CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03535194Updated Mar 30, 2021Results posted

A Study to Assess if Mirikizumab is Effective and Safe Compared to Secukinumab and Placebo in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (OASIS-2)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mirikizumab and Placebo in Psoriasis, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Completed at 178 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-30.

Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,484
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The reason for this study is to see how effective and safe mirikizumab is compared to secukinumab and placebo for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Interleukin-23 (IL-23)
03

In context

Psoriasis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Psoriasis; 233 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,484 is above the median of 70 across 1,447 interventional studies indexed under Psoriasis.

Browse Psoriasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company is the lead sponsor of 2,048 studies on the registry; 140 are open to participants now.

Of its 521 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 341 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must have chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must not be breastfeeding or nursing woman.
  • Participant must not have had serious, opportunistic, or chronic/recurring infection within 3 months.
  • Participant must not have received a Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination within 12 months or received live vaccine(s) (including attenuated live vaccines) within 12 weeks of baseline or intend to receive either during the study.
  • Participant must not have any other skin conditions (excluding psoriasis).
  • Participant must not have previous exposure to Cosentyx and any other biologic therapy targeting IL-17 (including Taltz).
  • Participant must not have received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics within 8 weeks.
  • Participant must not have previous exposure to any biologic therapy targeting IL-23 (including Stelara).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,484 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W Mirikizumab

    Participants received 250 Milligrams (mg) Mirikizumab once every four weeks (Q4W) by subcutaneous injection during blinded induction period followed by 250mg Mirikizumab once every eight weeks (Q8W) in maintenance period. Participants received matching placebo to blind Secukinumab.

    Drug: Mirikizumab

  • Experimental
    250mg Q4W/125mg Q8W Mirikizumab

    Participants received 250mg Mirikizumab once every four weeks (Q4W) by subcutaneous injection during blinded induction period followed by 125mg Mirikizumab once every eight weeks (Q8W) in maintenance period. Participants received matching placebo to blind Secukinumab.

    Drug: Mirikizumab

  • Experimental
    Placebo/250mg Mirikizumab

    Participants received matching placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 by subcutaneous injection during blinded induction period followed by 250mg Mirikizumab Q4W from week 16 to 32 followed by 250mg Mirikizumab Q8W from week 32 to 48 in maintenance period. Participants received matching placebo to blind Secukinumab.

    Drug: Mirikizumab · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    300mg Secukinumab

    Participants received 300mg Secukinumab at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 by subcutaneous injection during induction period followed by 300mg Secukinumab Q4W from week 16 to 52 in maintenance period.

    Drug: Secukinumab

  • Experimental
    Japan GPP/EP

    Participants received 250mg Mirikizumab Q4W in induction period followed by 250mg Q8W in maintenance period by subcutaneous injection.

    Drug: Mirikizumab

Interventions

  • DrugMirikizumab

    Administered SC

    Also known as: LY3074828

  • DrugPlacebo

    Administered SC

  • DrugSecukinumab

    Administered SC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline

    The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's psoriasis was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement in PASI 75

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement

    The BSA is the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's body surface on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), in which 1% corresponds to the size of the participant's hand (including the palm, fingers, and thumb). The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptom Score of 0 in Those With PSS Symptom Score of ≥1 at Baseline

    PSS is a patient-administered assessment of 4 symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, and burning); 3 signs (redness, scaling, and cracking); and 1 item on the discomfort related to symptoms/signs. The overall severity for each individual symptom/sign from the patient's psoriasis is indicated by selecting the number from a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom/sign in the past 24 hours, where 0=no symptom/sign and 10=worst imaginable symptom/sign. In addition, a symptoms score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst imaginable symptoms), and a signs score of 0 (no signs) to 30 (worst imaginable signs) will be reported. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5

    The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline

    The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by a score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement, ranging from 0 (no PPASI) to 72 (most severe PPASI). The PPASI was only assessed if participants have palmoplantar psoriasis at baseline. Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline

    The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

    The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix PsO by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed PsO 0 (none) to 4 (PsO in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix PsO 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix PsO in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  8. Change From Baseline on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)

    SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Assessment (PatGA) of Disease Severity of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline in Patients With a Baseline PatGA ≥2

    The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis "today" by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline for the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Scores

    The WPAI-PSO consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of psoriasis, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which psoriasis affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which psoriasis affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each WPAI score is expressed as impairment percentages (0-100) with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, that is, worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11.

    QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Whereas 0-5 indicates no symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  13. Pharmacokinetics: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab

    Minimum observed serum Ctrough,ss of mirikizumab

    Time frame: Week 16

  14. Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (Non-inferiority)

    The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's psoriasis was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

    Time frame: Week 16

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline (Non-inferiority)

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

07

Results

Posted Mar 30, 2021

Participant flow

Induction Period
Participant flow — Induction Period
Milestone250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W Mirikizumab250mg Q4W/125mg Q8W MirikizumabPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EP
Started45445111244819
Received at least one dose of study drug45445011244819
Completed44343410443719
Not completed11178110
Withdrew: Adverse event22130
Withdrew: Death01000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy13220
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up35230
Withdrew: Physician decision11000
Withdrew: Protocol violation10010
Withdrew: Screen failure01000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject34320
Maintenance Period
Participant flow — Maintenance Period
Milestone250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W Mirikizumab250mg Q4W/125mg Q8W MirikizumabPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EP
Started44343410443719
Completed4214189640013
Not completed22168376
Withdrew: Adverse event651114
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy32590
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up42152
Withdrew: Other12000
Withdrew: Physician decision12020
Withdrew: Pregnancy00020
Withdrew: Protocol violation01000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject72180
Post-Treatment Followup Period
Participant flow — Post-Treatment Followup Period
Milestone250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W Mirikizumab250mg Q4W/125mg Q8W MirikizumabPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EP
Started383518478
Completed27217238
Not completed111411240
Withdrew: Adverse event45180
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy34540
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11100
Withdrew: Other10050
Withdrew: Physician decision02110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject22360

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's psoriasis was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline6.3 (1.8 to 10.7)76.3 (72.4 to 80.3)79.7 (77.0 to 82.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 73.5 · 95% CI 68.2 to 78.7
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline6.3 (1.8 to 10.7)72.8 (68.6 to 76.9)74.4 (71.5 to 77.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 68.0 · 95% CI 62.7 to 73.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement in PASI 75

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement in PASI 75
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Improvement in PASI 758.0 (3.0 to 13.1)89.5 (86.7 to 92.3)89.5 (87.5 to 91.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 81.6 · 95% CI 76.1 to 87.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement

The BSA is the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's body surface on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), in which 1% corresponds to the size of the participant's hand (including the palm, fingers, and thumb). The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement1.8 (0.0 to 4.2)54.5 (49.9 to 59.1)53.1 (49.9 to 56.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 51.7 · 95% CI 47.6 to 55.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptom Score of 0 in Those With PSS Symptom Score of ≥1 at Baseline

PSS is a patient-administered assessment of 4 symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, and burning); 3 signs (redness, scaling, and cracking); and 1 item on the discomfort related to symptoms/signs. The overall severity for each individual symptom/sign from the patient's psoriasis is indicated by selecting the number from a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom/sign in the past 24 hours, where 0=no symptom/sign and 10=worst imaginable symptom/sign. In addition, a symptoms score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst imaginable symptoms), and a signs score of 0 (no signs) to 30 (worst imaginable signs) will be reported. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptom Score of 0 in Those With PSS Symptom Score of ≥1 at Baseline
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptom Score of 0 in Those With PSS Symptom Score of ≥1 at Baseline1.9 (0.0 to 4.4)28.7 (24.4 to 33.1)25.0 (22.1 to 27.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 23.2 · 95% CI 19.3 to 27.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5

The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥55.9 (1.3 to 10.6)60.4 (55.5 to 65.2)59.6 (56.2 to 62.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 53.5 · 95% CI 47.7 to 59.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline

The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by a score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement, ranging from 0 (no PPASI) to 72 (most severe PPASI). The PPASI was only assessed if participants have palmoplantar psoriasis at baseline. Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline-1.33 ± 1.030-5.79 ± 0.541-6.28 ± 0.383
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Lsmean difference: -4.94 · 95% CI -7.01 to -2.88
SecondaryChange in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline

The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline-3.62 ± 0.676-18.22 ± 0.365-18.78 ± 0.286
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Lsmean difference: -15.15 · 95% CI -16.51 to -13.80
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix PsO by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed PsO 0 (none) to 4 (PsO in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix PsO 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix PsO in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline0.20 ± 1.494-11.24 ± 0.774-9.38 ± 0.580
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Lsmean difference: -9.59 · 95% CI -12.63 to -6.55
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)

SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change From Baseline on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS)0.57 ± 0.6334.38 ± 0.3584.03 ± 0.291
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Lsmean difference: 3.46 · 95% CI 2.20 to 4.72
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)0.50 ± 0.7014.21 ± 0.3984.45 ± 0.321
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Lsmean difference: 3.96 · 95% CI 2.56 to 5.35
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Assessment (PatGA) of Disease Severity of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline in Patients With a Baseline PatGA ≥2

The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis "today" by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Assessment (PatGA) of Disease Severity of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline in Patients With a Baseline PatGA ≥2
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient's Global Assessment (PatGA) of Disease Severity of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline in Patients With a Baseline PatGA ≥27.3 (2.4 to 12.1)71.8 (67.6 to 76.1)72.3 (69.3 to 75.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 65.0 · 95% CI 59.3 to 70.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline for the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Scores

The WPAI-PSO consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of psoriasis, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which psoriasis affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which psoriasis affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each WPAI score is expressed as impairment percentages (0-100) with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline for the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO) Scores
Score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Absenteeism-0.48 ± 1.753-2.48 ± 0.995-2.20 ± 0.844
Presenteeism-3.36 ± 2.104-18.95 ± 1.204-18.95 ± 1.020
Overall work impairment-2.77 ± 2.448-18.49 ± 1.401-19.21 ± 1.187
Impairment in Activities Performed Outside of Work-5.86 ± 1.847-25.71 ± 1.061-24.17 ± 0.885
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11.

QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Whereas 0-5 indicates no symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11.
score on a scalePlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11.-4.79 ± 2.266-5.10 ± 0.935-5.28 ± 0.733
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · ANCOVA · p = 0.826 · Lsmean difference: -0.50 · 95% CI -4.96 to 3.96
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab

Minimum observed serum Ctrough,ss of mirikizumab

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Microgram per milliliter (ug/mL)
Pharmacokinetics: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab
Microgram per milliliter (ug/mL)Mirikizumab 250mg Q4W
Pharmacokinetics: Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab2.40 ± 112
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (Non-inferiority)

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's psoriasis was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (Non-inferiority)
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (Non-inferiority)6.3 (1.8 to 10.7)76.3 (72.4 to 80.3)79.7 (77.0 to 82.3)
Statistical analysis
  • 300mg Secukinumab vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 3.3 · 95% CI -1.4 to 7.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline (Non-inferiority)

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline (Non-inferiority)
percentage of participantsPlacebo300mg Secukinumab250mg Q4W Mirikizumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) From Baseline (Non-inferiority)6.3 (1.8 to 10.7)72.8 (68.6 to 76.9)74.4 (71.5 to 77.2)
Statistical analysis
  • 300mg Secukinumab vs 250mg Q4W Mirikizumab · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 1.6 · 95% CI -3.4 to 6.6

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 64 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo / Induction Period0/112 (0%)0/112 (0%)68/112 (60.7%)
300mg Secukinumab / Induction Period0/448 (0%)11/448 (2.5%)257/448 (57.4%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Induction Period1/904 (0.1%)15/904 (1.7%)520/904 (57.5%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Induction Period0/19 (0%)2/19 (10.5%)14/19 (73.7%)
300mg Secukinumab/Maintenance Period0/437 (0%)15/437 (3.4%)292/437 (66.8%)
125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period0/434 (0%)13/434 (3%)271/434 (62.4%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period0/443 (0%)10/443 (2.3%)282/443 (63.7%)
250mg Mirikizumab / Maintenance Period0/104 (0%)0/104 (0%)0/104 (0%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Maintenance Period0/18 (0%)3/18 (16.7%)14/18 (77.8%)
Placebo / Follow-up Period0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Follow-up Period0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)1/9 (11.1%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up Period0/29 (0%)3/29 (10.3%)3/29 (10.3%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up Period0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)6/35 (17.1%)
Placebo/250mg Mirikizumab / Follow-up Period0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)4/14 (28.6%)
250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)2/6 (33.3%)
300mg Secukinumab /300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)7/43 (16.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 70
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo / Induction Period300mg Secukinumab / Induction Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Induction Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Induction Period300mg Secukinumab/Maintenance Period125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Maintenance PeriodPlacebo / Follow-up Period300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up PeriodPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period300mg Secukinumab /300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period
CataractEye disorders0/1120/4480/9040/190/4370/4340/4430/1041/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
Radius fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1120/4480/9040/191/4370/4340/4430/1041/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
Pustular psoriasisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1120/4480/9040/190/4370/4340/4430/1041/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/1120/4480/9041/190/4371/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
Irritable bowel syndromeGastrointestinal disorders0/1120/4480/9041/190/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
MeningitisInfections and infestations0/1120/4480/9040/190/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/11/290/350/140/60/43
Lung adenocarcinoma stage iNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1120/4480/9040/190/4371/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/11/290/350/140/60/43
Malignant melanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1120/4480/9040/190/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/11/290/350/140/60/43
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1120/4480/9040/190/4372/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
NephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders0/1122/4480/9040/190/4370/4341/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 671
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo / Induction Period300mg Secukinumab / Induction Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Induction Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Induction Period300mg Secukinumab/Maintenance Period125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab / Maintenance Period250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Maintenance PeriodPlacebo / Follow-up Period300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/125mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W / Follow-up PeriodPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab / Follow-up Period250mg Mirikizumab Q4W/250mg Mirikizumab Q8W - Japan GPP/EP / Follow-up Period300mg Secukinumab /300mg Secukinumab / Follow-up Period
Irritable bowel syndromeGastrointestinal disorders1/1120/4480/9041/190/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/91/10/290/350/140/60/43
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations18/11255/448144/9044/1961/43760/43467/4430/1044/180/40/41/90/10/290/350/142/62/43
Diverticulum intestinalGastrointestinal disorders0/1120/4480/9040/191/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/141/60/43
Otitis mediaInfections and infestations0/1120/4480/9041/192/4372/4341/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/141/60/43
Biopsy skinInvestigations0/1120/4480/9040/190/4370/4340/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/141/60/43
Weight decreasedInvestigations0/1120/4482/9040/191/4373/4342/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/141/60/43
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders1/1124/44826/9041/193/43714/43414/4430/1042/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1121/4488/9040/192/4373/4344/4430/1040/180/40/41/90/10/290/350/140/60/43
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/1122/4484/9042/190/4370/4341/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/61/43
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/1124/44822/9042/198/4372/4344/4430/1040/180/40/40/90/10/290/350/140/60/43

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Mirikizumab 250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W250mg Mirikizumab /125mg Q8WPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EPTotal
<65417398103399141331
>=6537539495153
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mirikizumab 250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W250mg Mirikizumab /125mg Q8WPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EPTotal
Female158140301371466
Male29631182311181018
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mirikizumab 250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W250mg Mirikizumab /125mg Q8WPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EPTotal
Hispanic or Latino915410038
Not Hispanic or Latino797112720234
Unknown or Not Reported36636596366191212
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Mirikizumab 250mg Q4W/250mg Q8W250mg Mirikizumab /125mg Q8WPlacebo/250mg Mirikizumab300mg SecukinumabJapan GPP/EPTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native221207
Asian8166127019248
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander110103
Black or African American7728024
White3613729736501195
More than one race220206
Unknown or Not Reported010001
08

Study locations

178 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • David Stoll, M.D.
    Beverly Hills, California 90212, United States
  • California Dermatology and Clinical Research Institute
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • Tien Q. Nguyen, MD inc. DBA First OC Dermatology
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Dermatology Clinical Trials
    Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • San Luis Dermatology & Laser Clinic, Inc
    San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States
  • Clinical Science Institute
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
    Orange Park, Florida 32073, United States
  • Dermatologic Surgery Specialists, PC
    Macon, Georgia 31217, United States
  • Medaphase Inc
    Newnan, Georgia 30263, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
  • Treasure Valley Dermatology
    Boise, Idaho 83713, United States
  • University Dermatology
    Darien, Illinois 60561, United States
  • Arlington Dermatology
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center, PC
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • The South Bend Clinic
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Dermatology Specialist
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • DelRicht Research
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Dermatology and Skin Cancer Specialists
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Lawrence J Green, M.D, LLC
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • ORA, Inc
    Andover, Massachusetts 01810, United States
  • Central Dermatology PC
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine Dermatology Clinical Trials
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • PMG Research of Cary, LLC
    Cary, North Carolina 27511, United States
  • University of North Carolina Dermatology and Skin Cancer Cen
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516, United States
  • PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Bexley Dermatology Research
    Bexley, Ohio 43209, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Wright State Physicians Dermatology
    Fairborn, Ohio 46435, United States
  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Clinical Partners LLC
    Johnston, Rhode Island 02919, United States
  • Modern Research Associates PLLC
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
    San Antonio, Texas 78218, United States
  • Jordan Valley Dermatology Center
    West Jordan, Utah 84088, United States
  • Virginia Clinical Research
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Dermatology Associates
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • CEDIC-Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas
    Caba, Buenos Aires C1425DES, Argentina
  • Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME)
    Buenos Aires, C1027AAP, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires Skin
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1055AA0, Argentina
  • Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425BEA, Argentina
  • Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1425DKG, Argentina
  • Clinica Adventista de Belgrano
    Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, C1430EGF, Argentina
  • Halitus Instituto Médico
    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, C1122AAF, Argentina
  • Parra Dermatología
    Mendoza, 5500, Argentina
  • Woden Dermatology
    Phillip, Australian Capital Territory 2606, Australia
  • Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd
    Adelaide, South Australia 5073, Australia
  • Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc.
    Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
  • Fremantle Dermatology
    Perth, Western Australia 6160, Australia
  • Stratica Medical
    Edmonton, Alberta T5K 1X3, Canada
  • Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc.
    Surrey, British Columbia V3R 6A7, Canada
  • Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research Assoicates Ltd
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H1Z2, Canada
  • The Guenther Dermatology Research Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 3H7, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc
    Markham, Ontario L3P1X2, Canada
  • SKiN Centre for Dermatology
    Peterborough, Ontario K9J 5K2, Canada
  • K. Papp Clinical Research Inc
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research Inc
    Montreal, Quebec H2X 2V1, Canada
  • Clintrial, s.r.o.
    Praha 10, Hl. M. Praha 100 00, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady
    Praha 10, Hl. M. Praha 100 34, Czechia
  • Fakultni Nemocnice U svate Anny
    Brno, Jihomoravský Kraj 656 91, Czechia
  • Kozni ambulance Kutna Hora, s.r.o.
    Kutna Hora, Středočeský Kraj 28430, Czechia
  • Krajska zdravotni a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, o.z.
    Usti nad Labem, Ustecký Kraj 40113, Czechia
  • Kozni oddeleni
    Novy Jicin, 741 01, Czechia
  • CHU Dupuytren 2
    Limoges, Cedex 87042, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux Hopital Saint Andre
    Bordeaux Cedex, 33075, France
  • CH du Mans - Pavillon Claude Monet
    Le Mans Cedex 1, 72037, France
  • Cabinet Médical
    Martigues, 13500, France
  • Hopital Saint Eloi
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • CHU de Nice Hopital de L'Archet
    Nice cedex 3, 06202, France
  • Chu de Rouen Hopital Charles Nicolle
    Rouen cedex, 76036, France
  • Hopital Larrey
    Toulouse cedex 9, 31059, France
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg 69120, Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis Dr. Leitz und Kollegen
    Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg 70178, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
    Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg 72076, Germany
  • Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH
    Darmstadt, Hessen 64283, Germany
  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
    Frankfurt am Main, Hessen 60590, Germany
  • Dermatologisches Zentrum Osnabrück Nord
    Bramsche, Niedersachsen 49565, Germany
  • Elbe Kliniken Stade Buxtehude GmbH Klinikum Buxtehude
    Buxtehude, Niedersachsen 21614, Germany
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
    Bad Bentheim, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48455, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein 24105, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein 23538, Germany
  • Klin. Forschung Berlin-Mitte GmbH
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Rothhaar Studien GmbH
    Berlin, 10783, Germany
  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH
    Hamburg, 20537, Germany
  • Bacs-Kiskun Megyei Korhaz
    Kecskemet, Bacs-Kiskun 6000, Hungary
  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont Borgyogyaszati Klinika
    Debrecen, Hajdu-Bihar 4032, Hungary
  • Trial Pharma Kft.
    Puspokladany, Hajdu-Bihar 4150, Hungary
  • Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft
    Szolnok, Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok 5000, Hungary
  • UNO Medical Trials Kft.
    Budapest, 1135, Hungary
  • Ambrozia Kft.
    Budapest, 1238, Hungary
  • Oroshaza Varosi Onkormanyzat Korhaza
    Oroshaza, 5900, Hungary
  • MedMare Bt
    Veszprem, 8200, Hungary
  • Haemek Medical Center- Dermatology
    Afula, 1834111, Israel
  • Soroka Medical Center
    Beer Sheva, 8410101, Israel

Showing the first 100 of 178 sites across 16 countries.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 30, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 25, 2019
  • Study protocol · Apr 26, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03535194
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2018
Start date
Jun 26, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2020
Completion
Jun 3, 2020
Results posted
Mar 30, 2021
Last update
Mar 30, 2021

Study contacts

all 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
study director · Eli Lilly and Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion