CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03674879Updated Sep 18, 2018

Impact of Mobile Text Messaging on Follow Up Rates After Discharge From the Pediatric Emergency Department

An interventional study of Text Message in Duty to Recontact, sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-18.

Sponsored by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
PI left facility
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the effectiveness of text message versus voice call as a method of contact for providing results of diagnostic tests and assuring ongoing care from the pediatric emergency department.

Read the detailed description

The investigators plan to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare two means of contacting patients and their caregivers after discharge from the emergency department in order to provide results of tests: text messaging (intervention group) vs. telephone call (standard group).

02

Conditions studied

  • Duty to Recontact

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Follow Up
  • Text Messaging
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patients under the age of 18 who have had diagnostic testing without finalized results prior to discharge from the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted patients
  • Patients transferred to another facility
  • Patients with critical values as results
  • Do not have devices that can receive phone and text messages
  • Cannot read English or Spanish
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Phone Call

    Follow up contact is attempted via phone call.

  • Experimental
    Text Message

    Follow up contact is attempted via text message.

    Other: Text Message

Interventions

  • OtherText Message

    Patient contact attempted with text message.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of phone call or text message attempts to successful contact with study participant

    A study practitioner will make one attempt per business day to contact the patient or caregiver to provide test results and arrange follow-up care; the method will be determined by the study arm to which the participant is assigned. Participants in the standard practice control arm will receive a telephone call. If a call is not answered, a voice message will be left instructing the patient/parent to call the Pediatric Follow-Up Office. Participants in the intervention arm will receive a text message using the same script. A successful contact will be recorded when a practitioner speaks directly to the patient or parent/guardian via phone.

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dudas RA, Pumilia JN, Crocetti M. Pediatric caregiver attitudes and technologic readiness toward electronic follow-up communication in an urban community emergency department. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):493-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0166. Epub 2013 Apr 9. PubMed 23570276 ↗
  • Horne A, Ros SP. Telephone follow-up of patients discharged from the emergency department: how reliable? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995 Jun;11(3):173-5. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199506000-00008. PubMed 7651874 ↗
  • Levitt MA, Johnson S, Engelstad L, Montana R, Stewart S. Clinical management of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in a county teaching emergency department--concerns in overtreatment, undertreatment, and follow-up treatment success. J Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;25(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(03)00131-8. PubMed 12865101 ↗
  • Neuner B, Fleming M, Born R, Weiss-Gerlach E, Neumann T, Rettig J, Lau A, Schoenfeld H, Kallischnigg G, Spies C. Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jan;68(1):133-40. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.133. PubMed 17149527 ↗
  • Reed JL, Huppert JS, Taylor RG, Gillespie GL, Byczkowski TL, Kahn JA, Alessandrini EA. Improving sexually transmitted infection results notification via mobile phone technology. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Nov;55(5):690-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 21. PubMed 24962503 ↗
  • Reed JL, Simendinger L, Griffeth S, Kim HG, Huppert JS. Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections increases awareness and short-term abstinence in adolescent women. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Mar;46(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 12. PubMed 20159505 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03674879
Lead sponsor
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2018
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2018

Study contacts

Czer Anthoney E Lim, MD
principal investigator · Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion