CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03611504Updated Feb 21, 2019

Hemospray in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Real-life Multicenter Cohort

An observational study in Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Ulcer Hemorrhage and Tumor Bleeding, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-21.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
261
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational, retrospective, analytical, and multicenter study conducted at 17 hospitals. Our research aims to assess the effectiveness of Hemospray® in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in clinical practice. Besides, we aim to detect predictors of treatment failure defined as unsuccessful immediate hemostasis or rebleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • Ulcer Hemorrhage
  • Tumor Bleeding

Keywords

  • Hemospray, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Hemostatic powder
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 261 is above the median of 200 across 116 observational studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Browse Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding treated with Hemospray®.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding treated with Hemospray®.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
261 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Hemospray® group

    Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding treated with Hemospray®.

    Device: Hemospray®

Interventions

  • DeviceHemospray®

    Hemospray® application

    Also known as: Hemostatic powder

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemospray® intraprocedural bleeding control

    It refers to the proportion (%) of patients who achieves intraprocedural hemostasis with Hemospray®. Intraprocedural bleeding control is defined as endoscopic observation of bleeding cessation after Hemospray® use.

    Time frame: From Hemospray® first application up to the end of the endoscopic procedure. This variable should be assessed in day 1.

  2. Rebleeding rate

    To describe the rebleeding rate (%) after Hemospray®. Rebleeding is defined as a new episode of hematemesis, rectorrhagia or melena; hemoglobin level decrease \>2 g/dL within 48 h of the index endoscopy or direct visualization of active bleeding at the previously treated lesion at repeat endoscopy.

    Time frame: Date of Hemospray® application until rebleeding, assessed up to 48 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events potentially related to Hemospray®

    Abdominal distension (Yes/no), Intestinal perforation (Yes/No). Unexpected adverse events will be also recorded and evaluated.

    Time frame: From Hemospray application until day +7

  2. Mortality

    % of patients who die after Hemospray® application

    Time frame: From Hemospray application until death, assessed up to 48 months or lost follow-up, whichever came first

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study database will be available for other researches. The study protocol is already available at AEG-RedCap platform. STROBE guidelines will be followed.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03611504
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Collaborators
University of Salamanca, Hospital del Mar, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Hospital de Henares, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Quirón Madrid University Hospital, Hospital de Cruces, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Hospital del Rio Hortega, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Hospital de Aviles, Hospital IMQ Zorrozaurre
Responsible party
Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago (M.D Gastroenterologist, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 2, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2018
Completion
Dec 30, 2018
Last update
Feb 21, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion