ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03660878Updated Apr 8, 2025Results posted

A Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial of Reproxalap in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) and Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%) in Allergic Conjunctivitis, sponsored by Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial with Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Conjunctivitis
03

In context

Conjunctivitis, Allergic

210 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis, Allergic; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 87 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis, Allergic.

Browse Conjunctivitis, Allergic studies →

Lead sponsor

Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 29 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • be at least 18 years of age of either gender and any race
  • have a positive history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to ragweed pollen as confirmed by the allergic skin test given to the subject within 24 months of the subject's Visit 1
  • have a calculated visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an ETDRS chart

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have known or sensitivities to the use of any of the product medication or components
  • have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium, or a diagnosis of dry eye)
  • have had ocular surgical intervention within three months prior to Visit 1, or during the trial, or a history of refractive surgery six months prior to Visit 1, or have systemic surgery planned during the clinical trial or within 30 days after;
  • have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease
  • have an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal), active uveitis, or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit;
  • be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)

    Drug: Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)

  • Experimental
    Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)

    Drug: Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution

    Drug: Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution

Interventions

  • Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) administered four times a day and an additional four times a day on an as needed basis.

  • Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%) administered four times a day and an additional four times a day on an as needed basis.

  • DrugVehicle Ophthalmic Solution

    Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution administered four times a day and an additional four times a day on an as needed basis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline Ocular Itching Score on High Pollen Days

    Mean change from baseline in ocular itching score using a 0 to 4 scale (0 = least, 4 = most) was assessed on days when peak pollen counts meet or exceed the American Academy of Allergy Asthma \& Immunology weed pollen scale 95th percentile (325 grains per cubic meter). The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from analysis of covariance with baseline, treatment, and day as factors.

    Time frame: Efficacy was assessed on high-pollen days over 28 days of treatment; baseline was assessed approximately one week before dosing.

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
Started181717
Completed171517
Not completed120

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline Ocular Itching Score on High Pollen Days

Mean change from baseline in ocular itching score using a 0 to 4 scale (0 = least, 4 = most) was assessed on days when peak pollen counts meet or exceed the American Academy of Allergy Asthma \& Immunology weed pollen scale 95th percentile (325 grains per cubic meter). The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from analysis of covariance with baseline, treatment, and day as factors.

Time frame:
Efficacy was assessed on high-pollen days over 28 days of treatment; baseline was assessed approximately one week before dosing.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Ocular Itching Score on High Pollen Days
units on a scaleReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)
Change From Baseline Ocular Itching Score on High Pollen Days-0.65 ± 0.170.16 ± 0.18-0.69 ± 0.30

Adverse events

Collected over The period of time over which adverse events were collected for each subject in the clinical trial was approximately five weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)14/18 (77.8%)
Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)0/17 (0%)1/17 (5.9%)16/17 (94.1%)
Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)3/17 (17.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
Central nervous system lesionNervous system disorders0/181/170/17
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
General disorders and administration site conditionsGeneral disorders13/1816/170/17
Skin test positiveInvestigations1/180/171/17
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/181/170/17
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders0/181/170/17
HordeolumInfections and infestations0/180/171/17
Conjunctival disorderEye disorders1/181/170/17
BlepharitisEye disorders0/181/170/17
Dry eyeEye disorders0/181/170/17
Eye dischargeEye disorders0/181/170/17
Eye SwellingEye disorders0/180/171/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years16161648
>=65 years2114
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
Female13111135
Male56617
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
Hispanic or Latino1091130
Not Hispanic or Latino88622
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1001
Black or African American1012
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
White15171648
Unknown0000
Not Reported0000
Other1001
Multiple0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
United States18171752
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Iris Color (Right Eye)(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
Black1012
Blue3328
Brown10101333
Hazel1214
Green3205
Gray0000
Other0000
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Iris Color (Left Eye)(Participants)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%)Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.5%)Vehicle Ophthalmic SolutionTotal
Black1012
Blue3328
Brown10101333
Hazel1214
Green3205
Gray0000
Other0000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Slade & Baker Vision
    Houston, Texas 77027, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cavanagh B, Gomes PJ, Starr CE, Nichols KK, Brady TC. Reproxalap Activity and Estimation of Clinically Relevant Thresholds for Ocular Itching and Redness in a Randomized Allergic Conjunctivitis Field Trial. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1449-1461. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00520-z. Epub 2022 May 18. PubMed 35585427 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2019, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2025, 5 years 4 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Dec 2020.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2018
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
StartActual
Sep 8, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 19, 2019
CompletionActual
Nov 19, 2019
Results delay requested
Dec 2, 2020
Results first posted
Apr 8, 2025
Last update
Apr 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03660878
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Start date
Sep 8, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 19, 2019
Completion
Nov 19, 2019
Results posted
Apr 8, 2025
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Reproxalap

Start the discussion