CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03599648Updated Mar 11, 2025Results posted

The Pro-Parenting Study: Helping Parents Reduce Behavior Problems in Preschool Children With Developmental Delay

An interventional study of BPT-M and BPT-E in Development Delay and Behavior Problem, sponsored by University of Oregon. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-11.

Sponsored by University of Oregon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
959
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Pro-Parenting Study seeks to determine the added benefit of targeting both parenting stress and parent management strategies to more effectively reduce behavior problems among children with developmental delay (DD). Findings from this study will improve the scientific understanding of evidence-based interventions for behavior problems among children with DD and the mechanisms underlying therapeutic change.

Read the detailed description

Behavior problems are a common and concerning challenge among children with developmental delay (DD). Approximately 50% of children with DD have a comorbid mental disorder or serious behavior problems- a prevalence three times as high as that found in typically developing youths. Behavioral parent training (BPT) is the gold-standard intervention for treating child behavior problems in typically developing children and in children with DD. However, high levels of parental stress are associated with reduced or no response to BPT for children with DD. Consequently, parental stress may attenuate the efficacy of the gold-standard, empirically supported treatment for behavior problems among children with DD. As such, parental stress is a critical point of intervention for improving both parent and child outcomes in families of children with DD. The purpose of this study is to quantify the therapeutic benefit of adding a parent stress-reduction intervention prior to delivering BPT in order to more effectively reduce child behavior problems, and to investigate the mechanisms through which intervention outcomes occur.

02

Conditions studied

  • Development Delay
  • Behavior Problem

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intervention
  • behavioral parent training
  • mindfulness-based stress reduction
03

In context

Problem Behavior

517 studies on the registry are indexed under Problem Behavior; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 959 is above the median of 90 across 391 interventional studies indexed under Problem Behavior.

Browse Problem Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oregon is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent has a child ages 3 to 5 years with an agency-identified DD in one or more functional areas who is receiving early intervention or early childhood/ preschool special education through an individualized family service plan (IFSP) or individualized education plan (IEP);
  • Parent reports elevated child behavior problems, as indicated by a T-score of 60 or above on the Total Problems scale of the Child Behavior Checklist;
  • Parent reports elevated parenting stress, as indexed by a total score above the recommended cutoff at the 85th percentile on the Parenting Stress Index-4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent screens positive for active psychosis, substance abuse, or suicidality;
  • Parent is currently receiving any form of psychological or behavioral treatment at the time of referral; or
  • The child has sensory impairments or nonambulatory conditions that would necessitate the need for significant modifications to the lab and home visit protocols.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
959 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BPT-E

    Behavioral parent training (BPT) plus a psychoeducation program. Includes a 10-week standard BPT, plus a 6-week psychoeducation program delivered prior to the standard BPT.

    Behavioral: BPT-E

  • Experimental
    BPT-M

    Behavioral parent training (BPT) plus mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Includes a 10-week standard BPT, plus a 6-week MBSR delivered prior to the standard BPT.

    Behavioral: BPT-M

  • No intervention
    Teachers

    At each wave of data collection, caregivers in both conditions were asked to identify a teacher who could provide an evaluation of their child's behavior outside the home. Participating teachers completed a brief 2-page questionnaire about the child.

Interventions

  • BehavioralBPT-M

    Participants randomized to the BPT-M condition receive the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention, followed by Behavioral Parent Training (BPT). The MBSR module includes six weekly 2.5 hour group sessions, 30-45 minutes of daily home practice guided by audio CDs, and an MBSR parent workbook. In the sessions, participants practice formal mindfulness exercises, and are provided instruction on stress physiology and using mindfulness for coping with stress in everyday life. The BPT component of the intervention includes 10 weekly sessions lasting 2.5 hours. Each session is structured around videotape vignettes and uses discussion, role-playing, modeling, and feedback to foster mastery of the material. Parents are given weekly homework assignments and practice their skills.

  • BehavioralBPT-E

    Participants randomized to the BPT-E condition will received 6 weeks of a psychoeducation program followed by 10 weeks of the Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) used in both conditions. The psychoeducation module consists of 6 weekly 2.5-hour sessions, daily homework that includes monitoring progress on goals identified at the end of each session, and a workbook for parents of children with special needs that provides parents with information regarding their child's development, disability, and associated considerations. Each of the 6 weekly sessions includes a general topic for discussion. These include preparing for IEP meetings, navigating the regional center and developmental service agencies, communicating with teachers, advocacy, sibling issues, and community resources.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Problems (Parent Report)

    Parents report on child behavior using the Child Behavior Checklist-Ages 1.5-5 years (Achenbach, 2000), a 99-item questionnaire that assesses behavioral problems in young children. Parents were asked to rate how accurately each item described their child's behavior over the past 2 months using a 3-pt scale (0=not true/ 1= somewhat or sometimes true/ 2= very true or often true). A Total Behavior Problems score was derived by taking the sum of all 99 items, with a possible range of 0-198. A high score indicates greater problem behavior.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Parenting Behavior (Parent Report)

    Parents report on their parenting behavior using the Parenting Practices Interview (The Incredible Years, 2015), a 73-item questionnaire with 7 summary scales. Parents were asked how often they engaged in various parenting practices when their child misbehaved, or their likelihood of responding with a certain parenting behavior in provided scenarios of negative child behavior. The Appropriate Discipline summary scale (12 items) was used in the present study. Scores ranged from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate greater use of appropriate disciplinary practices.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Change From Baseline in Parenting Stress (Parent Self-Report)

    Parents report on their parenting stress using the Parenting Stress Index-Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI4-SF; Abidin, 1995). Parents were asked to indicate their agreement with 36 statements about their feelings on a 5 pt scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree, strongly disagree). A Total Stress Score was derived from responses to these items, and scores could range from 36-180. High scores indicate greater parenting stress.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 3, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBPT-EBPT-MTeachers
Started261260438
Received intervention as assigned1071140
Completed follow-up immediately after intervention1861920
Completed 6-month follow-up1831870
Completed 12-month follow-up1942010
Completed215219438
Not completed46410

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Child Behavior Problems (Parent Report)

Parents report on child behavior using the Child Behavior Checklist-Ages 1.5-5 years (Achenbach, 2000), a 99-item questionnaire that assesses behavioral problems in young children. Parents were asked to rate how accurately each item described their child's behavior over the past 2 months using a 3-pt scale (0=not true/ 1= somewhat or sometimes true/ 2= very true or often true). A Total Behavior Problems score was derived by taking the sum of all 99 items, with a possible range of 0-198. A high score indicates greater problem behavior.

Time frame:
baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Problems (Parent Report)
score on a scaleBPT-EBPT-M
Baseline73.60 ± 27.7777.95 ± 26.99
Immediately after 16-week intervention71.49 ± 29.5171.69 ± 30.40
6-month follow-up67.85 ± 29.5170.67 ± 33.17
12-month follow-up66.48 ± 29.4368.25 ± 31.39
Statistical analysis
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .361 (baseline versus immediately after 16-week BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .126 (baseline versus 6 months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (baseline versus 12 months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (baseline versus immediately after 16 week BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (baseline versus 6 months after BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (baseline versus 12 months after BPT-M intervention)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parenting Behavior (Parent Report)

Parents report on their parenting behavior using the Parenting Practices Interview (The Incredible Years, 2015), a 73-item questionnaire with 7 summary scales. Parents were asked how often they engaged in various parenting practices when their child misbehaved, or their likelihood of responding with a certain parenting behavior in provided scenarios of negative child behavior. The Appropriate Discipline summary scale (12 items) was used in the present study. Scores ranged from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate greater use of appropriate disciplinary practices.

Time frame:
baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parenting Behavior (Parent Report)
score on a scaleBPT-EBPT-M
Baseline3.85 ± 1.213.90 ± 1.03
Immediately after 16-week intervention4.02 ± 0.924.12 ± 1.02
6-month follow-up4.10 ± 1.044.13 ± 1.06
12-month follow-up4.15 ± 0.944.10 ± 0.99
Statistical analysis
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .035 (Baseline versus immediately following 16-week BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .001 (Baseline versus 6-months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 12 months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus immediately after 16-week BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 6 months after BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 12 months after BPT-M intervention)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parenting Stress (Parent Self-Report)

Parents report on their parenting stress using the Parenting Stress Index-Fourth Edition, Short Form (PSI4-SF; Abidin, 1995). Parents were asked to indicate their agreement with 36 statements about their feelings on a 5 pt scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree, strongly disagree). A Total Stress Score was derived from responses to these items, and scores could range from 36-180. High scores indicate greater parenting stress.

Time frame:
baseline, immediately after 16-week intervention, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parenting Stress (Parent Self-Report)
score on a scaleBPT-EBPT-M
Baseline113.70 ± 20.01115.28 ± 20.86
Immediately After 16-week Intervention101.23 ± 21.73100.10 ± 20.80
6-month Follow-up97.72 ± 25.0896.89 ± 22.33
12-month Follow-up96.21 ± 20.7394.93 ± 26.40
Statistical analysis
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus immediately after 16-week BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 6 months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-E · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 12 months after BPT-E intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus immediately after 16-week BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (Baseline versus 6 months after BPT-M intervention)
  • BPT-M · t-test, 2 sided · p = .000 (baseline versus 12 months after BPT-M intervention)

Adverse events

Collected over Caregivers and children were monitored for adverse events over the study period (e.g., up to 24 months from baseline).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BPT-E0/261 (0%)0/261 (0%)0/261 (0%)
BPT-M0/260 (0%)0/260 (0%)0/260 (0%)
Teachers———

Baseline characteristics

At baseline,131 caregivers in each condition provided data for themselves and their children, and 128 children in each condition participated in observation/ play tasks. Three additional children engaged in play tasks at later waves and are included here as having "started" the study. The current teacher of each child was recruited at each wave, resulting in a total of 438 teachers providing data about students at some point during the study. 170 teachers completed surveys at baseline.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
Caregivers37.31 ± 7.6537.32 ± 7.64—37.31 ± 7.63
Children4.28 ± 0.854.32 ± .88—4.30 ± .86
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
18-25 years——2929
26-35 years——8989
36-45 years——6565
46-55 years——5858
56-65 years——2929
66 years and older——22
prefer not to answer——22
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
Caregivers — Female128124—252
Caregivers — Male37—10
Children — Female5140—91
Children — Male7989—168
Teachers — Female——258258
Teachers — Male——1616
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
Caregivers — Hispanic or Latino8072—152
Caregivers — Not Hispanic or Latino4557—102
Caregivers — Unknown or Not Reported62—8
Children — Hispanic or Latino8783—170
Children — Not Hispanic or Latino3844—82
Children — Unknown or Not Reported52—7
Teachers — Hispanic or Latino——9696
Teachers — Not Hispanic or Latino——178178
Teachers — Unknown or Not Reported——00
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
Caregivers — American Indian or Alaska Native00—0
Caregivers — Asian52—7
Caregivers — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00—0
Caregivers — Black or African American89—17
Caregivers — White2534—59
Caregivers — More than one race712—19
Caregivers — Unknown or Not Reported8674—160
Children — American Indian or Alaska Native11—2
Children — Asian32—5
Children — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00—0
Children — Black or African American712—19
Children — White3241—73
Children — More than one race104—14
Children — Unknown or Not Reported7769—146
Teachers — American Indian or Alaska Native0022
Teachers — Asian002424
Teachers — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Teachers — Black or African American001616
Teachers — White00122122
Teachers — More than one race001515
Teachers — Unknown or Not Reported009595
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BPT-EBPT-MTeachersTotal
United States261260438959
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Loma Linda University
    Loma Linda, California 92350, United States
  • University of Oregon
    Portland, Oregon 97209, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 17, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Nov 12, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03599648
Lead sponsor
University of Oregon
Collaborators
Loma Linda University
Responsible party
Laura Lee McIntyre (Professor & Dean, College of Education, University of Oregon) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 26, 2018
Start date
Sep 14, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2023
Completion
Jul 18, 2023
Results posted
Mar 3, 2025
Last update
Mar 11, 2025

Study contacts

Laura L McIntyre, PhD
principal investigator · University of Oregon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion