CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03648138Updated Mar 11, 2020

Testing the Influence of Different Sugary Drink Warning Label Designs

An interventional study of Sugary drink warning labels in Obesity, Weight Gain and Diabetes Type 2, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-11.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,016
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare different sugary drink labels to see which most influence knowledge, beliefs, purchase intentions and choices. Parents of children ages 6-11 will shop in a virtual convenience store after being randomized to 1 of 4 conditions: 1) calorie labels; 2) text warning labels; 3) graphic sugar warning labels; or 4) graphic health warning. This study will provide data comparing the influence of sugary drink text warning labels and two kinds of graphic warning labels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Weight Gain
  • Diabetes Type 2
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,016 is above the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. a primary caregiver of a child 6-to-11 years old;
  2. ≥18 years old; and
  3. can read and speak English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. not a primary caregiver of a child 6-to-11 years old;
  2. \<18 years old; and
  3. cannot read and/or speak English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,016 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Calorie label

    This arm will display a "Calories per Bottle" label on all beverages, not just sugary beverages. This label is identical to the American Beverage Association's current "Clear on Calories" labels (as of 2018).

    Behavioral: Sugary drink warning labels

  • Experimental
    Text warning label

    This arm will display similar text proposed in a recent sugary drink warning label bill in California. Sample text: WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and tooth decay. The calorie label will also appear on all beverages.

    Behavioral: Sugary drink warning labels

  • Experimental
    Sugar graphic warning label

    This arm will graphically display the amount of sugar in each sugary beverage along with the same text used in the "text warning label" arm. The calorie label will also appear on all beverages.

    Behavioral: Sugary drink warning labels

  • Experimental
    Health graphic warning label

    This arm will graphically display potential negative health effects of over consuming sugary drinks for each sugary beverage, along with the same text used in the "text warning label" arm. The calorie label will also appear on all beverages.

    Behavioral: Sugary drink warning labels

Interventions

  • BehavioralSugary drink warning labels

    This information appears in the description of the study arms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hypothetical beverage choice

    Participants will select a beverage to purchase in the virtual store. Our outcome will be the percentage of parents choosing a 20-ounce sugary drink for their child

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Likely to serve or buy these beverages:

    Item: "How likely are you to serve or buy this product for your child in the next 4 weeks?" This will be answered on a 7-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  2. Parent feels good serving the beverages

    Item: "Serving this product to my child would make me feel like I am doing something good for my child." This will be measured on a 7-point likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  3. Child enjoyment of beverages

    Item: "How much do you think your child would enjoy this product?" This will be answered on a 7-point likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  4. Health beliefs and risk perceptions index

    We will create this outcome by summing responses to the following 7 health perception questions 6 prompted with the statement "Drinking this product often would...". The statements end with the following health belief and risk perception language: "lead my child to gain weight," "increase my child's risk of heart disease," "increase my child's risk of diabetes," "make my child feel energized," "help my child focus at school", and "help my child live a healthy life." The other item is: "How healthy do you think this product is for your child?" Responses to questions about weight gain, heart disease, and diabetes will be reverse coded, so higher scores on the index will indicate a stronger positive health perception of the beverages. These will be scored on 7-point likert scales.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  5. Estimate of how many teaspoons of added sugar are in the beverages

    This variable will be measured continuously based on a text box provided to participants.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  6. Perceived amount of added sugar in beverages

    This variable will be measured on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from "too little for my child" to "too much for my child".

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  7. Noticing the label

    Participants will respond "yes," "no," or "I don't know" to the item: "When you selected a beverage to buy for your child at the beginning of this survey, did you notice any labels on the beverages other than calorie information?"

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  8. Perceived label influence

    Participants will respond: "yes", "no," or "I did not notice any labels" in response to the question of whether the label influenced their purchase.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  9. Favor or oppose sugary drink warning label policy

    We will compare the percentage of participants in favor of (combining somewhat favor and strongly favor), opposed to (combining somewhat oppose and strongly oppose), or neutral about the policy based on the following question: "Would you favor or oppose a government policy requiring a warning label to be placed on beverages with added sugars?" Ratings will be from -2 to 2.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  10. Likelihood of label changing thoughts

    Item: "If this government warning label were on a beverage, how much would it change your thoughts about the healthiness of that beverage for your child?" This will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  11. Encourage you to give fewer beverages to your child

    Item: "If you saw this government warning label on a beverage, would the label encourage you to serve your child that beverage less often?" The responses will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  12. How much do you trust the information on this label

    Item: "How much do you trust the information on this label?". Responses will be measured on a 7-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  13. Negative reactions to the label

    We will examine the average negative emotional response to the label (said the warning label made them feel worried, fearful, guilty, or disgusted or grossed out). Each emotion will be scored on a 5-pt likert scale.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Online study with GfK
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share a de-identified dataset via an online data storage website (e.g., open science framework, dataverse, research box)

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03648138
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Drexel University, New York University, University of Connecticut, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Christina Roberto (Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2018
Start date
Jan 17, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2020
Completion
Jan 28, 2020
Last update
Mar 11, 2020

Study contacts

Christina A Roberto, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion