CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03626220Updated Jan 20, 2025Results posted

Acupuncture on Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

An interventional study of acupuncture in Randomized Controlled Trial, Breast Cancer and Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, sponsored by China Medical University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-20.

Sponsored by China Medical University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Peripheral neuropathy is currently the second most common side effect after chemotherapy, second only to the side effects of blood toxicity. A variety of chemotherapy drugs may induce peripheral neurotoxicity and cause by the cumulative dose of chemotherapy drugs. Symptoms include sensory paresthesia, feeling dullness or numbness, glove-like feeling distributed in the palm. The currently most effective way is to interrupt the treatment or adjust the dose of chemotherapeutic drugs, but it is easy to make patients discontinue chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of acupuncture on neurological symptoms and quality of life. Three kinds of questionnaires will be used:(1) Brief pain inventory- short form to assess the extent of pain, and the impact of daily life. (2) the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecologic Oncology Group- Neurotoxicity(FACT/GOG-NTX)-13 (Version 4) to assess changes in neurological symptoms; (3) World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-(WHOQOL-BREF) to assess changes in the quality of life of patients. The course of treatment was evaluated for nine weeks. Changes in neurological function and quality of life will be evaluated before treatment, the third week of treatment, the sixth week of treatment, till the ninth week. The aim of this study is to confirm that acupuncture can improve peripheral neuropathy after chemotherapy, in order to enhance breast cancer patients' quality of life, and provide the new opportunity for integrative therapy between Chinese and Western medicine.

Keywords:acupuncture , chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Read the detailed description

(I) Background of the research A variety of neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, including platinums (e.g. cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin), taxanes (e.g. paclitaxel and docetaxel), and vinca alkaloids (e.g. vincristine and vinblastine), thalidomide and bortezomib, may induce peripheral neuropathy. Generally speaking, sensory nerve dysfunction is more common than motor involvement. It causes hands and feet to feel tingling, dullness or numbness symmetrically, which will be a glove-like ("glove-and-stocking type") sensation distributed in palms and soles. Patient's touch, vibration, and proprioception senses may be impaired under clinical examinations.

chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy(CIPN) relates to the cumulative doses of chemotherapeutic agents. Sometimes, when chemotherapy is stopped, neuropathy symptoms may continue or worsen, which is called a "costing phenomenon". Nerve damaging usually starts from ends of the extremities, while individual doses were accumulated, it gradually extends to proximal joints or ganglions. CIPN is currently the second most common side, next to hematotoxicity. Within thirty days after chemotherapy, 68.1% of patients may develop CIPN, most of which can be relieved or improved, but there are still 30-83% symptoms persist over 6 months.

At present, the most effective way to treat CIPN is to stop the treatment protocol or adjust doses of chemotherapy; however, it affects the effect of chemotherapy in degrading tumor growth. Plenty of pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments are still under investigation, such as antioxidant medication (e.g. Acetyl-L-carnitine, glutamine, vit B12, fish oil, etc.), anxiolytics (e.g. venlafaxine), neuroprotective agents (e.g. infusion of calcium ions, magnesium ions), food supplements, acupuncture, light stimulation, etc. Acupuncture with the advantages of clinically effective, easy-practice and relatively safe, few studies revealed its effect on CIPN, however, there is still a lack of large clinical trials to evaluate its effectiveness.

(ii) Purpose of the research To investigate the efficacy of acupuncture on peripheral neuropathy after chemotherapy administration in patients with breast cancer.

(iii) Importance of the research Current studies revealed that acupuncture might be effective on CIPN, however, insufficient number of participants or lack of control groups limit the quality of clinical studies. Therefore, the aim of our study to conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture on peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Breast Cancer
  • Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  • Acupuncture

Keywords

  • acupuncture
  • chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

China Medical University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 464 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria will be: female more than 20 years of age; breast cancer with early stage at I-III; had completed chemotherapy; the neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents included taxanes, platinums, or others; less than grade three in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status; higher than grade one in National Cancer Institute-common terminology criteria for adverse events(NCI-CTCAE) scale.

The exclusion criteria will be: having less than three months in mean survival time, history of diabetic neuropathy before chemotherapy administration, history of other preexisting peripheral neuropathy, other inflammatory or metabolic arthritis, severe blood coagulation diseases or with latent bleeding tendency, unstable cardiovascular diseases, or other preexisting muscle-skeletal diseases.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The acupuncture group

    Acupuncture treatment will be performed for 9 weeks. Acupuncture treatment will be performed for 9 weeks. The frequency of acupuncture will be twice a week for the first six weeks, and once a week for the following three weeks. 30 minutes needling at each treatment. Acupuncture points include Baihui(GV20), Qihai(CV6), Quchi(LI11), Hegu(LI4), Neiguan(P6), or Shenmen(HT7) for upper limbs. For plantar numbness, choose two acupoints to use in turn; use Weizhong(BL40), Sanyinjiao(SP6), or Zusanli(ST36) for lower limbs. If severe numbness occurred, Taixi(KI3) or Yongquan(K1) should be added for feet numbness. "De qi" sensation, such as soreness, numbness, pain, etc. will be achieved at each acupoints .

    Other: acupuncture

  • Sham comparator
    The controlled group

    Acupuncture with superficial needling 0.5 cun (estimated 1cm with deviation depends on the body size of each participants) away from the acupoints, which only superficially penetrated the skin without feeling of "De Qi" sensation.

    Other: acupuncture

Interventions

  • Otheracupuncture

    More than five years of experienced certified acupuncturists performed all treatments using the study protocol and administered to all participants. The acupoints selection principle was based on the Bi syndrome(the impediment disease) recorded in the Huangdi's Internal Classic, the Traditional Chinese medicine literature. Disposable sterile stainless steel needles (CASOON, Wuxi Jiajian Medical Instrument Company, Limited., Jiangsu, China) with 0.3mm in diameter and 40mm in length, were inserted into the prespecified acupoints

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Average Pain Severity in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF)

    The average pain severity was chosen as the primary assessment as neuropathy symptoms based on its ability to detect neuropathic pain in cancer patients, as well as its use to assess CIPN symptoms in other controlled clinical trials.The BPI-SF assesses pain when responding to the questionnaire (right now) and at its worst, least, and average pain severity in the last 24 h. The items range from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain). The higher the pain severity scores, the worse the degree of pain experienced by the patient. We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis: compared the data at week 6 with baseline, and the data at week 9 with baseline from each group. (2) between group analysis: compared the acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group at week 6 and week 9. (3) the between group differences of the changes from week 6 to baseline and from week 9 to baseline.

    Time frame: We measured the average pain severity 4 times within 9 weeks [at baseline (before the first treatment) and week 3, week 6, and week 9 during the protocol].

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecologic Oncology Group- Neurotoxicity(FACT/GOG-NTX)-13

    The 27-item FACT-G evaluated the quality of life of patients undergoing cancer therapy over the past 7 days. The question is rated on a five-point scale, from 0 to 4 (0= not at all; 4= very much) and summed ( total score range= 0-108). An increase in scores represents an improvement in the overall quality of life.The 13-item Ntx subscale measures the severity and impact of neurotoxicity symptoms over the past seven days. Items are rated on a five-point scale, scored from 0 to 4 and summed ( total score range= 0-52). Higher scores on the neurotoxicity scale indicate improvements in neurotoxic symptoms. The 40-item FACT/GOG-Ntx total score represents the sum of the FACT-G and Ntx subscale (total score range=0-160).The FACT/GOG-Ntx trial outcome index (TOI) contained the scores of the PWB, FWB, and FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale (total score range= 0-104).We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis(2) between group analysis(3) the changes between group analysis

    Time frame: 4 times within 9 weeks: at baseline (before the first treatment) and week 3, week 6, and week 9 during the protocol

  2. World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale(WHOQOL)-BREF (Taiwan Version)

    WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version was validated to be a good clinical tool across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors. There are a total 28 items by adding 2 additional items to account for Taiwanese cultural adaptations. Item scores range from 1 to 5 (1 =the worst condition; 5=the best condition), except for 3 items (Ph1, Ph2, and Ps6), which are reverse coded. Each domain in the scale can be translated into two ranges of domain scores (0-100 and 4-20), and we used 0-100 scale in this study. The Higher scores in each domain indicate the better quality of life for patients with cancers We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis: compared post-treatment with baseline. (2) between group analysis: compared the acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group at week 9. (3) the between group differences of the changes from post-treatment to baseline.

    Time frame: We measured 2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment

  3. Touch Test Sensory Evaluator

    Measurements were performed using a set of 20 von Frey monofilaments(Semmes-Weinstein Von Frey Aesthesiometer, Stoelting Co. 620 Wheat Lane, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.), with evaluator size/target forces from 1.65/0.008 gto 6.65/300 g. Each monofilament was calibrated to a target force in grams (g) within a 5% standard deviation. Thresholds for categories of tactile perception were defined by the filament manufacturer as follows: normal ; diminished light touch; diminished protective sensation; loss of protective sensation; deep pressure sensation only . All tests were performed by an independent assessor who was unaware of the allocation of randomization. All the procedures followed the operation manual provided by the filament manufacturer. Measuring sites include: LHT(Left hand's middle fingertip);LHP(Left hand's palm);RHT(Right hand's middle fingertip);RHP(Right hand's palm);LFT(Left foot's big toe tip);LFP(Left foot's plantar);RFT(Right foot's big toe tip);RFP(Right foot's plantar)

    Time frame: 2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Explore the Neuroprotective Mechanism of Acupuncture

    15 cc of blood samples will be drawn before and after 15 sessions of treatments from participants in both groups. The blood samples will be analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for tumor necrosis factor-alfa and interleukin- 6, interleukin-10 and brain-derived nuerotrophic factor to evaluate the differences in the inflammation state of peripheral nervous system within and between groups.

    Time frame: 2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment

07

Results

Posted Jan 20, 2025

Participant flow

269 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were screened from June 2018 to July 2020. Of 61 potentially eligible patients, 20 (32.8%) were enrolled and randomized as 10 in the acupuncture group and 10 in the sham acupuncture group. 208 ineligible patients were excluded, and 41 patients declined to participate in our study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneThe Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled Group
Started1010
Completed810
Not completed20
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Average Pain Severity in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF)

The average pain severity was chosen as the primary assessment as neuropathy symptoms based on its ability to detect neuropathic pain in cancer patients, as well as its use to assess CIPN symptoms in other controlled clinical trials.The BPI-SF assesses pain when responding to the questionnaire (right now) and at its worst, least, and average pain severity in the last 24 h. The items range from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain). The higher the pain severity scores, the worse the degree of pain experienced by the patient. We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis: compared the data at week 6 with baseline, and the data at week 9 with baseline from each group. (2) between group analysis: compared the acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group at week 6 and week 9. (3) the between group differences of the changes from week 6 to baseline and from week 9 to baseline.

Time frame:
We measured the average pain severity 4 times within 9 weeks [at baseline (before the first treatment) and week 3, week 6, and week 9 during the protocol].
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Average Pain Severity in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF)
score on a scaleThe Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled Group
Baseline3.10 ± 2.333.10 ± 1.79
Week 31.72 ± 1.483.50 ± 2.27
Week 61.63 ± 0.922.78 ± 2.82
Week 90.88 ± 1.132.70 ± 2.00
Changes at week 6-1.63 ± 1.85-0.11 ± 2.71
Changes at week 9-2.38 ± 2.39-0.40 ± 2.07
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecologic Oncology Group- Neurotoxicity(FACT/GOG-NTX)-13

The 27-item FACT-G evaluated the quality of life of patients undergoing cancer therapy over the past 7 days. The question is rated on a five-point scale, from 0 to 4 (0= not at all; 4= very much) and summed ( total score range= 0-108). An increase in scores represents an improvement in the overall quality of life.The 13-item Ntx subscale measures the severity and impact of neurotoxicity symptoms over the past seven days. Items are rated on a five-point scale, scored from 0 to 4 and summed ( total score range= 0-52). Higher scores on the neurotoxicity scale indicate improvements in neurotoxic symptoms. The 40-item FACT/GOG-Ntx total score represents the sum of the FACT-G and Ntx subscale (total score range=0-160).The FACT/GOG-Ntx trial outcome index (TOI) contained the scores of the PWB, FWB, and FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale (total score range= 0-104).We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis(2) between group analysis(3) the changes between group analysis

Time frame:
4 times within 9 weeks: at baseline (before the first treatment) and week 3, week 6, and week 9 during the protocol
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecologic Oncology Group- Neurotoxicity(FACT/GOG-NTX)-13
score on a scaleThe Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled Group
NtxS-baseline37.60 ± 6.0833.90 ± 7.87
NtxS-week 337.89 ± 6.0133.62 ± 6.52
NtxS-week 641.00 ± 6.7236.44 ± 8.71
NtxS-week 940.88 ± 7.7235.90 ± 5.92
NtxS-Changes at week 63.63 ± 5.071.56 ± 7.55
NtxS-Changes at wee 93.50 ± 4.902.00 ± 6.96
TOI-baseline76.60 ± 14.7467.80 ± 15.25
TOI-week 377.04 ± 16.0369.57 ± 13.39
TOI-week 681.75 ± 19.0373.44 ± 16.54
TOI-week 980.42 ± 20.5874.60 ± 11.91
TOI-changes at week 66.63 ± 7.413.00 ± 14.34
TOI-changes at week 95.29 ± 6.316.80 ± 12.62
FACT-G score-baseline79.70 ± 16.3569.73 ± 14.19
FACT-G score-week 377.96 ± 20.0273.20 ± 15.95
FACT-G score-week 680.08 ± 19.8073.49 ± 16.16
FACT-G score-week 977.54 ± 21.5577.73 ± 11.10
FACT-G score-changes at week 61.06 ± 2.891.66 ± 12.94
FACT-G score-changes at week 9-1.48 ± 5.518 ± 10.31
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-baseline117.30 ± 20.56103.63 ± 19.75
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-week 3115.85 ± 23.80106.82 ± 18.34
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-week 6121.08 ± 25.93109.93 ± 20.79
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-week 9118.42 ± 28.55113.43 ± 12.80
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-changes at week 64.69 ± 7.393.21 ± 18.40
FACT/GOG-Ntx total score-changes at week 92.02 ± 8.019.80 ± 14.30
SecondaryWorld Health Organization Quality of Life Scale(WHOQOL)-BREF (Taiwan Version)

WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version was validated to be a good clinical tool across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors. There are a total 28 items by adding 2 additional items to account for Taiwanese cultural adaptations. Item scores range from 1 to 5 (1 =the worst condition; 5=the best condition), except for 3 items (Ph1, Ph2, and Ps6), which are reverse coded. Each domain in the scale can be translated into two ranges of domain scores (0-100 and 4-20), and we used 0-100 scale in this study. The Higher scores in each domain indicate the better quality of life for patients with cancers We analyzed the data (1) within group analysis: compared post-treatment with baseline. (2) between group analysis: compared the acupuncture group and sham acupuncture group at week 9. (3) the between group differences of the changes from post-treatment to baseline.

Time frame:
We measured 2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale(WHOQOL)-BREF (Taiwan Version)
score on a scaleThe Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled Group
Physical health-baseline60.80 ± 15.9755.20 ± 12.69
Physical health-post-Tx60.88 ± 17.8859.50 ± 11.34
Physical health-Changes at post-Tx3.63 ± 13.524.30 ± 13.36
Psychological-baseline51.40 ± 13.7945.20 ± 16.58
Psychological-post-Tx55.50 ± 18.6252.50 ± 13.52
Psychological-changes at post-Tx6.13 ± 11.797.30 ± 8.14
Social relationships-baseline62.10 ± 9.5654.50 ± 10.22
Social relationships-post Tx68.00 ± 11.1558.90 ± 10.80
Social relationships-changes at post-Tx6.88 ± 9.694.40 ± 11.90
Environment-baseline61.90 ± 8.2061.40 ± 13.02
Environment-post Tx61.75 ± 10.3366.30 ± 11.84
Environment-changes at post-Tx-1.63 ± 11.604.90 ± 10.97
SecondaryTouch Test Sensory Evaluator

Measurements were performed using a set of 20 von Frey monofilaments(Semmes-Weinstein Von Frey Aesthesiometer, Stoelting Co. 620 Wheat Lane, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.), with evaluator size/target forces from 1.65/0.008 gto 6.65/300 g. Each monofilament was calibrated to a target force in grams (g) within a 5% standard deviation. Thresholds for categories of tactile perception were defined by the filament manufacturer as follows: normal ; diminished light touch; diminished protective sensation; loss of protective sensation; deep pressure sensation only . All tests were performed by an independent assessor who was unaware of the allocation of randomization. All the procedures followed the operation manual provided by the filament manufacturer. Measuring sites include: LHT(Left hand's middle fingertip);LHP(Left hand's palm);RHT(Right hand's middle fingertip);RHP(Right hand's palm);LFT(Left foot's big toe tip);LFP(Left foot's plantar);RFT(Right foot's big toe tip);RFP(Right foot's plantar)

Time frame:
2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · grams
Touch Test Sensory Evaluator
gramsThe Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled Group
LHT-baseline1.64 ± 1.871.62 ± 1.41
LHT-post-Tx0.41 ± 0.661.82 ± 2.28
LHT-changes at post-Tx-1.54 ± 2.120.20 ± 2.51
LHP-baseline2.60 ± 4.691.98 ± 2.89
LHP-post-Tx0.25 ± 0.231.44 ± 1.99
LHP-changes at post-Tx-2.92 ± 5.20-0.54 ± 1.73
RHT-baseline1.52 ± 1.351.74 ± 1.31
RHT-post-Tx0.37 ± 0.291.25 ± 1.78
RHT-changes at post-Tx-1.43 ± 1.37-0.50 ± 2.20
RHP-baseline2.50 ± 4.531.91 ± 1.85
RHP-post-Tx0.28 ± 0.201.27 ± 1.77
RHP-changes at post-Tx-2.75 ± 5.06-0.64 ± 1.13
LFT-baseline14.02 ± 30.5710.30 ± 17.99
LFT-post-Tx2.50 ± 2.493.50 ± 3.41
LFT-changes at post-Tx-14.87 ± 34.46-6.80 ± 16.04
LFP-baseline20.66 ± 56.179.61 ± 18.09
LFP-post-Tx2.35 ± 5.133.24 ± 4.60
LFP-changes at post-Tx-23.40 ± 57.43-6.36 ± 13.99
RFT-baseline12.80 ± 17.305.28 ± 7.55
RFT-post-Tx2.43 ± 2.944.94 ± 4.71
RFT-changes at post-Tx-12.45 ± 19.99-0.34 ± 7.15
RFP-baseline6.46 ± 6.539.36 ± 18.01
RFP-post-Tx2.87 ± 5.063.94 ± 3.77
RFP-changes at post-Tx-4.93 ± 6.11-5.41 ± 15.95
Other pre-specifiedExplore the Neuroprotective Mechanism of Acupuncture

15 cc of blood samples will be drawn before and after 15 sessions of treatments from participants in both groups. The blood samples will be analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for tumor necrosis factor-alfa and interleukin- 6, interleukin-10 and brain-derived nuerotrophic factor to evaluate the differences in the inflammation state of peripheral nervous system within and between groups.

Time frame:
2 times within 9 weeks: before and after treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over A total of nine weeks from the start of the study to the end of the study. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
The Acupuncture Group0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
The Controlled Group0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)The Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled GroupTotal
Mean47.10 ± 11.0752.10 ± 11.1849.60 ± 11.13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)The Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled GroupTotal
Female101020
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)The Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)The Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled GroupTotal
Taiwan101020
Eastern Cooperative Group(ECOG) performance status
Eastern Cooperative Group(ECOG) performance status(Participants)The Acupuncture GroupThe Controlled GroupTotal
Grade 010919
Grade 1011
08

Study locations

1 site
  • An Nan Hospital, China Medical University
    Tainan, 709, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Franconi G, Manni L, Schroder S, Marchetti P, Robinson N. A systematic review of experimental and clinical acupuncture in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:516916. doi: 10.1155/2013/516916. Epub 2013 Jul 24. PubMed 23983788 ↗
  • Park SB, Goldstein D, Krishnan AV, Lin CS, Friedlander ML, Cassidy J, Koltzenburg M, Kiernan MC. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a critical analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Nov-Dec;63(6):419-37. doi: 10.3322/caac.21204. PubMed 24590861 ↗
  • Greenlee H, Crew KD, Capodice J, Awad D, Buono D, Shi Z, Jeffres A, Wyse S, Whitman W, Trivedi MS, Kalinsky K, Hershman DL. Randomized sham-controlled pilot trial of weekly electro-acupuncture for the prevention of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(3):453-464. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3759-2. Epub 2016 Mar 25. PubMed 27013473 ↗
  • Wong R, Major P, Sagar S. Phase 2 Study of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Jun;15(2):153-64. doi: 10.1177/1534735415627926. Epub 2016 Apr 29. PubMed 27130723 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 1, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03626220
Lead sponsor
China Medical University Hospital
Responsible party
Chien-Chen Huang (Attending physician, China Medical University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2018
Start date
Jun 27, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2020
Completion
Oct 10, 2020
Results posted
Jan 20, 2025
Last update
Jan 20, 2025

Study contacts

Chien-Chen Huang, M.S.
principal investigator · An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion