An interventional study of Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) in Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Terminated at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-03.
Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this study is to study the safety and tumor response of ACE for large HCC.
Transarterial treatment has been playing an important role in the treatment algorithm for patients with multifocal or large intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for surgical resection, transplantation, or local ablative therapy. Among the patient group with intermediate tumor stage, in which the tumor dimension exceeds 10cm, the treatment outcome of conventional chemoembolization (cTACE), chemoembolization using drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and radioembolization using yttrium 90 is generally unsatisfactory. Some would consider HCC of size >10cm a relative contraindication for cTACE because of the poor treatment outcome. However, there is no better alternative treatment for local control of these tumors. Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin has been found to be highly effective for local control of HCC as compared to cTACE in a case-control study. It is hypothesized that ACE is safe and effective for local control of large HCC of size >10cm.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,163 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 45 across 5,174 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin
Procedure: Ablative chemoembolization (ACE)
Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin
Time to progression
the interval between the first treatment date and the date of radiological progression, including intralesional progression, extralesional progression, or extra-hepatic progression
Time frame: 3 to 6 months after treatment
Tumor response
Tumor response at 3 month and 6 month from the date of first treatment as evaluated by triphasic contrast enhanced CT according to the EASL criteria
Time frame: 3 to 6 months after treatment
This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chinese University of Hong Kong