CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03542526Updated May 31, 2018

Relationship of Different Electrocardiographic Parameters and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters to Detect Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

An observational study in Hypertension, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-31.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
73
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To review the accuracy of electrocardiography in screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension.

Read the detailed description

Arterial hypertension is a major cause of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Several studies have shown that left ventricular hypertrophy is an important risk factor in patients with hypertension, leading to a fivefold to 10-fold increase in cardiovascular risk,1 2 3 4 5 which is similar to the increase seen in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.6 The presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, in addition to hypertension, thus has important implications for assessing risk and managing patients, including decisions on interventions other than antihypertensive treatment, such as lipid lowering treatment and lifestyle modifications.7 8 Accurate and early diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy is therefore an important component of the care of patients with hypertension.

Decisions about treatment should be based on assessments of hypertensive target organ damage and overall cardiovascular risk. The appropriate diagnostic work-up of suspected left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension is less clear, however. There is many electrocardiographic indexes for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy, based on the standard 12 lead electrocardiogram, have been described. Many of the proposed indexes have remained anecdotal, but others are commonly used, including the Sokolow-Lyon index,9 the Cornell voltage index,10 the Cornell product index,11 the Gubner index,12 and the Romhilt-Estes scores.13 However, debate about their comparative diagnostic value continues.14 15 We did a systematic review to clarify the accuracy of different electrocardiographic indexes, with emphasis on their ability to rule out left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with arterial hypertension.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 73 is below the median of 195 across 47 observational studies indexed under Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular.

Browse Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All eligible patients attending the Hypertension outpatient clinic over two year duration starting from November 2018, will be consecutively enrolled

Inclusion criteria

Patients ranging from 20t o 80 years attending the hypertension outpatient clinic for ambulatory blood pressure measurement will be consecutively enrolled

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with ischemic heart disease.
  2. Patients with advanced respiratory, renal, or hepatic disease
  3. Patients with uninterpretable ECG or ABPM recordings
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
73 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Deviceelectrogradiogram

    12 lead ecg ambulatory blood prussre

    Also known as: blood measuring device

  • Deviceambulatory blood prussre

    ambulatory blood pressure to measure blood pressure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. minimize complicate of hypertension

    screening with hypertensive patient

    Time frame: 1 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • AssiutU
    Assiut, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jain A, Tandri H, Dalal D, Chahal H, Soliman EZ, Prineas RJ, Folsom AR, Lima JA, Bluemke DA. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy defined by magnetic resonance imaging in relationship to ethnicity: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.035. PubMed 20362725 ↗
  • Pewsner D, Juni P, Egger M, Battaglia M, Sundstrom J, Bachmann LM. Accuracy of electrocardiography in diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension: systematic review. BMJ. 2007 Oct 6;335(7622):711. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39276.636354.AE. Epub 2007 Aug 28. PubMed 17726091 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — to maintain the privacy of the protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03542526
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Michael Sadeq (cardiology resident, principle investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 31, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2018

Study contacts

Yehia t Keshk, professor
Contact
yehia@aun.edu.eg
20882335120
Tarek a nagib, lecturer
Contact
Tarkaf76@yahoo.com
201099975128

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion