CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03697369Updated Oct 5, 2018

Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pumps

An observational study in T1DM, sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center. Completed. Open to participants aged Up to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-05.

Sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
Up to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: The use of insulin pumps in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes(T1D) has expanded, with lack of data comparing between the different devices.

Objective: to compare prospectively glycemic control, technical difficulties and quality of life (QOL) between 3 pump devices during the first year of use .

Methods: a prospective observational trial, based on clinical data retrieved during 12 months of follow- up. Inclusion criteria included T1D patients, ages 1-18 years, who started pump therapy as part of their clinical care in 4 university affiliated medical centers. The devices fully reimbursed by national health insurance are: MiniMed™ 640G , MiniMed® Veo™, Animas® Vibe®, and Abbott Omnipod®. Comparison parameters included quality of life (QOL), frequency of technical difficulties, skin reactions, discontinuation rate, glycated hemoglobin (HBA1C), mean glucose, total daily insulin dose (TDD) , pump setting parameters and BMI.

02

Conditions studied

  • T1DM
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 120 across 748 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 258 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population included all individuals with T1D ages 0-20 years who switched management modality from MDI to pump as part of their clinical care, and were managed by the pediatric diabetes teams from the AWeSoMe Study Group ( four pediatric diabetes multidisciplinary clinics in Israel; Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, and Maccabi National Juvenile Diabetes Center).

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of T1D recorded by a pediatric endocrinologist
  • Attending periodic clinic visits, and starting pump mode of therapy between May 2015 and March 2017.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No restrictions on HbA1c value at study recruitment or on use of CGMS -
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Observation group

    Individuals with T1D ages 0-20 years who switched management modality from MDI to pump as part of their clinical care and were followed up prospectively in the next 12 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical difficulties differences

    All patients were asked 5 questions regarding monthly frequency of technical problems including the need to use extra sets and the level of pain at catheter insertion

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  2. Quality Of Life (QOL)

    QOL assessment was performed utilizing The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires (DTSQ) for teens and for parents, separately \[14\]. The teens DTSQ contained 12 items scores on six-point scales, of which 9 were summed, the parents DTSQ contained 14 items, of which 9 were summed. Maximal grade was 42.

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  3. Skin reactions differences

    skin assessment at the pump insertion site (itching and redness).

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  4. Discontinuation rate differences

    Comparison between constant pump users and those who discontinued

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Glycemic control and metabolic parameters differences: Insulin TDD

    The difference in glycemic control parameters and metabolic parameters after 3, 6 and 12 months of follow up, between the pumps devices. Insulin TDD, as reported by pump printout data

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  2. Glycemic control and metabolic parameters differences: HbA1c%

    The difference in HbA1c% as measured by each center ll local lab.

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  3. Glycemic control and metabolic parameters differences:Glucose Mean & SD

    Glucose Mean \& SD as recorded by SMBG

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  4. Glycemic control and metabolic parameters differences:Number of SMBG per day

    Data derived from data recorded by SMBG

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

  5. Glycemic control and metabolic parameters differences:BMI SDS

    according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts scale

    Time frame: 2 years from patient first enrollment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03697369
Lead sponsor
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Collaborators
Wolfson Medical Center, Sheba Medical Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2018
Start date
May 31, 2015
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2017
Completion
Aug 31, 2017
Last update
Oct 5, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion