CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03644173Updated Oct 15, 2021Results posted

Personal Resilience Empowerment Program Study

An interventional study of Personal Resilience Empowerment Program including 5 sessions with health coaches in Lung Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Cancer, sponsored by Hackensack Meridian Health. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-15.

Sponsored by Hackensack Meridian Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Personal Resilience Empowerment Program (PREP) at Hackensack Meridian Integrative Health \& Medicine was designed in Legacy Meridian to assist all selected patients with upcoming hospitalization. For the "Personal Resilience Empowerment Program (PREP) in the perioperative setting of surgically treated cancer patients", hereafter "the Project or PREP", the Hackensack Meridian Integrative Health \& Medicine is designing a new pilot program to focus on the needs of oncology patients.

All patients diagnosed with cancer that will undergo a scheduled surgical (Hepato-Biliary, and Thoracic) procedure in Hackensack Meridian Health and specifically in the Jersey Shore University Medical Center, will be eligible to participate (for more details please see eligibility criteria, section 4).

Overall, this pilot project will include 5 coaching sessions and an introductory session/visit that will take place on the physician's office. The initial physician visit will focus on patient eligibility, introduction to the Project, informed consent and a pre-intervention survey and will be conducted by the principal investigator or one of the sub-investigators listed above. The following 5 sessions will be conducted by one of the integrative health coaches/registered nurses (for details please see section 5). A post-intervention survey will be completed during the final session and repeated at one month, and at 3 months from the final session.

The goal of this project is to investigate whether using the PREP as an intervention in patients diagnosed with cancer would result in improving various metrics including improvements to resilience, sleep, activity, purpose, nutrition, empowerment to manage one's own health and well-being, decrease in pain medication use and more rapid return to previous functional status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Liver Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • integrative medicine
  • cancer patients
03

In context

Cholangiocarcinoma

914 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma; 286 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 50 across 687 interventional studies indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma.

Browse Cholangiocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Hackensack Meridian Health is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with cancer of the thoracic (lung), hepatobiliary system (cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic, liver) that will undergo a scheduled surgical procedure
  • Able to understand and sign the informed consent form
  • Willingness to participate in the study and comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide consent
  • Unable to participate at the discretion of the PI based on the ECOG survey (if ECOG >1). See section 5 and appendix 1 for details.
  • Non- English speaking patients .
  • Opioid use for non-malignant pain for greater than 7 days 6 Terminal or Stage 4 cancer.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study arm - PREP Intervention

    Participants receiving the coaching intervention

    Behavioral: Personal Resilience Empowerment Program including 5 sessions with health coaches

Interventions

  • BehavioralPersonal Resilience Empowerment Program including 5 sessions with health coaches

    5 coaching sessions that will take place either in-person or over the phone with a research nurse (RN)-Health Coach. During the sessions, the health coach will focus on introducing the 5 pillars of health and well-being: sleep, activity, purpose, nutrition and resilience. Will introduce breathing techniques participants and will teach patients how to acquire mind-body skills to assist in stress management, learn to thrive by building resilience, feel empowered to manage their health, gain self-care skills to decrease anxiety, pain and nausea naturally, control the stress response and trigger the relaxation response to promote well-being and discover what foods fuel the body in preparation for healing, during recovery and overall health.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

    Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)

  2. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

    Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)

  3. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

    Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)

  4. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

    Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)

  5. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

    Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre-intervention survey and 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  6. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

    Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  7. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

    Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  8. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

    Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  9. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

    Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre-intervention survey and 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

  10. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

    Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

  11. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

    Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

  12. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

    Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

  13. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

    Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Post intervention (survey completed at the end of last coaching session)

  14. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

    Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  15. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

    Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

  16. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

    Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

    Time frame: Post intervention (survey completed at the end of last coaching session)

  17. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

    Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)

  18. Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

    Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

    Time frame: At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)

07

Results

Posted Oct 15, 2021

Participant flow

Participants at Last Visit (Pre-surveys)
Participant flow — Participants at Last Visit (Pre-surveys)
MilestonePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Started37
Completed16
Not completed21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up21
Participants at the 1-month Follow up
Participant flow — Participants at the 1-month Follow up
MilestonePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Started16
Completed12
Not completed4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Death2
Participants at the 3-month Follow up
Participant flow — Participants at the 3-month Follow up
MilestonePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Started12
Completed10
Not completed2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
7-8 hours of sleep/day-1.06 ± 1.95
Waking up rested-0.80 ± 1.97
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Remaining physically active-0.13 ± 1.78
Needing help with everyday activities0.56 ± 1.90
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose-0.19 ± 0.66
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Within two weeks from discharge, following the the post-operative visit (during the same day they would have the post-op visit, last coaching session and the post-intervention survey)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
5-10 servings of fruits/day0.60 ± 1.40
Avoiding fast food1.00 ± 1.56
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre-intervention survey and 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
7-8 hours of sleep/day-0.33 ± 1.23
Waking up rested0.08 ± 1.16
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Remaining physically active0.67 ± 1.23
Needing help with everyday activities-0.08 ± 1.73
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose-0.33 ± 0.89
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
5-10 servings of fruits/day0.45 ± 1.51
Avoiding fast food0.36 ± 1.96
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep

Quality of life concerning sleep (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre-intervention survey and 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Sleep
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
7-8 hours of sleep/day-0.63 ± 1.51
Waking up rested-0.80 ± 1.55
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity

Quality of life concerning activity (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Activity
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Remaining physically active0.70 ± 0.95
Needing help with everyday activities-0.80 ± 1.48
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose

Quality of life concerning feeling of purpose (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Purpose-0.22 ± 0.44
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition

Quality of life concerning nutrition (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Nutrition
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
5-10 servings of fruits/day0.44 ± 1.81
Avoiding fast food0.89 ± 2.42
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Post intervention (survey completed at the end of last coaching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Adapting to changes0.00 ± 0.63
Bouncing back from illness/injury and hardship-0.13 ± 0.64
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Adapting to changes0.00 ± 0.95
Bouncing back from illness/injury and hardship-0.36 ± 0.50
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience

Quality of life concerning resilience (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Resilience
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Adapting to changes0.00 ± 0.87
Bouncing back from illness/injury and hardship-0.11 ± 0.33
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the post intervention survey

Time frame:
Post intervention (survey completed at the end of last coaching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Knowledge to manage own health-0.13 ± 0.52
Being in control of own health and well-being-0.25 ± 1.13
Knowing where to turn in times of crisis/stress-0.13 ± 1.09
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 1-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 1 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 30 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Knowledge to manage own health-0.33 ± 0.49
Being in control of own health and well-being-0.33 ± 0.49
Knowing where to turn in times of crisis/stress-0.25 ± 1.14
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment

Quality of life concerning Empowerment (on 1-5 Likert scale with 1 being the worst and 5 the best in each category) developed for this project. Change between the pre and the 3-month post intervention survey

Time frame:
At 3 month Post intervention (survey was sent at 90 days after the last couching session)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Post Intervention (Coaching Sessions) - Empowerment
scores on a scalePersonal Resilience Empowerment Program
Knowledge to manage own health-0.20 ± 0.42
Being in control of own health and well-being-0.40 ± 0.70
Knowing where to turn in times of crisis/stress-0.22 ± 0.83

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months post-op. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Personal Resilience Empowerment Program (All Visits and Follow up)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Personal Resilience Empowerment Program (Visits Only)2/16 (12.5%)2/16 (12.5%)0/16 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPersonal Resilience Empowerment Program (All Visits and Follow up)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program (Visits Only)
Death due to underlining cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/102/16

Baseline characteristics

Participants who completed the visits (even if they did not complete the follow-up surveys)

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years6
>=65 years10
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program
Mean67.68 (38 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program
Female5
Male11
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White15
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Personal Resilience Empowerment Program
United States16
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hackensack Meridian Health - Jersey Shore University Medical Center
    Neptune, New Jersey 07753, United States
  • Hackensack Meridian Health - Riverview Medical Center
    Red Bank, New Jersey 07701, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 19, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03644173
Lead sponsor
Hackensack Meridian Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2018
Start date
May 30, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 14, 2021
Completion
Jun 14, 2021
Results posted
Oct 15, 2021
Last update
Oct 15, 2021

Study contacts

Ronald Matteotti, MD
principal investigator · Hackensack Meridian Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion