ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03568669Updated Sep 3, 2026

Neurocognition in Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS)

An observational study in Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome, Congenital Central Hypoventilation and CCHS, sponsored by Ilya Khaytin. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Ilya Khaytin · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2016; still recruiting 10 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
3 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is a rare disorder of autonomic and respiratory regulation that frequently alters oxygen delivery to the brain. In CCHS, neurocognitive function has been of great concern because of the potential for repeated hypoxemia and hypercarbia in activities of daily living in addition to hypoventilation with related hypoxemia and hypercarbia during sleep. As the world's leading referral center for CCHS, the Center for Autonomic Medicine in Pediatrics (CAMP) is engaged in ongoing research to identify factors that impact neurocognitive performance in patients with CCHS in order to optimize clinical management and improve long term neurocognitive outcomes.

The purpose of this IRB-approved research study is to implement the NIH Toolbox as a standard measurement of cognitive health in patients with CCHS. Further, the study aims to determine how intrinsic and extrinsic disease factors such as age at diagnosis, PHOX2B mutation type and genotype, and nature of past and present artificial respiratory intervention affect the NIH Toolbox Cognitive scores of individuals with CCHS. Eligible participants will complete a 45-minute NIH Toolbox assessment and parents (or adult participants) will complete an associated, 15-minute Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

CCHS is a genetic autonomic nervous system disorder caused by heterozygous mutations in the PHOX2B gene. 90-92% are caused by polyalanine repeat expansion mutations (PARMs) with 4 to 13 additional alanines on the affected allele in the 20 alanine repeat region of exon 3 (resulting genotype is 20/24-20/33). The remaining 8-10% of PHOX2B mutations are non-PARMs including missense, nonsense, frameshift or stop codon mutations. And less than 1% of CCHS patients are heterozygous for a large deletion eliminating the entire PHOX2B gene and potentially other neighboring genes. Different causative mutations vary in the level of associated protein dysfunction, leading to variability in the severity of the CCHS phenotype, and potentially in the severity and frequency of resulting neurocognitive insult. Severe cyanotic breath-holding spells and prolonged sinus pauses are two phenotypic features of CCHS known to alter regional blood flow/oxygen saturation to the brain (near-infrared spectroscopy; personal communication 2018). The fact that both of these phenotypic presentations are associated with particular PHOX2B genotypes suggests that genetic factors, intrinsic to CCHS pathology, might influence neurocognitive outcomes.

A recent report suggests that a number of extrinsic factors might also affect neurocognitive performance in patients with CCHS with later identification and less than conservative management in terms of artificial ventilation. While all cases of CCHS require assisted ventilation during sleep, some more severe cases require 24-hour/day artificial ventilation. Methods of assisted ventilation differ case-by-case and are chosen based on several factors, including the patient's level of alveolar hypoventilation, physician recommendation, and a family's ability to provide the recommended support. While these mechanisms are all meant to ensure optimal ventilation, the level of physiological oxygen stability and the stability of carbon dioxide levels provided with each varies. Thus, methods of respiratory assistance are likely to influence neurocognitive outcomes.

Currently, there is no standard mechanism for examining the neurocognitive impact that intrinsic pathology (PHOX2B genotype) and extrinsic factors (age of diagnosis and method of respiratory assistance) have on CCHS patients across age groups and between sites. In order to establish such a standard, this study aims to use a brief and reliable cognitive battery called the NIH Toolbox at multiple sites. The NIH Toolbox was developed to standardize evaluations in specific clinical populations for investigations of neurological development and change, disease recovery, and therapeutic interventions. The Toolbox consists of a series of cognitive assessments of executive function, attention, memory, and language designed for broad use across age groups from childhood to adulthood.

Participants in this study will initially be recruited during clinical visits at the Ann \& Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Seattle Children's Hospital, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles as well as at meetings of the CCHS Family Network. All participants will complete a 45-minute NIH Toolbox cognitive assessment that is administered on an iPad by trained study staff. Additionally, parents (or adult participants) will complete a simple, 15-minute, electronic REDCap questionnaire designed to obtain basic information including PHOX2B genotype, age of CCHS diagnosis, past and present artificial ventilation interface (example mask, tracheostomy, etc.), past and present mode of artificial ventilation (positive pressure ventilator, negative pressure ventilator, phrenic nerve-diaphragm pacers), phenotype, and disease history. After initial participation, study subjects will complete the Toolbox and questionnaire at annual clinic visits or potentially at CCHS Family Network meetings to allow for longitudinal data collection.

The study will validate the NIH Toolbox as an assessment of cognitive performance and longitudinal cognitive outcomes in CCHS patients. Additionally, the study will characterize the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic disease factors on the neurocognitive outcomes of affected individuals in order optimize care for CCHS patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome
  • Congenital Central Hypoventilation
  • CCHS
  • CCHS With Hirschsprung Disease
  • CCHS With Neural Crest Tumor
  • CCHS With Neuroblastoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • NIH Toolbox
  • Toolbox
  • Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome
  • CCHS
  • Autonomic Nervous System Dysregulation
  • PHOX2B
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Central

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Central; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 148 across 36 observational studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Central.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Central studies →

Lead sponsor

Ilya Khaytin is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

PHOX2B mutation-confirmed CCHS patients between 3-85 years of age, who speak and read English as a primary language.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • PHOX2B mutation-confirmed CCHS diagnosis
  • Speaks and reads English as a primary language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuspected or unconfirmed CCHS
  • Does not speak or read English as a primary language
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
20 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • OtherNIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

    An app-based cognitive assessment of executive function, attention, memory, and language that takes approximately 45 minutes to complete on an iPad

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurocognitive Outcomes

    Longitudinal neurocognitive outcomes in CCHS patients

    Time frame: January 2016 - December 2030

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neourcognitive Outcomes

    Longitudinal neurocognitive outcomes based on participant age, PHOX2B genotype, and history of respiratory intervention

    Time frame: January 2016 - December 2030

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03568669
Lead sponsor
Ilya Khaytin
Responsible party
Ilya Khaytin (Principal Investigator, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2018
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Study contacts

Casey Rand, BS
Contact
crand@luriechildrens.org
312-227-3300
Erin S Lonergan, BS
Contact
CAMP@LurieChildrens.org

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion