An observational study in Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 15 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-23.
Sponsored by Takeda · Observational
The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness by the clinical response at 6 weeks and the safety of vedolizumab intravenous in UC Korean participants.
This is a post-marketing, non-interventional study of participants with moderate to severe UC. The study will review medical records of participants who have initiated medical treatment with vedolizumab intravenous during the defined eligibility period under routine clinical practice to provide the real world data on the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab intravenous.
The study will enroll approximately 100 participants. All participants will be enrolled in one observational group: Vedolizumab
Both retrospective and prospective data will be collected in the index period, with prospective data collected for treatment baseline visit and follow up visits.
The multi-center trial will be conducted in Republic of Korea. The overall duration of study will be approximately 15 months.
1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 133 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 105 is close to the median of 105 across 248 observational studies indexed under Colitis.
Browse Colitis studies →Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,002 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.
Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 149 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe UC, having failed TNF-alpha antagonist therapy and who have initiated treatment with vedolizumab intravenous between 17 August 2017 and up until 100 participants are enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe active UC and having failed tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) antagonist therapy and who have initiated vedolizumab intravenous treatment between 17 August 2017 and the date when at least 100 cases are collected from approximately 15 participating sites will be observed from the date of UC diagnosis until the date when participant is enrolled into the study or until the end of treatment or death of participants or lost-to-follow up.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6 Based on Partial Mayo Score
Clinical response based on partial Mayo score was defined as a reduction of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30 percent (%) from the baseline Mayo score, with a decrease of at least 1 point on the rectal bleeding subscale, or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher score indicated more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interests (AESIs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From the index date (date when vedolizumab treatment was initiated) until the end of treatment, lost to follow-up or death (up to 15 months)
Percentage of Participants With Pregnancy During the Study
Time frame: From the index date (date when vedolizumab treatment was initiated) until the end of treatment, lost to follow-up or death (up to 15 months)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 14 Based on Partial Mayo Score
Clinical response was defined as a reduction of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30% from the baseline mayo score, with a decrease of at least 1 point on the rectal bleeding subscale, or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, endoscopic findings and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores are summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9. Here, higher scores indicated more severe disease.
Time frame: Week 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 6 and Week 14 Based on Partial Mayo Score
Clinical remission was defined as a total mayo score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no sub-score greater than (\>) 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher score indicated more severe disease.
Time frame: Weeks 6 and 14
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Weeks 6 and 14
Mucosal healing was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 compared to baseline. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Endoscopic findings was a sub-score of complete Mayo score, which ranges from 0 to 3 (0= Normal or inactive disease; 1= Mild disease; 2= Moderate disease; 3= Severe disease), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Weeks 6 and 14
Participants took part in the study at 13 investigative sites in South Korea from 17 August 2017 to 18 December 2018.
| Milestone | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Started | 105 |
| Completed | 105 |
| Not completed | 0 |
Clinical response based on partial Mayo score was defined as a reduction of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30 percent (%) from the baseline Mayo score, with a decrease of at least 1 point on the rectal bleeding subscale, or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher score indicated more severe disease.
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6 Based on Partial Mayo Score | 55.8 |
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| AESIs | 4.76 |
| SAEs | 4.76 |
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Pregnancy During the Study | 0.00 |
Clinical response was defined as a reduction of at least 3 points and a decrease of at least 30% from the baseline mayo score, with a decrease of at least 1 point on the rectal bleeding subscale, or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, endoscopic findings and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores are summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9. Here, higher scores indicated more severe disease.
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 14 Based on Partial Mayo Score | 73.2 |
Clinical remission was defined as a total mayo score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no sub-score greater than (\>) 1. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, most severe rectal bleeding of the day, and global assessment by physician, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher score indicated more severe disease.
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Week 6 | 18.2 |
| Week 14 | 39.4 |
Mucosal healing was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 compared to baseline. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Endoscopic findings was a sub-score of complete Mayo score, which ranges from 0 to 3 (0= Normal or inactive disease; 1= Mild disease; 2= Moderate disease; 3= Severe disease), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
| percentage of participants | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Week 6 | 22.2 |
| Week 14 | 49.2 |
Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that started after the first dose of study drug (index date) until end of treatment, lost to follow-up or death (up to 15 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vedolizumab | 0/105 (0%) | 5/105 (4.8%) | 16/105 (15.2%) |
| Event | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders | 3/105 |
| Mouth ulcerationGastrointestinal disorders | 1/105 |
| AdenoiditisInfections and infestations | 1/105 |
| Cytomegalovirus colitisInfections and infestations | 1/105 |
| Skin ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/105 |
| Event | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations | 4/105 |
| Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders | 3/105 |
| ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/105 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/105 |
| Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders | 1/105 |
| HaematocheziaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/105 |
| PainGeneral disorders | 1/105 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 1/105 |
| Clostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestations | 1/105 |
| Cytomegalovirus syndromeInfections and infestations | 1/105 |
The safety analysis set (SAS) consisted all enrolled participants who received at least one documented dose of study medication.
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 95 |
| >=65 years | 10 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Female | 38 |
| Male | 67 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Korea, Republic Of | 105 |
| Body Weight(kilogram (kg)) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Mean | 61.4 ± 12.0 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI)(kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Mean | 22.0 ± 3.47 |
| Smoking Status(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Current smoker | 4 |
| Former smoker | 31 |
| Never smoked | 62 |
| Unknown | 8 |
| Family History(Participants) | Vedolizumab |
|---|---|
| Crohn's disease | 0 |
| UC- Siblings | 2 |
| UC- Parent | 1 |
1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Takeda