An interventional study of application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution and application of a placebo (tonic water) in Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 5 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-05.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objective of this proposed clinical study is to compare the success rates of ART restorations placed in untreated and SDF-treated dentine caries lesions in primary teeth. The secondary objective is to describe the change in parents' satisfaction with the aesthetics of their child's teeth and the change in oral health-related quality of life of preschool children before and after placement of ART restorations.
The study population is preschool children attending kindergartens in different districts in Hong Kong. Children attending grades 1 or 2 in nine kindergartens were invited to receive a free dental examination and had their decayed primary teeth restored, if possible, in the kindergarten by dentists. Parental informed consent was obtained before the dental examination and treatment. Half of the children with decayed primary teeth needing restorations were assigned randomly to receive SDF treatment around 10 weeks before receiving the restoration. The restored teeth were re-examined every 6 months for 24 months to assess the treatment outcome. Parents of the study children were asked to complete a questionnaire at baseline, 6 months and 24 months so as to obtain data on their satisfaction with the aesthetics of their child's teeth and the oral health-related quality of life of the study children.
The study population of this proposed study is Hong Kong preschool children. Children attending grade 1 or 2 in nine selected kindergartens were invited to join this study. An invitation letter with information on the purpose and procedures of the study was sent to the parents of the children through the kindergarten. The parents were asked to give written consent for allowing their child to receive a free oral examination and ART restorations, if indicated for treating the decayed primary teeth in their child's mouth, provided by dentists in the kindergarten. Parental consent were obtained before inclusion of a child in this study.
Cavitated caries lesions in the primary teeth of the study children were restored following the ART procedures (Holmgren et al., 2013). The instruments used were LED illuminated dental mirror, sickle probe, tweezers, hatchet, excavators and flat plastic. The dental restorative material used was a high-strength chemical-cured glass ionomer (Ketac-molar, 3M ESPE, Germany).
At the baseline, all children with parental consent were clinically examined in the kindergarten. Disposable dental mirror attached to a handle with an intra-oral LED light and a ball-ended probe was used. The status of each tooth was recorded. Children who had at least one decayed primary tooth with a cavity into dentine were included into the study. All decayed teeth in the children were restored, except those with inadequate access and those with signs of pulpal pathology. The decayed teeth in half of the children received topical application of a SDF solution (Saforide, Toyo Chemical, Japan), through simple random allocation on a child basis using random numbers, around 10 weeks before receiving the restoration. The time used for placement of each restoration was recorded to the nearest minute.
The children were examined at 6 and will be examined at 12, 18 and 24 months after placement of ART restorations by calibrated examiners who were not involved in the placement of the restorations. The same instruments used in the baseline examination were used in the follow-up examinations. The status of the restorations and restored teeth were assessed and recorded using codes and criteria commonly adopted in previous clinical studies of ART restorations (Lo et al., 2007).
At baseline, information on the children's oral hygiene practice, snacking habit, oral health related quality of life, and parental satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth was collected by a self-completed questionnaire. A validated tool for measuring oral health related quality of life of preschool children in Hong Kong, Chinese version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS), was used (Lee et al., 2009). The same measurement tool was used at the 6-month and will be used at 24-month follow-up.
The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution
Device: application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution
application of a placebo (tonic water)
Other: application of a placebo (tonic water)
SDF solution was painted onto the surface of the carious lesion of the tooth
tonic water was painted onto the surface of the carious lesion of the tooth
success of the ART restorations
A restoration is classified as success when it is retained on the tooth without major defects or wear and has no associated active caries.
Time frame: 24 months
parental satisfaction with aesthetics of their child's teeth as reported in the parent's answer to a question on their satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth
parent's answer to a question on their satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth. The question is "How satisfied are you with the overall appearance of your child's teeth?" The answer option is a 5-point scale with 5 being very satisfied, 4 being satisfied, 3 being neutral, 2 being dissatisfied, and 1 being very dissatisfied.
Time frame: 24 months
oral health related quality of life of the child as assessed by the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale
parents' answers to a series of questions in the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale. This scale contains 13 self-completed questions on various aspects of the impact of child oral health on the daily activities of the child or the family. The answer in each question is on a 5-point scale with 0 being no impact and 4 being great impact. The scale score is the summation of the answer scores to the 13, which can range from 0 to 52. The higher the scale score, the more impacts of oral health on life activities and thus lower quality of life.
Time frame: 24 months
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The University of Hong Kong