CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03679871Updated Dec 5, 2019

Spiritual Assessment in Chronic Pain Patients

An interventional study of Questionnaire validation in Chronic Pain and Spirituality, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 6 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-05.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The World Health Organization's (WHO) understanding of health(care) is incrementally incorporating the spiritual dimensions equivalent to the physical, psychological and social ones. Yet, it remains widely neglected in multi-modal, interprofessional chronic pain therapy. To support gaining access to chronic pain patients' spiritual needs and concerns within therapy, a screening tool has been constructed based on foregoing qualitative research and literature. The screening tool is to be validated with chronic pain patients in clinical settings.

Read the detailed description

Addressing spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain therapy is in line with the World Health Organization's (WHO) understanding of health(care) and would improve health care for this patient group. An applicable screening tool for chronic pain patients' spiritual concerns and needs must be empirically based. Based on preceding focus group interviews with patients and with health care professionals in various clinical settings and literature analysis, a screening tool has been constructed. This tool aims at supporting health care professionals as well as chronic pain patients in gaining access to spiritual concerns and needs for incorporation in multi-modal, interprofessional pain therapy. In this project the screening tools' psychometric properties will be tested with in five distinct clinical in- and out-patient settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Spirituality

Browse trials for

03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 699 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 60 across 2,160 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Sufficient command of German language as assessed by local study coordinator
  • Confirmed medical and/or nursing diagnosis of chronic pain
  • Suffering pain for ≥ 6 months
  • Pain intensity was≥ 5 on a 11-point numeric Rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during the last episode of pain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life threatening diagnosis (e.g. cancer) that would introduce end-of-life topics as primary aspect
  • Cognitive disorders that would impair participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Questionnaire validation

    22-items questionnaire "Spiritual Resources and Distress"

    Other: Questionnaire validation

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaire validation

    Participants will fill in the questionnaire "Spiritual Resources and Distress"plus additional questionnaires required for validation purposes. Three weeks later, a sub-sample will fill in the questionnaire one more time for consistency testing (test-retest)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Psychometric properties of "Spiritual Resources and Distress" questionnaire

    Validity, internal consistency and stability of "Spiritual Resources and Distress" questionnaire

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Klinik SGM Langenthal
    Langenthal, Bern 4900, Switzerland
  • Zürcher RehaZentrum Davos
    Davos, Graubünden 7272, Switzerland
  • Schweizer Paraplegiker Zentrum, Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin
    Nottwil, Luzern 2607, Switzerland
  • Arztpraxis Professor Sprott
    Zürich, 8033, Switzerland
  • Universitätsspital Zürich, Institut für Anästhesiologie, Schmerzambulatorium
    Zürich, 8091, Switzerland
  • Universitätsspital Zürich, Klinik für Konsiliarpsychiatrie und Psychosomatik
    Zürich, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Perrin J, Streeck N, Naef R, Rufer M, Peng-Keller S, Rettke H. Comparing perspectives: patients' and health care professionals' views on spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 26;21(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06508-y. PubMed 34039337 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03679871
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Collaborators
Swiss National Science Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 20, 2018
Start date
Oct 22, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2019
Completion
Nov 13, 2019
Last update
Dec 5, 2019

Study contacts

Michael Rufer, Prof., MD
principal investigator · University of Zurich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion