CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03584789DIODEUpdated Aug 30, 2022Results posted

De-Implementing Opioids for Dental Extractions

An interventional study of Clinical Decision Support and Patient education in Tooth Extraction, sponsored by HealthPartners Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-30.

Sponsored by HealthPartners Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,722
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overarching goal of this project is to de-implement the reliance on opioid analgesics and to implement reliance on non-opioid analgesics to manage postoperative pain following dental extractions. Using a prospective, provider-level, 3-arm cluster randomized trial design, the investigators will compare different strategies to reduce the reliance on opioids and increase the use of alternative pain management approaches utilizing information support tools aimed at both providers and their patients.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this project is to de-implement the use of opioid analgesics for the management of postoperative pain following dental extractions and to implement effective alternative pain management. The investigators propose a cluster-randomized trial design in which dental practitioners will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions involving different implementation strategies. The first condition, Standard Practice, will serve as a control condition. The second condition will implement a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that will extract patient history and interface with the state prescription drug monitoring program to provide personalized recommendations for analgesic prescribing and offer language for discussing optimal, evidence-based non-opioid pain management with dental extraction patients. The third condition will involve an enhanced version of the CDS (CDS-E) that will also include information regarding optimal, evidence-based, non-opioid pain management delivered directly to the patient both before and following the dental extraction visit. The investigators will examine opioid and non-opioid prescribing data from the electronic health record across study arms as well as other provider- and patient-focused outcomes using mixed methods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tooth Extraction

Keywords

  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical
  • Pain Management
  • Analgesics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

PATIENTS

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a dental extraction of a permanent teeth performed by an eligible HealthPartners provider during the intervention period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have opted out of research at HealthPartners
  • Meet above age criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5,722 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Practice

    The patients in this arm were part of usual care with their dental provider.

  • Experimental
    Clinical Decision Support

    A clinical decision support system designed to assist dentists in providing optimal pain management for patients without resorting to opioids when a non-opioid alternative would suffice. It provides pertinent clinical information to the dentist, including point-of-care access to the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.

    Other: Clinical Decision Support

  • Experimental
    Clinical Decision Support + Education

    Patient education regarding pain management before and after dental extraction, including information about the risks and benefits of various strategies.

    Other: Clinical Decision Support · Other: Patient education

Interventions

  • OtherClinical Decision Support

    A clinical decision support system designed to assist dentists in providing optimal pain management for patients without resorting to opioids when a non-opioid alternative would suffice. It provides pertinent clinical information to the dentist, including point-of-care access to the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.

  • OtherPatient education

    Patient education regarding pain management before and after dental extraction, including information about the risks and benefits of various strategies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Prescribing at the Extraction Encounter

    Number of participants prescribed an opioid.

    Time frame: At the extraction encounter

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exclusive Non-opioid Prescribing or Recommendations at the Extraction Encounter

    Number of participants prescribed or recommended non-opioid analgesics (ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin, or acetaminophen) and did not prescribe opioids (at the time of the extraction encounter).

    Time frame: At the extraction encounter

  2. Compare the Study Arm Differences in Shared Decision-making

    The CollaboRATE scale measures shared decision making and consists of the mean of three items, each rated on a 0 ("no effort was made") to 4 ("every effort was made") scale. The possible range for the composite score is 0-4, with a higher score on the scale indicating that more shared decision-making occurred.

    Time frame: 3-6 days after the extraction encounter

  3. Compare the Study Arm Differences in Patient Experiences of Post-extraction Pain

    Study arm comparison of the average patient-reported pain 3 days following the extraction encounter. (Numeric Rating Scale, 0 'no pain at all' - 10 'worst pain imaginable')

    Time frame: 3-6 days after the extraction encounter

07

Results

Posted Jul 19, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Started173922971686
Completed172022691660
Not completed192826
Withdrew: Refused ehr permission192823
Withdrew: Patients tied to a provider who retired003

Outcome measures

PrimaryOpioid Prescribing at the Extraction Encounter

Number of participants prescribed an opioid.

Time frame:
At the extraction encounter
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Opioid Prescribing at the Extraction Encounter
ParticipantsStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Opioid Prescribing at the Extraction Encounter443643418
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .08 · Odds ratio (or): 1.29 · 97.5% CI .93 to 1.80
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support + Education · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .18 · Odds ratio (or): 1.24 · 97.5% CI .86 to 1.79
SecondaryExclusive Non-opioid Prescribing or Recommendations at the Extraction Encounter

Number of participants prescribed or recommended non-opioid analgesics (ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin, or acetaminophen) and did not prescribe opioids (at the time of the extraction encounter).

Time frame:
At the extraction encounter
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Exclusive Non-opioid Prescribing or Recommendations at the Extraction Encounter
ParticipantsStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Exclusive Non-opioid Prescribing or Recommendations at the Extraction Encounter714888566
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .71 · Odds ratio (or): 1.37 · 97.5% CI .20 to 9.44
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support + Education · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .62 · Odds ratio (or): 1.53 · 97.5% CI .21 to 11.00
SecondaryCompare the Study Arm Differences in Shared Decision-making

The CollaboRATE scale measures shared decision making and consists of the mean of three items, each rated on a 0 ("no effort was made") to 4 ("every effort was made") scale. The possible range for the composite score is 0-4, with a higher score on the scale indicating that more shared decision-making occurred.

Time frame:
3-6 days after the extraction encounter
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Compare the Study Arm Differences in Shared Decision-making
score on a scaleStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Compare the Study Arm Differences in Shared Decision-making3.3 (3.2 to 3.5)3.3 (3.2 to 3.4)3.3 (3.2 to 3.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .38 · Median difference (net): -0.07 · 95% CI -0.26 to .12
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support + Education · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .70 · Median difference (net): -0.03 · 95% CI -0.24 to .17
SecondaryCompare the Study Arm Differences in Patient Experiences of Post-extraction Pain

Study arm comparison of the average patient-reported pain 3 days following the extraction encounter. (Numeric Rating Scale, 0 'no pain at all' - 10 'worst pain imaginable')

Time frame:
3-6 days after the extraction encounter
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Compare the Study Arm Differences in Patient Experiences of Post-extraction Pain
score on a scaleStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Compare the Study Arm Differences in Patient Experiences of Post-extraction Pain3.8 (3.3 to 4.3)3.7 (3.2 to 4.1)3.5 (3.0 to 4.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .65 · Mean difference (net): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.79 to .50
  • Standard Practice vs Clinical Decision Support + Education · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .41 · Mean difference (net): -0.29 · 95% CI -0.99 to .41

Adverse events

Collected over Through 7 days following the extraction encounter.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Practice0/1,720 (0%)0/1,720 (0%)0/1,720 (0%)
Clinical Decision Support0/2,269 (0%)0/2,269 (0%)1/2,269 (0%)
Clinical Decision Support + Education0/1,660 (0%)0/1,660 (0%)0/1,660 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + Education
Pain at siteSurgical and medical procedures0/17201/22690/1660

Baseline characteristics

73 participants declined use of their EHR data

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + EducationTotal
<=18 years11515189355
Between 18 and 65 years1290159811364024
>=65 years3155204351270
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + EducationTotal
Mean45.4 ± 19.446.6 ± 20.649.7 ± 20.047.2 ± 20.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + EducationTotal
Female101912849373240
Male7019857232409
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + EducationTotal
Hispanic or Latino9111371275
Not Hispanic or Latino1274147910733826
Unknown or Not Reported3556775161548
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard PracticeClinical Decision SupportClinical Decision Support + EducationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native13171141
Asian142183132457
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2237
Black or African American3244212841029
White95312179503120
More than one race14291053
Unknown or Not Reported272400270942
08

Study locations

1 site
  • HealthPartners Dental Group
    Bloomington, Minnesota 55425, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rindal DB, Asche SE, Gryczynski J, Kane SM, Truitt AR, Shea TL, Ziegenfuss JY, Schwartz RP, Worley DC, Mitchell SG. De-Implementing Opioid Use and Implementing Optimal Pain Management Following Dental Extractions (DIODE): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 12;10(4):e24342. doi: 10.2196/24342. PubMed 33843594 ↗
  • Mitchell SG, Truitt AR, Davin LM, Rindal DB. Pain management after third molar extractions in adolescents: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03261-x. PubMed 35392856 ↗
  • Rindal DB, Asche SE, Kane S, Truitt AR, Worley DC, Davin LM, Gryczynski J, Mitchell SG. Patient, Provider Type, and Procedure Type Factors Associated with Opioid Prescribing by Dentists in a Health Care System. J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 20;14:3309-3319. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S330598. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34707399 ↗
  • Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12. PubMed 23768763 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 28, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data outputs: patient survey data, Electronic Health Record (EHR) study data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03584789
Lead sponsor
HealthPartners Institute
Collaborators
Friends Research Institute, Inc., National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2018
Start date
Feb 17, 2020
Primary completion
May 14, 2021
Completion
May 21, 2021
Results posted
Jul 19, 2022
Last update
Aug 30, 2022

Study contacts

D. Brad Rindal, DDS
principal investigator · HealthPartners Institute
Shannon G. Mitchell, PhD
principal investigator · Friends Research Institute, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion