ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03615690Updated Feb 27, 2026

The Influence of a Fasting Mimicking Diet on Ulcerative Colitis

An interventional study of Fasting Mimicking Diet and Regular Diet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Diet Modification and Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by Stanford University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Primary conditionColitis, UlcerativeRegistry: Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Colitis, Ulcerative
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Colitis, Ulcerative, a narrower term within Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to see how a diet that mimics fasting effects inflammation in patients with mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The diet may allow users to receive the benefits of fasting while also being able to enjoy food (the ingredients of which are GRAS (generally recognized as safe) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Research on dietary interventions and UC are very limited. Fasting mimicking diets (FMD) have been studied with support of the National Institute of Health and published in leading journals. This research investigates whether markers of inflammation decrease and/or quality of life increases after three cycles of a five-day period of the fasting mimicking diet, and may provide rationale for its use to treat UC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Diet Modification
  • Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

  • ulcerative colitis
  • IBD
  • diet
  • fasting
  • fasting mimicking diet
  • UC
  • intermittent fasting
03

In context

Colitis, Ulcerative Reclassified

1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 70 across 1,236 interventional studies indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative.

Browse Colitis, Ulcerative studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Compared within Colitis, Ulcerative, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis on the partial Mayo Score out of 9 (score between 2 to 7)
  • Age of 18-70 at start of study (inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or nursing or expect to be pregnant
  • Individuals allergic to nuts
  • Individuals with a (BMI) lower than 18
  • Individuals diagnosed with a serious medical condition as defined by the patient's physician, unless approved in writing by a physician
  • Individuals who have been severely weakened by a disease or medical procedure,
  • Individuals who are taking medication which may not be safely consumed with a calorie restricted diet
  • Individuals with diabetes who are taking anti-diabetic drugs associated with risk of hypoglycemia
  • Individuals with more than mild-moderate cardiovascular disease or life-threatening cancer (as determined by patient's physician) unless approved by a physician
  • Individuals with history of severe cardiac disease (particularly uncompensated congestive heart failure grade 2 or more or \< 40%)
  • Individuals with a history of syncope
  • Individuals with dietary needs incompatible with the FMD meal plan
  • Individuals with liver or kidney disorders that may be affected by very low glucose and protein content of the diet.
  • Patients on a caloric restricted diet will also be excluded.
  • Patients with relevant prior gastrointestinal surgery and consequences such as short bowel syndrome, ostomy of small or large intestine, hemi- or total colectomy, proctocolectomy, ileoanal pouch will be excluded.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fasting Mimicking Diet

    Three cycles of a 5-day reduced calorie diet

    Other: Fasting Mimicking Diet

  • Placebo comparator
    Regular Diet Control Arm

    Other: Regular Diet

Interventions

  • OtherFasting Mimicking Diet

    5 day reduced calorie diet

  • OtherRegular Diet

    Regular Diet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical response as per partial Mayo score

    Defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score of \>= 2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of \<=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 point, or achieving a partial Mayo score \<2. The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score

    Defined as a partial Mayo score \< 2 points. The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  2. Clinical remission as per modified Mayo (mMayo) score

    Defined as mMayo score \<= 1 point, with rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscore of 0, and endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1. The mMayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy, omitting PGA.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  3. Clinical response as per mMayo score

    Defined as a decrease of the mMayo score of \>=2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of \<=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 point.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  4. Patient global assessment

    "Do you believe you are in remission from your UC symptoms?" (Yes/No). No scale.

    Time frame: Assessed within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  5. Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

    Change in the inflammatory marker CRP (if elevated at baseline).

    Time frame: Comparison of CRP levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  6. Change in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

    Change of the inflammatory marker ESR (if elevated at baseline).

    Time frame: Comparison of ESR levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  7. Change in Fecal Calprotectin.

    Change of the inflammatory marker fecal calprotectin (if elevated at baseline).

    Time frame: Comparison of calprotectin levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  8. Effect of FMD on endoscopic outcomes

    Changes in modified Mayo (mMayo) endoscopic subscore. The subscore ranges from 0 to 3 points with higher scores reflecting more severe disease.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  9. Symptomatic remission as per Patient Reported Outcome (PRO2) score

    Defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0.

    Time frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  10. Change in Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire (SIBDQ) score

    Quality of life score in UC patients. Response to each of the questions is graded from 1 to 7 (1 being the worst situation and 7 the best).

    Time frame: Comparison of SIBDQ score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

Other outcomes

  1. Assessment of primary and key secondary endpoints at baseline versus 3 months after the start of Cycle 3.

    Outcomes 1 to 11 at additional time points.

    Time frame: Comparison of endpoints up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and 3 months after the start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  2. Changes in cytokines/chemokines and immune cell profiles using flow cytometry and mass cytometry (CyTOF).

    Cytokines/chemokines (e.g. TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma, α4β7, CCR1, and CCR9) and immune cell profiles.

    Time frame: Comparison of cytokines/chemokines/immune cell profiles up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  3. Differences in clinical markers of disease activity at baseline versus within 6 days after completing Cycle 1.

    Clinical markers of disease activity are CRP, ESR and fecal Calprotectin (if elevated at baseline).

    Time frame: Comparison of clinical markers up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 1. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

  4. Changes in gut metabolites (including short-chain fatty acid and bile acid profiles) and microbiome profiles (using 16S rRNA/shotgun metagenomics).

    Gut metabolites include short-chain fatty acid and bile acid profiles.

    Time frame: Comparison of characteristics up to 14 days before Cycle 1, within 6 days after completing Cycle 3, and 3 months after start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 84 months after the start.

Of 225 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colitis, Ulcerative, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 84 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 236 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 3, 2018
First posted
Aug 6, 2018
StartActual
Dec 15, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Feb 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03615690
Responsible party
Sidhartha Ranjit Sinha (Assistant Professor of Medicine, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 6, 2018
Start date
Dec 15, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Touran Fardeen
Contact
tfardeen@stanford.edu
6507367311
Sidhartha R Sinha, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion