ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03556085Updated Jun 22, 2023

Venous Sinus Stenting With the River Stent in IIH

An interventional study of Venous sinus stenting (Serenity River) in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, sponsored by Serenity Medical, Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by Serenity Medical, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 16 studies in Pseudotumor Cerebri with a site in United States — 2 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Pseudotumor Cerebri · United States.

Enrollment
6th of 11
39 · median 39
Started
2018
the only one that year
No phase
6 of 16
none open now
Registered
10th of 16
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 16
Serenity Medical, Inc.

Among the 16 studies in Pseudotumor Cerebri with a site in United States, this one is the 6th largest by enrollment of the 11 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 6 with no phase, and was the 10th registered.

By phase

16 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study6 · 0 open
Observational5 · 1 open
Phase 32 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2018.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 39 across the 11 interventional studies, 18 across the 5 observational. Of the 9 that completed or were terminated, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Pseudotumor Cerebri with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective of the study is to show that stenting the transverse-sigmoid sinus with the River stent is safe and has probable benefit to relieve clinical symptoms in subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

The study will enroll 39 IIH subjects with moderate to severe visual field loss or severe headaches that have failed medical therapy.

The primary safety endpoint is the rate of major adverse event at 12 months The primary probable benefit endpoint is a composite at 12 months of absence of significant sinus stenosis and clinically relevant improvement.

Read the detailed description

Study objective: The objective of the study is to show that stenting the transverse-sigmoid sinus with the River stent is safe and has probable benefit to relieve clinical symptoms in subjects with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

Investigational product: Serenity River Stent System

Study design: prospective, multicenter, single arm, open label clinical trial

Subject population: IIH subjects with significant (>50%) stenosis of the transverse-sigmoid sinuses and moderate to severe visual field loss or severe headaches that have failed medical therapy. In the absence of this trial, subjects would have been offered a surgical treatment of IIH such as sinus stenting with an off-label device, cerebrospinal fluid shunting, or optic nerve sheath fenestration by the treating physician.

  • For subjects with visual field loss: if moderate to severe visual field loss (mean deviation between -6db and -30 db) for at least 2 weeks despite escalation of acetazolamide to 1000 mg twice a day or if the visual field deteriorates by more than 2 db during treatment, or treatment intolerance.
  • For subjects with headaches: if they have severe headaches (HIT > 59) for at least 4 weeks despite treatment with topiramate 100 mg twice a day or other headache medication, or treatment intolerance.

Enrollment size and sites: 39 subjects will be enrolled in up to 10 US sites.

Primary safety endpoint: Major Adverse Event at 12 months. The MAE is a composite of the following: moderate or severe stroke (NIHSS > 3), neurological death, perforation or thrombosis of sinus or cerebral vein, device distal embolization, need for target lesion revascularization or need for alternate IIH surgical procedure such as cerebrospinal fluid shunting or optic nerve sheath fenestration.

Primary probable benefit endpoint: a composite at 12 months of:

  • Absence of significant (>50%) stenosis of the stented sinus on retrograde catheter venography and
  • Trans-stent pressure gradient \< 8 mm Hg and
  • Clinically relevant improvement in the main clinical outcome per specific inclusion criteria and stabilization or better of the other:

    • Headaches: if the specific inclusion criteria was headaches, improvement in the HIT- 6 scale by > 4 points and improvement or stabilization of visual field.
    • Ophthalmic: if the specific inclusion criteria was visual field loss, improvement of visual field by > 29% of the baseline value in the study eye, stabilization or improvement in the fellow eye, and improvement or stabilization of headaches.

Study duration and follow-up: The subjects will be followed at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. At 12 months, clinical examination, lumbar puncture and retrograde catheter venography with manometry will be performed to evaluate the patency of the treated sinus and the absence of trans-stent pressure gradient. Subjects will be consented to be clinically followed annually for up to 5 years.

03

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • venous sinus stenting
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for participation in the study:

  1. Subject is > 18 year-old and has given .
  2. Diagnosis of IIH per Modified Dandy Criteria.
  3. CSF opening pressure is > 25 cm H2O.
  4. Radiological examination (magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or computed tomographic venography (CTV)) shows bilateral transverse-sigmoid venous sinus stenosis (> 50%) or unilateral stenosis of the dominant sinus with contralateral hypoplastic sinus.
  5. Presence of IIH clinical symptoms (6. OR 7.)
  6. Headaches: Score > 59 (severe impact) on the HIT-6 scale, to medical therapy (e.g. acetazolamide 1000 mg twice daily, topiramate 100 mg twice daily, or other headache medication) for ≥ 4 weeks, or treatment intolerance OR
  7. Visual field loss: defined by perimetric mean deviation (PMD) between -6 dB and -30 dB in one or both eyes (with papilledema Grade >1) despite at least 2 weeks of medical therapy with acetazolamide 1000 mg twice daily, or if the visual field deteriorates by more than 2 dB during treatment, or treatment intolerance.
  8. In the absence of this study, the subject would have been offered a surgical intervention by Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration (ONSF), Cerebro Spinal Fluid (CSF) shunting procedure, or venous sinus stenting with an off-label device.
  9. Catheter manometry shows a pressure gradient > 8 mm Hg across the transverse sigmoid sinus stenosis.
  10. Venographic evidence of sinus stenosis (> 50%)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject must be excluded from participation in this study if any of the following criteria are met

  1. Subjects presenting with de novo papilledema and severe visual field(VF) deficit (VF loss > -15db) that requires immediate surgical treatment without prior attempt of medical therapy.
  2. Currently has or plans to have an implanted CSF shunt.
  3. History of previously implanted intra-cranial sinus stent.
  4. Transverse-sigmoid sinus vessel size \<5 mm or >10 mm.
  5. Creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl and/or \< 60 mL/min (except if patients is already on hemodialysis).
  6. Allergic to imaging contrast media (iodine or gadolinium) despite premedication.
  7. Allergic to nitinol or nickel.
  8. to general anesthesia.
  9. Contra-indication to aspirin, clopidogrel or other anticoagulant.
  10. Hypercoagulable state (Factor V Leiden, Protein C or S deficiency, Anticardiolipin antibodies, Lupus anticoagulant, B2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, or Hyperhomocysteinemia).
  11. Currently requiring full anti-coagulation for other medical reasons, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), artificial valves, deep vein thrombosis pulmonary embolism, etc.
  12. History of stroke or (TIA).
  13. History of AF or other risks of stroke.
  14. History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
  15. History of severe or other severe respiratory disease.
  16. History of severe carotid atherosclerotic disease.
  17. History of heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, or congenital heart conditions, etc. that are at high thrombogenic risk.
  18. History of uncontrolled diabetes.
  19. Use (oral) of tetracycline derivative, retinoid or vitamin A during the last 3 months.
  20. Cerebral vascular lesions (arteriovenous malformation (AVM), arteriovenous fistula, aneurysms, significant stenosis of extra- or intra-cranial vessels other than the targeted venous sinus stenosis,intracranial artery dissection, etc.).
  21. Patient has visions loss due to other disease (e.g. cataract, macular degeneration, glaucoma, etc.).
  22. Inability to provide reliable and reproducible visual field examinations (>15% false positive errors and/or failure to maintain fixation for eye monitoring).
  23. For female subject of child bearing potential, pregnant or not willing to use for 12 months.
  24. Presence of a physical, mental or social condition that could prevent adequate one-year follow-up (homelessness, drug dependency, anticipation of moving far away, life threatening disease, terminal illness).
  25. Anatomical anomaly of the venous sinus which would prevent safe catheterization and stenting (e.g multi-channel sinus)
  26. Currently enrolled in a premarket study. Enrollment in a post market study that does not impact the River™ Stent procedure or device is allowed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Venous sinus stenting

    Subjects will have stenting of the transverse-sigmoid sinus

    Device: Venous sinus stenting (Serenity River)

Interventions

  • DeviceVenous sinus stenting (Serenity River)

    Patient is placed under general anesthesia. From femoral vein access, a standard guide-catheter is advanced in the internal jugular vein (on the side considered for stenting). The sigmoid then transverse sinus is catheterized with a microcatheter and guide-wire and an exchange guide-wire is placed in the superior sagittal sinus. The River stent delivery catheter is advanced over the exchange guide-wire in the sigmoid then transverse sinus up to the torcula. The River stent is deployed to cover the entire transverse sinus and the proximal half of the sigmoid sinus. The catheters are removed and hemostasis obtained by using a closure device or manual compression. The patient is kept overnight in the hospital for observation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Event (MAE)

    The MAE is a composite of the following: Moderate or severe stroke (NIH stroke scale \> 3) Neurological death Perforation of sinus or cerebral vein Thrombosis of sinus or cerebral vein Device distal embolization Need for target lesion revascularization or need for IIH alternate procedure (cerebrospinal fluid shunting or optic nerve sheath fenestration)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Clinical improvement with no restenosis of the venous sinus

    The primary probable benefit endpoint is a composite of: 1. Absence of significant stenosis (defined as \>50% stenosis of reference vessel diameter) of the main dural venous sinus on retrograde catheter venography (RCV) AND 2. Trans-stent pressure gradient (measured during the RCV) \< 8 mm Hg AND 3. Clinically relevant improvement in the main clinical outcome per specific inclusion criteria (headache or ophthalmic) and stabilization or better of the other

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Individual components of MAE.

    Components of MAE will be reported as individual event rates.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure at 12 months

    CSF opening pressure will be measured via lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Stent patency at 12 months

    Stent patency will be assessed by retrograde catheter venography. Patency is defined as absence of significant (\>50%) stenosis

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Medications

    Change in IIH medications and dosage at 12 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Headaches

    Change in headaches assessed using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scale (minimum score 36, maximum 78; higher value represents worse headache) at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Papilledema

    Change in papilledema grading using Frisen scale (Stage 0 to 5; stage 0 represents no papilledema and is the best outcome) at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Visual acuity

    Change in visual acuity using the Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) chart at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness

    Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Tinnitus

    Change in the intensity of tinnitus evaluated on the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) score (overall score; minimum 0, maximum 100; 100 is the worst tinnitus with the worst negative impact) at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Quality of Life SF-12

    Change in quality of life assessed with the Short Form health survey 12 items (SF-12) at 12 months compared to baseline

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Quality of Life NEI-VFQ-25

    Change in quality of life assessed with the National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 at 12 months compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Albuquerque FC, Gross BA, Levitt MR. Time to re-assess the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):549-50. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012460. No abstract available. PubMed 27178402 ↗
  • Abubaker K, Ali Z, Raza K, Bolger C, Rawluk D, O'Brien D. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: lumboperitoneal shunts versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts--case series and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;25(1):94-9. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.544781. PubMed 21323404 ↗
  • Aguilar-Perez M, Martinez-Moreno R, Kurre W, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Unsold R, Henkes H. Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results in 51 patients. Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1783-5. Epub 2017 Mar 2. PubMed 28255904 ↗
  • Ahmed RM, Wilkinson M, Parker GD, Thurtell MJ, Macdonald J, McCluskey PJ, Allan R, Dunne V, Hanlon M, Owler BK, Halmagyi GM. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;32(8):1408-14. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2575. Epub 2011 Jul 28. PubMed 21799038 ↗
  • Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Results of a Prospective Trial. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(2):113-121. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000426. PubMed 27556959 ↗
  • Kanagalingam S, Subramanian PS. Cerebral venous sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: A review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 27. PubMed 25859134 ↗
  • Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Where Are We Now? Neurol Clin. 2017 Feb;35(1):59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.08.006. PubMed 27886896 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 49 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2018
First posted
Jun 14, 2018
StartActual
Aug 24, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2022
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 22, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03556085
Lead sponsor
Serenity Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 14, 2018
Start date
Aug 24, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2022
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Study contacts

Athos Patsalides, MD
principal investigator · Northwell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion