CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03661190STARTUpdated May 4, 2026Results posted

Online Grammatical Reasoning Training for Older Adults

An interventional study of Grammatical Reasoning and Card Pairs in Healthy Aging, sponsored by University of Exeter. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by University of Exeter · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Jul 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6,544
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The START study will investigate the impact of playing a Grammatical Reasoning brain training task on overall brain function (cognition) and day-to-day function in people over 50.

.

Read the detailed description

The study builds on existing work that has shown very promising results with brain training approaches in older adults. There is good evidence that playing brain training games leads to improvements in brain functions including memory and reasoning. There is also a suggestion that regular involvement in brain training games might help reduce the risk of cognitive decline and dementia later in life. It appears that reasoning, or problem-solving, is particularly important as it is one of the first abilities to decline with age. This study will use this evidence to target reasoning in a specific brain training task. It will also explore the potential role of genetic factors in how people perform in the task.

The study will compare the impact of a Grammatical Reasoning Task (START) with a control task consisting of simple picture-matching. Over 7000 participants will be randomly allocated to either START or the control and will be asked to play the task as often as they wish for a period of six weeks. Both tasks will be delivered entirely online so people will access the study from home on their computers. This will be achieved through our dedicated online research platform, PROTECT, which hosts a cohort of over 20,000 older adults who have provided DNA samples as part of a longitudinal study.

This study will measure the impact of the training on cognition and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Assessments will be completed online at baseline, two/six weeks and six months. Overall, this study aims to generate exciting new data about how brain training could be included in guidance on healthy ageing

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Aging
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Exeter is the lead sponsor of 138 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults over 50
  • Access to a computer with a keyboard and the internet
  • Participant registered on the PROTECT study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
6,544 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Grammatical Reasoning

    This group will complete a short-term Intensive Grammatical Reasoning cognitive task delivered online by Wesnes Cognition Ltd (START). Participants will be encouraged to complete the START training once a day for six-weeks.

    Other: Grammatical Reasoning

  • Other
    Control - Card Pairs

    The control group will complete a basic picture-matching task that will provide the same level of engagement, but without the learning effects.

    Other: Card Pairs

Interventions

  • OtherGrammatical Reasoning

    START measures the ability to determine the relationships among different shape combinations which are assigned to grammatical statements about them which can be either correct or incorrect. It is a measure of attention, working memory and executive control.

    Also known as: START

  • OtherCard Pairs

    A basic picture-matching task.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Executive Function From Baseline

    Measured by the validated task-switching test of Trailmaking B. This is a well established computerised test of executive function. On a computer screen participants are presented with 24 circles with either numbers (0-13) or letters (A-L). They must select the circles in the correct numerical and alphabetic order, alternating numbers and letters each time (e.g. 1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc). The test is completed when all the circles have been correctly selected. The test outputs a total score. A higher score indicates a better performance. A negative mean score indicates a decline in performance. The range of scoring for this test is 0 - 300,000. Data reported here are for mean change per group form baseline to six weeks

    Time frame: Baseline to Six weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Numerical Working Memory From Six Weeks

    Digit Span test for numerical working memory. Partifcipants complete a computerised task. They must remember increasingly long strings of digits and repeat them back. Scores are based on correct responses. Higher score means better performance. Score range is 0 - 20

    Time frame: Baseline to six weeks

  2. Change in Working Memory From Baseline

    Measured through a computerised version of the Paired Associate Learning task in which participants must remember the location of a symbol behind a series of boxes on a screen, and accurately identify the correct location when prompted. Scores are based on accuracy. Higher score indicates better performance. Data reported here shows mean change from baseline. Range of scores is 0 - 16

    Time frame: Baseline to six weeks

  3. Change in Reaction Time From Baseline

    Measured through a Simple Reaction time test as part of the Wesnes Cognition Ltd CogTrackTM system. Participants are shown a target symbol on the screen and must react by pressing the keyboard / touching the screen (depending on the device being used) when the target appears. Output is measured in milliseconds as a reaction time variable. Lower scores are better; higher scores are worse. Range of scores is 100 - 30,000

    Time frame: Baseline to six weeks

  4. Change in Episodic Memory From Baseline

    Measured with the Delayed Picture Recognition task in which participants recall a series of images shown earlier in the cognitive test battery. The test outputs percentage of correct answers as the measure. A higher score shows a better outcome. Range output is 0 - 100

    Time frame: Baseline to six weeks

  5. Change in Overall Composite Measure of Global Cognition

    This is a composite measure of overall cognition that is created by normalising the outputs from all other cognitive tests to give a total score out of 100. The data shown here is the change in total score from baseline to six weeks. Range is 0 - 100. A higher score indicates a better outcome

    Time frame: Baseline to six weeks

07

Results

Posted May 4, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Started32793265
Completed17391736
Not completed15401529

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Executive Function From Baseline

Measured by the validated task-switching test of Trailmaking B. This is a well established computerised test of executive function. On a computer screen participants are presented with 24 circles with either numbers (0-13) or letters (A-L). They must select the circles in the correct numerical and alphabetic order, alternating numbers and letters each time (e.g. 1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc). The test is completed when all the circles have been correctly selected. The test outputs a total score. A higher score indicates a better performance. A negative mean score indicates a decline in performance. The range of scoring for this test is 0 - 300,000. Data reported here are for mean change per group form baseline to six weeks

Time frame:
Baseline to Six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Executive Function From Baseline
score on a scaleGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Executive Function From Baseline5435.9 ± 331.809671.19 ± 330.46
SecondaryChange in Numerical Working Memory From Six Weeks

Digit Span test for numerical working memory. Partifcipants complete a computerised task. They must remember increasingly long strings of digits and repeat them back. Scores are based on correct responses. Higher score means better performance. Score range is 0 - 20

Time frame:
Baseline to six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Numerical Working Memory From Six Weeks
score on a scaleGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Numerical Working Memory From Six Weeks0.55 (0.41 to 0.69)0.29 (0.14 to 0.42)
SecondaryChange in Working Memory From Baseline

Measured through a computerised version of the Paired Associate Learning task in which participants must remember the location of a symbol behind a series of boxes on a screen, and accurately identify the correct location when prompted. Scores are based on accuracy. Higher score indicates better performance. Data reported here shows mean change from baseline. Range of scores is 0 - 16

Time frame:
Baseline to six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Working Memory From Baseline
score on a scaleGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Working Memory From Baseline1.90 (1.68 to 2.1)1.09 (0.87 to 1.31)
SecondaryChange in Reaction Time From Baseline

Measured through a Simple Reaction time test as part of the Wesnes Cognition Ltd CogTrackTM system. Participants are shown a target symbol on the screen and must react by pressing the keyboard / touching the screen (depending on the device being used) when the target appears. Output is measured in milliseconds as a reaction time variable. Lower scores are better; higher scores are worse. Range of scores is 100 - 30,000

Time frame:
Baseline to six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · time (milliseconds)
Change in Reaction Time From Baseline
time (milliseconds)Grammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Reaction Time From Baseline10.04 (6.13 to 13.95)3.66 (-0.26 to 7.58)
SecondaryChange in Episodic Memory From Baseline

Measured with the Delayed Picture Recognition task in which participants recall a series of images shown earlier in the cognitive test battery. The test outputs percentage of correct answers as the measure. A higher score shows a better outcome. Range output is 0 - 100

Time frame:
Baseline to six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Episodic Memory From Baseline
score on a scaleGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Episodic Memory From Baseline57.9 (54.77 to 61.03)45.4 (42.27 to 48.53)
SecondaryChange in Overall Composite Measure of Global Cognition

This is a composite measure of overall cognition that is created by normalising the outputs from all other cognitive tests to give a total score out of 100. The data shown here is the change in total score from baseline to six weeks. Range is 0 - 100. A higher score indicates a better outcome

Time frame:
Baseline to six weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Overall Composite Measure of Global Cognition
score on a scaleGrammatical ReasoningControl - Card Pairs
Change in Overall Composite Measure of Global Cognition0.22 (0.18 to 0.28)0.08 (0.04 to 0.12)

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Grammatical Reasoning0/3,279 (0%)0/3,279 (0%)0/3,279 (0%)
Control - Card Pairs0/3,265 (0%)0/3,265 (0%)0/3,265 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Grammatical ReasoningControl - Card PairsTotal
Mean62.4 ± 7.2362.5 ± 7.0862.5 ± 7.15
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Grammatical ReasoningControl - Card PairsTotal
Female261726015218
Male6626641326
Educational Attainment
Educational Attainment(units on a scale)Grammatical ReasoningControl - Card PairsTotal
Mean3.28 ± 1.403.23 ± 1.363.25 ± 1.38
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Grammatical ReasoningControl - Card PairsTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Exeter Medical School
    Exeter, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 14, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication or for secondary data analysis purposes.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03661190
Lead sponsor
University of Exeter
Collaborators
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, Wesnes Cognition Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Start date
Mar 31, 2017
Primary completion
May 31, 2018
Completion
Nov 30, 2018
Results posted
May 4, 2026
Last update
May 4, 2026

Study contacts

Anne Corbett, BSc MRes PhD
principal investigator · University of Exeter Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion