is assessed with Ashworth scale, modified by Bohannon and Smith.

All participants undergo a daily rehabilitation program. The physical therapist is instructed about duration, frequency, and content of therapy in order to ensure uniformity in treatment procedures, and blinded to patients' treatment allocation.

Low-amplitude rMV (frequency 100 Hz; amplitude range 0.2-0.5 mm) is applied over the flexor carpi radialis and the biceps brachii for the upper limb treatment, and/or over the quadriceps femoris for the lower limb treatment, by means of a specific commercial device (Cro®System, NEMOCOsrl).

The rMV treatment is carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (for each treated limb), interspersed with a 5-minute break.

During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle.

Otherwise, the CG participants undergo the sham rMV by positioning the vibrator close to the tendon but without touching the skin. In this condition, patients are only subject to the faint buzzing sound of the vibrator

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • repetitive muscle vibration (rMV)
  • acute stroke
  • motor recovery
  • nonpharmacological therapy
  • bedside intervention
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Roma La Sapienza is the lead sponsor of 388 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age >18,
  • first ever stroke detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computer Tomography (CT) scan
  • ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 72 hours from symptom onset
  • motor deficit of the upper and/or lower limb;
  • ability to perform at least a minimal isometric voluntary contraction of the affected limb

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • TIA, or rapidly improving stroke
  • cerebral venous thrombosis
  • patients presenting with aphasia, neglect, or apraxia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vibration Group (VG)

    VG participants undergo rMV treatment, carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (for each treated limb), interspersed with a 5-minute break. During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle

    Device: Vibration

  • Sham comparator
    Control Group (CG)

    CG participants undergo the sham rMV by positioning the vibrator close to the tendon but without touching the skin. In this condition, patients were only subject to the faint buzzing sound of the vibrator. Sham rMV treatment is carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (for each treated limb), interspersed with a 5-minute break. During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle

    Device: Vibration

Interventions

  • DeviceVibration

    Low-amplitude rMV (frequency 100 Hz; amplitude range 0.2-0.5 mm) is applied over the flexor carpi radialis and the biceps brachii for the upper limb treatment, and/or over the quadriceps femoris for the lower limb treatment, by means of a specific commercial device (Cro®System, NEMOCOsrl).

    Also known as: Repeated (focal) Muscle Vibration (rMV)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor Recovery

    Motor recovery is expressed as the differences over time (from T-0 to T-1) between the two groups concerning Motricity Index scale scores. The Motricity Index is an ordinal scale that evaluates motor skills and functional limbs in patients with neurological diseases. The movements object of the evaluation are in total 6 (3 for each limb) The scores range from 0 (i.e. no movement) to 33 (ie normal movements) for a maximum of 100 for each limb.

    Time frame: 4 ± 1 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motor Recovery within/associated to synergies

    Motor recovery occurring within/associated to synergies is expressed as the differences over time (from T-0 to T-1) between the two groups concerning Fugl-Meyer scale scores. This scale consists of 10 subtests (6 subtests for the upper limb and 4 for the lower limbs), which evaluate the movements occurring within the synergies (flexor or extensor) and the movements that occur with the association of synergies. It consists of 50 items and provides a maximum score of 100 points, which corresponds to normal traction (66 points for the upper limb, 34 for the lower one) and a minimum score of 0 (no traction)

    Time frame: 4 ± 1 days

  2. Stroke Recovery

    Stroke recovery is expressed as the differences over time (from T-0 to T-1) between the two groups concerning NIH Stroke Scale scores. This scale assesses the stroke severity; it consists of 11 items and the total score goes from a minimum of 0 = normal neurological examination at a maximum of 42, severe severe neurological deficit.

    Time frame: 4 ± 1 days

  3. Spasticity Recovery

    Post-stroke Spasticity is assessed with Ashworth scale, modified by Bohannon and Smith. The total score goes from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (maximum spasticity grade)

    Time frame: 4 ± 1 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome
    Rome, 00184, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03697525
Lead sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza
Responsible party
Vittorio Di Piero (Associate Professor, University of Roma La Sapienza) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 5, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018
Completion
Mar 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 25, 2020

Study contacts

Vittorio Di Piero, Prof
principal investigator · Università di Roma La Sapienza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion