CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03587818PINCOREUpdated Jul 16, 2018

Person-Centred Information and Communication for Patients Undergoing Colo-Rectal Surgery - the PINCORE Project

An interventional study of person-centred communication in Colorectal Neoplasms, sponsored by Göteborg University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-16.

Sponsored by Göteborg University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2012, registered Apr 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
488
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An overarching aim is to create prerequisites for person-centred information and communication. The specific aim is to evaluate if an intervention with a written information and communication support tool and person-centred dialogues can increase patients' health-related quality of life and preparedness and well-being pre-surgery and during recovery in connection to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Further, the aim is to explain variations in patients' recovery trajectories during the six months following CRC surgery in order to identify particularly vulnerable sub-groups of patients.

The hypothesis is that person-centred information and communication supported by an interactive patient information and education material (PEM) for patients undergoing CRC surgery will lead to improved preparedness for surgery and recovery during recovery 6 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were decreased length of stay at hospital in relation to surgery, changed behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support, and improved emotional, role and social function, general health status and distress.

The study is performed at three surgical departments in Sweden. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. The project started with analysis of existing patient written information and education materials aimed for the patient group at Swedish surgical departments and analyses of conversations between patients and providers in consultations occurring over time before and following surgery. These results provided the basis for the development of the person-centred communication intervention developed in collaboration between people who had undergone CRC surgery, professionals from CRC surgery clinics and researchers with expertise in patient education, person-centred care and CRC surgery.

The design is quasi-experimental and longitudinal. Patients are consecutively sampled. Types of data:

  • patient reported answers in validated questionnaires
  • information about diagnosis, type of treatments and course of care obtained from patients' records
  • recorded consultation conversations with patients between patients and health care providers
  • narrative interviews with patients 6 months following discharge regarding their recovery after surgery
  • focus group discussions and individual interviews with professionals regarding how they have perceived using the intervention and how it has functioned.
Read the detailed description

Background In Sweden, approximately 3,900 people are diagnosed with colon cancer and 1,900 with rectal cancer annually, split almost equally between women and men. The primary treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) is surgery. A particular challenge in CRC care is meeting patients' information needs over time in order to improve their recovery. There is a need for comprehensive considerations and person-centred communication supporting patients to be prepared for the surgery and the following recovery.

Aim An overarching aim is to create prerequisites for person-centred information and communication. The specific aim is to evaluate if an intervention with a written information and communication support tool and person-centred dialogues can increase patients' health-related quality of life and preparedness and well-being pre-surgery and during recovery in connection to colorectal cancer surgery. The hypothesis is that person-centred information and communication supported by an interactive patient information and education material (PEM) for patients undergoing CRC surgery will lead to improved preparedness for surgery and recovery during recovery 6 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were decreased length of stay at hospital in relation to surgery, changed behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support, and improved emotional, role and social function, general health status and distress. Further, the aim is to explain variations in patients' recovery trajectories during the six months following CRC surgery in order to identify particularly vulnerable sub-groups of patients.

Communication in consultations will be supported by a innovative written interactive PEM with the goal to enhance the patient's knowledge seeking in order to be prepared for "the next step" in his/her care process. Here, person-centred communication refers to the patient-provider conversations where the patient is encouraged to tell about personal experiences, perceptions and worries in a dialogue format. An assumption is that dialogues unfolds when the two partners together are seeking to make sense of what is shared to each others.

Method Three hospitals. The study is performed at three surgical departments; university, regional and local hospitals; including public and private non-profit. Health care providers and patients from the three hospitals will be included in the development and evaluation of the intervention. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied.

Initial analyses before the development of the intervention The project started with analysis of existing patient written information and education materials aimed for the patient group at Swedish surgical departments and analyses of conversations between patients and providers in consultations occurring over time before and following surgery. These results provided the basis for the development of the person-centred communication intervention developed in collaboration between people who had undergone CRC surgery, professionals from CRC surgery clinics and researchers with expertise in patient education, person-centred care and CRC surgery.

Evaluation in a quasi-experimental design

The design of the clinical intervention study is quasi-experimental and longitudinal; one group of patients before the introduction of the intervention will be compared to one group who have been part of the intervention (consecutively sampled). For the evaluation several types of data will be used:

  • patient reported answers in validated questionnaires
  • clinical and treatment data obtained from patients' records
  • recorded consultation conversations with patients between patients and health care providers
  • narrative interviews with patients 6 months following discharge regarding their recovery after surgery
  • focus group discussions and individual interviews with professionals regarding how they have perceived using the intervention and how it has functioned

Expected result The project will contribute a model for the enabling of person-centred communication in connection to CRC surgery. There are many people who will benefit of improved support for the specific group of patients, since CRC is a common type of cancer affecting women and men and where surgery is the most common treatment. Evaluations with a combination of methods increase the possibility to explain the significance of the intervention and how it can be implemented. The design of the intervention model, including a video and workshop outline for the introduction of the intervention model to health care professionals, facilitates direct clinical implementation if the evaluation will be proved effective. The written interactive PEM developed and tested is general for the Swedish context and include a generic approach for how to design the interactive PEM to other groups of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Health Communication
  • Clinical trial
  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Colorectal surgery
  • Continuity of patient care
  • Medical-surgical nursing
  • Qualitative Research
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 488 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Göteborg University is the lead sponsor of 265 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing planned surgery for cancer in colon or rectum

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • receiving preoperative chemotherapy
  • receiving long-term preoperative radiation
  • diagnosed metastasis
  • post-surgical diagnosis of benign tumors
  • undergoing emergency surgery
  • having reduced cognitive function
  • lacking ability to communicate in Swedish
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
488 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Conventional care. Patients were receiving several written patient education materials (PEMs), mostly related to specific parts or procedures related to the surgery and the recovery. Communication between patients and professionals during consultations occurred according to conventional care practice.

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    I. Written interactive PEM structured into chapters/phases of the care process. Designed to serve three purposes: 1. generic information of the surgery and recovery process on a group level to promote high readability, suitability and comprehensibility 2. arena of dialogues between patient and professionals; voicing concerns, share perspectives 3. for the patient to personally reflect on generic information. II. Person-centred communication in dialogues using the PEM as a supportive tool, facilitated by four communication strategies: 1. professionals guiding the patient through the care process 2. communicating an introduction, agenda and closing 3. being sensitive to the patient's questions, beliefs, experiences and resources 4. dialogue based on story, posing open-ended questions, and following up.

    Other: person-centred communication

Interventions

  • Otherperson-centred communication

    The intervention aimed to actively make use of a person-centred approach to support patients undergoing CRC surgery to be prepared for surgery, discharge and recovery in relation to CRC. This was accomplished through person-centred communication, which was based on a standardized dialogue tool with tailored written information material (component I), in combination with an approach for professionals to facilitate person-centred communication (component II) in consultations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Longitudinal Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ)

    measures change in preparedness for surgery and recovery over time in four domains: (i) searching for and making use of information (4 items), (ii) understanding and involvement in the care process (7 items), (iii) making sense of the recovery process (5 items), and (iv) support and access to medical care (7 items)

    Time frame: six months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0

    Functional status scales measuring physical functioning (5 items), emotional functioning (4 items), role functioning (2 items), cognitive functioning (2 items) and social functioning (2 items) and global health status/QoL (2 items), and symptom scales for fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), and pain (2 items), single items for dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhoea, and financial difficulties.

    Time frame: (1) before surgery, (2) six weeks after surgery, (3) three months after surgery and (4) six months after surgery

  2. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCS) Distress Thermometer (DT; Version 1.2013).

    A one item thermometer visual analogue scale, accompanied with a Problem list categorized into five subscales: practical (6 items), family (4 items), emotional (6 items), physical (22 items), and spiritual/religious (1 items).

    Time frame: (1) before surgery, (2) one week after surgery, (3) six weeks after surgery, (4) three months after surgery and (5) six months after surgery

  3. The Daily Coping Assessment instrument

    Number and types of pre-defined situational coping strategies used during the day to handle what the person perceives as the most stressful event, illness-related or not.

    Time frame: (1) one week after surgery and (2) six weeks after surgery.

  4. Communication in consultations

    Audio-recorded planned consultations between patients and professionals.

    Time frame: Pre-surgery

  5. Patients experience of the recovery process

    Audio-recorded individual narrative interviews with patients.

    Time frame: 6 months following surgery

  6. Orientation to Life Questionnaire (OLQ-13)

    13 items that measure sense of coherence on meaningfulness (4 items), manageability (4 items) and comprehensibility (5 items). Items are scored on 7-point scales.

    Time frame: (1) before surgery and (2) six months after surgery

  7. Length of stay at hospital in relation to surgery

    Days hospitalised; obtained from patients' medical records

    Time frame: (1) before surgery and (2) within 6 months after surgery

  8. Behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support: Telephone-calls

    Numbers of calls; obtained from patients' medical records

    Time frame: (1) before surgery and (2) within 6 months after surgery

  9. Behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support: Visits at outpatients clinics

    Numbers of visits; obtained from patients' medical records

    Time frame: (1) before surgery and (2) within 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Smith F, Carlsson E, Kokkinakis D, Forsberg M, Kodeda K, Sawatzky R, Friberg F, Ohlen J. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 5. PubMed 24290242 ↗
  • Oresland S, Friberg F, Maatta S, Ohlen J. Disclosing discourses: biomedical and hospitality discourses in patient education materials. Nurs Inq. 2015 Sep;22(3):240-8. doi: 10.1111/nin.12097. Epub 2015 Apr 6. PubMed 25847051 ↗
  • Carlsson E, Pettersson M, Hyden LC, Ohlen J, Friberg F. Structure and content in consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 5. PubMed 24012188 ↗
  • Pettersson ME, Ohlen J, Friberg F, Hyden LC, Carlsson E. Topics and structure in preoperative nursing consultations with patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Dec;31(4):674-686. doi: 10.1111/scs.12378. Epub 2016 Nov 8. PubMed 27859450 ↗
  • Friberg F, Liden E, Hakanson C, Ohlen J. Communicating bodily changes: physicians' ways of enabling patient understanding in gastrointestinal cancer consultations. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):661-71. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000352. Epub 2014 May 2. PubMed 24784141 ↗
  • Carlsson E, Pettersson M, Ohlen J, Sawatzky R, Smith F, Friberg F. Development and validation of the preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire: PCSQ-pre 24. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 21. PubMed 27865249 ↗
  • Sawatzky R, Russell L, Friberg F, Carlsson EK, Pettersson M, Ohlen J. Longitudinal person-centered measurement: A psychometric evaluation of the Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ). Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):827-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 15. PubMed 27955903 ↗
  • Smith F, Ohlen J, Persson LO, Carlsson E. Daily Assessment of Stressful events and Coping in early post-operative recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12829. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12829. Epub 2018 Jan 24. PubMed 29363821 ↗
  • Smith F, Wallengren Gustafsson C & Öhlén J. (2017) Participatory design in education materials in health care context. Action Research 15(3), 310-336.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03587818
Lead sponsor
Göteborg University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2018
Start date
Nov 1, 2012
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2015
Completion
Apr 30, 2016
Last update
Jul 16, 2018

Study contacts

Joakim Öhlén, PhD
principal investigator · Göteborg University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion