An interventional study of aromatherapy in Chronic Pain, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-25.
Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
In recent decades, following an increased longevity in Hong Kong, there is a drastic increase in the prevalence chronic conditions, including chronic pain, seems to be the main reasons of suffering for many older adults. This condition not only pose a burden to the whole family but also the healthcare system.
While conventional treatment of chronic pain using pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological treatments has been effective for managing symptoms, owing to the adverse side effects caused by anti-psychotic drugs and the short effective period incurred by non-pharmacological interventions, development of alternative and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of pain is of urgent need. Research has shown that aromatherapy (both administered through inhalation and therapeutic massage) has been effective in reducing showing pain-relieving effects. These findings support the premise that aromatherapy and the investigators hope to provide further evidence to support the use of aromatherapy as an evidence-based mainstream intervention for pain relief in older adults with chronic pain.
Whilst there is sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of aromatherapy, few studies compared the effectiveness of the use of aromatherapy by inhalation and/or therapeutic massage. The investigators aim to address the above research gaps on the clinical application of aromatherapy on chronic pain, with a focus on comparing the differential effectiveness between administration by inhalation and administration by therapeutic massage. The proposed research aims to (1) test the efficacy and effectiveness of aromatherapy on the symptom management of chronic pain in older adults; (2) compare the effects of aromatherapy-scent (i.e., inhalation) and aromatherapy-touch (i.e., therapeutic massage) in older adults with chronic pain. This study also explores the benefits of aromatherapy on cognitive functioning, functional performance and social engagement as secondary outcomes.
A randomized, controlled, and single blinded trial is proposed. 120 older adults with chronic pain will be randomly assigned to aroma inhalation (intervention), aroma-touch or wait-list (control) treatments. Pain intensity and subjective changes in mood states (primary outcome), cognitive functioning, functional performance and social engagement (secondary outcome) will be assessed three times: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment. If the study hypotheses are supported, the findings will provide empirical support for a treatment option that could improve manage the symptoms of patients diagnosed with chronic conditions, and also improve cognitive functioning, functional performance, and social engagement of older adults.
2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.
Browse Chronic Pain studies →The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 250 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: aromatherapy
Other: aromatherapy
Each of participants in the aromatherapy (inhalation) group will receive inhalation aromatherapy and those in the aromatherapy (massage) group will receive aromatherapeutic massage. As to the waiting control group, participants will be given either one of these two interventions after the implementation phase is completed.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be used to measure the changes of pain among three time points within four months. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").
Time frame: the change from baseline to the completion of intervention (16 weeks later)
Cantonese Version of the Mini-mental State Examination (CMMSE)
Cantonese Version of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is a brief 30-point questionnaire used to assess the change of the cognitive functions among three time points at four months. The range of the score is from 0 point to 30 points, which a lower score indicates the worse cognitive functions.
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
Chinese Version of the Barthel Index-100
Chinese Version of the Barthel Index-100 is used to measure the change of the performance in activities of daily living (ADL) among three time points at four months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence.
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
Index of Social Engagement(ISE)
The change of the social engagement among three time points at four months will be measured using the 6-item index of social engagement (ISE). Total scores on the ISE can range from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating a higher level of social engagement.
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
Profile of Mood States (POMS)- Shorterned Chinese Version
The Chinese abbreviated version of the Profile of Mood States will be used to subjective changes in mood states among three time points at four months. There are 40 items, where participants will rate on a scale of 0(not at all)-5(extremely) and higher score indicates more distress.
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University