CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03612011OCRPUpdated Sep 6, 2019

Efficacy of the Cosmetic Product "Onco-Repair" on Grade 2 Hand Foot Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of Onco-Repair/ Placebo in Grade 2 Hand-foot Syndrom, sponsored by Quanta Medical. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-06.

Sponsored by Quanta Medical · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to assess the restorative efficacy of the cosmetic product "Onco-Repair" vs placebo of the most affected palmer face in subject with grade 2 HFS induced by targeted therapies or conventional chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

HFS, also known as Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysethesia, is a common adverse event observed in subjects under anti-tumor therapy with conventional chemotherapy or targeted thérapies. The initial symptoms are dysesthesia and tingling in the palms, fingers and soles of feet and erythema, which may progress to burning pain with dryness, cracking, desquamation, ulceration and oedema. Sensory impairment, paresthesia and pruritus have also been reported. Palms of the hands are more frequently affected than soles of the feet, and might even be the only area affected in some subjects.

Although HFS is rarely life-threatening, the skin changes are often painful and debilitating and can impair with the general activities of daily living and quality of life. No standard prevention for HFS has not been established yet.

Onco-Repair is a nourishing and repairing cream specially formulated to treat grade 2 HFS which demonstrate skin tolerance, hypoallergenicity and efficacy through several preclinical and clinical studies on healthy subjects.

Therefore, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will be conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of topical cream 'Onco-Repair' on HFS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Grade 2 Hand-foot Syndrom

Keywords

  • Hand Foot Syndrome Grade 2
  • Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
  • Oncology
  • Repair Cream
  • Cutaneous events
  • Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome
  • Targeted Therapies or Conventional Chemotherapy
03

In context

Hand-Foot Syndrome

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Hand-Foot Syndrome; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Hand-Foot Syndrome.

Browse Hand-Foot Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Quanta Medical is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Who suffers from grade 2 HFS
  • Subject under anti-tumor treatment known to cause this toxicity: targeted therapies or conventional chemotherapy: 5-Fluorouracile, Aflibercept, Axitinib, Bévacizumab, Capécitabine, Cediranib, Cytarabine, Dabrafenib, Docétaxel, Doxorubicine, Epirubicine, Pazopanib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Trastuzumab, Regorafenib, Vemurafenib and any other anti-tumor treatment that may lead to this toxicity
  • Subject 18 years old and more
  • Subject having been informed, having signed a free, informed and written consent
  • Woman of childbearing age using contraception deemed effective

Non-Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Subject having a history of allergic contact dermatitis or irritation to any of the components of the investigational products
  • Subjects with another skin pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of a HFS (at the investigator's discretion)
  • Subject under anti-inflammatory treatment
  • Subject participating in another clinical study during the duration of the study, except in a study assessing one of the molecules listed in the section above
  • Subject who has already been treated for Grade 2 HFS or under other local treatment or cosmetic product
  • Subject refusing to interrupt the application of his/her usual care
  • Subject having a strongly altered general condition and / or non-autonomous subject (Karnofsky index \<50%)
  • Subject in linguistic or psychic impossibility to understand and sign informed consent or in the impossibility of submitting to the medical follow-up of the study
  • Subject deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision, or under guardianship
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Onco-Repair

    Onco-Repair tube of 150 ml

    Other: Onco-Repair/ Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo tube of 150 ml

    Other: Onco-Repair/ Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherOnco-Repair/ Placebo

    Cream must be applied twice a day, in the morning and evening, on the hands and feet (palmo-plantar areas and interdigital spaces included) previously cleaned with Atoderm Intensive Foaming Gel, chosen as a standardized hygiene product.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall success

    A subject is considered to have attained success if he achieves at least one grade improvement in HFS for the most affected palmer face according to the National Cancer Institute CTCATE V5.0 at any time during study period (28 days). The subjects will be defined in success or failure according to the following rules: Success: switch from grade 2 to grade 1 or grade 0 Failure: switch from grade 2 to grade 3 If subjects remain at grade 2 at the end of the study, they will be classified as either success or failure according to the evolution of clinical signs and / or quality of life assessed using the Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) scale from D0 to D28.

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to onset of grade 1 or 0 will be assessed using time (in days) from study commencement (inclusion, D0) to first occurrence of grade 1 or lower HFS according to the CTCAEV5.0

    Time to onset of grade 1 or 0 will be assessed using time (in days) from study

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. Clinical parameters such as lesion color

    Clinical parameters such as lesion color will be assessed * On e-CRF at D0, D7 and D28 * from D0 to D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  3. Clinical parameters such as presence of blisters

    Clinical parameters such as presence of blisters will be assessed * On e-CRF at D0, D7 and D28 * from D0 to D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  4. Clinical parameters such as fissures/cracks

    Clinical parameters such as fissures/cracks will be assessed * On e-CRF at D0, D7 and D28 * from D0 to D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  5. Assessment of quality of life from D0 to D28 using Dermatology Life Quality Index scale

    Quality of life will be assessed from D0 to D28 using Dermatology Life Quality Index scale. It is a simple 10-question validated questionnaire that has been used in over 40 different skin conditions in over 80 countries and is available in over 90 languages. Meaning of Dermatology Life Quality Index scale Scores: 0 to 1 = no effect at all on patient's life 2 to 5 = small effect on patient's life 6 to 10 = moderate effect on patient's life 11 to 20 = very large effect on patient's life 21 to 30 = extremely large effect on patient's life

    Time frame: 28 days

  6. Assessment of symptoms

    Such as intensity of lesions, feeling of subjects, etc will be assessed: on e-CRF at D0, D7 and D28, from D0 to D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  7. Assessment of pain score and prurit at D0, D7 and D28 using a 100 Visual Analogue Scale [Visual analogue scale, 0 (no pain, no prurit) and 100 (worst possible pain or prurit)]

    Pain score and prurit will be assessed at D0, D7 and D28 using a 100 Visual Analogue Scale \[Visual analogue scale , 0 (no pain, no prurit) and 100 (worst possible pain or prurit)\]

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  8. Assessment of the repair quality of skin

    The repair quality of skin will be assessed from D0, D7 and D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects.

    Time frame: Day 0 (inclusion) , Day 7 and Day 28

  9. Cosmetic parameters such as nourishing power of the cream will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary

    Nourishing power will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects.

    Time frame: 28 days

  10. Cosmetic parameters such as soothing power of the cream will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary

    Soothing power will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects.

    Time frame: 28 days

  11. Cosmetic parameters such as penetration power of the cream will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary

    Penetration power will be assessed at D28 using a standardized diary completed by subjects.

    Time frame: 28 days

  12. Assessment of compliance

    The compliance will be assessed at the end of the study: subject will be considered to be compliant if he/she applied at least the theoretical consumption of 60% of the product.

    Time frame: 28 days

  13. The overall tolerance will be assessed by the investigator (Subject interrogation). This evaluation will be carried out during visits using the following rating: 1 = Very good tolerance 2 = Good tolerance 3 = Middle tolerance 4 = Poor tolerance

    1. = Very good tolerance: no functional signs of discomfort and no objective signs during examination 2. = Good tolerance: some functional signs of minimal and transient discomfort that did not interrupt the applications and no objective signs during examination 3. = Middle tolerance: functional signs of discomfort, net or persistent, or objective signs during examination that did not interrupt the applications of the investigationalproduct 4. = Poor tolerance: functional and / or objectives signs leading to discontinuation of the use of the investigational product

    Time frame: 28 days

  14. Safety will be will be evaluated in terms of: - the number of subjects presenting during the study period at least : One AE/ One SAE - the total number of AEs during the study period - the total number of SAEs during the study period

    Safety will be assessed on the basis of adverse event (AE) reports

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Quanta Medical
    Rueil-Malmaison, 92500, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lipworth AD, Robert C, Zhu AX. Hand-foot syndrome (hand-foot skin reaction, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia): focus on sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncology. 2009;77(5):257-71. doi: 10.1159/000258880. Epub 2009 Nov 16. PubMed 19923864 ↗
  • Zhang RX, Wu XJ, Lu SX, Pan ZZ, Wan DS, Chen G. The effect of COX-2 inhibitor on capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer: a phase II randomized prospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;137(6):953-7. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0958-9. Epub 2010 Nov 27. PubMed 21113620 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03612011
Lead sponsor
Quanta Medical
Collaborators
NAOS Institute of Life Science
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2018
Start date
Jul 12, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2018
Completion
Jun 2, 2019
Last update
Sep 6, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion