ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03532360Updated Oct 8, 2026

Peanut and Tree Nut Desensitization

An interventional study of Oral immunotherapy in Peanut Allergy and Tree Nut Allergy, sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 8, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

this study evaluates whether tolerance to peanuts and tree nuts can be induced in patients through a process of oral immunotherapy. Participants will be randomized into groups receiving oral immunotherapy and a control group that will receive no intervention

Read the detailed description

The investigators are proposing to initiate a study assessing a common desensitization protocol for peanut/tree nut allergy. This study would enable the investigators to better determine the potential benefit of desensitization in individuals with peanut/tree nut allergy.

More specifically, the investigators will address the following research objectives:

Objectives A. To develop a protocols for peanut/tree nut desensitization with high (300mg) and low (30mg maintenance dose).

B. To determine the rate of desensitization to peanut/tree nut. C. To characterize predictors of successful desensitization. D. To characterize molecular mechanisms involved in the process of desensitization

These objectives will be evaluated through a randomized controlled trial

02

Conditions studied

  • Peanut Allergy
  • Tree Nut Allergy
03

In context

Peanut Hypersensitivity

166 studies on the registry are indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is close to the median of 50 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Peanut Hypersensitivity.

Browse Peanut Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 421 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients between 2 and 40 years of age who satisfy all the following criteria will be included:

  • A history suggestive of immediate allergy to peanut/tree nut . A convincing clinical history of an IgE mediated reaction to a specific food will be defined as a minimum of 2 mild signs/symptoms or 1 moderate or 1 severe sign/symptom that was likely IgE mediated and occurred within 120 minutes after ingestion or contact (or inhalation in the case of fish and shellfish). Reactions will be considered mild if they involve pruritus, urticaria, flushing, or rhinoconjunctivitis; moderate if they involve angioedema, throat tightness, gastrointestinal complaints, or breathing difficulties (other than wheeze); and severe if they involve wheeze, cyanosis, or circulatory collapse.(54-57)
  • The presence of at least one of the following confirmatory tests:

    • Positive SPT to peanut/tree nut or its proteins (weal diameter 3 mm larger than that of the normal saline control). The allergens used will be commercial extracts of peanut/tree nut (Omega Labs, Toronto, Ontario).
    • Detection of serum specific IgE (>0.35 kU/L) to peanut/tree nut or any of its proteins, measured by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (Phadia, CAP System, Uppsala, Sweden).
    • Positive oral challenge test to peanut/tree nut. Oral challenges will be performed with raw peanut/tree nut according to the recommendations of the position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (58).
  • form signed by the parents or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria.

  • Patients who are unstable from a respiratory point of view ..
  • Patients who present with intercurrent disease at the time of starting desensitization.
  • Non-IgE-mediated or non-immunological adverse reactions to nuts.
  • Malignant or immunopathological diseases and/or severe primary or secondary immune deficiencies.
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressor therapy
  • Patients receiving β-blockers (including topical formulations).
  • Associated diseases contraindicating the use of epinephrine: cardiovascular disease or severe hypertension.
  • Patients diagnosed with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Following randomization, this arm will receive no intervention. After twelve months, participants in this group will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

  • Active comparator
    Low-dose

    Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 30 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

    Other: Oral immunotherapy

  • Active comparator
    High-dose

    Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 300 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

    Other: Oral immunotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherOral immunotherapy

    Starting from a very low level and over a period of several months, participants receive escalating doses of the food to which they are allergic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of desensitization in peanut/tree nut allergic patients as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge

    Comparison of participants randomized to treatments arms who achieve peanut/tree nut desensitization compared to participants randomized to the control groups. This is measured by whether a participant is able to tolerate a total dose of 4172 mg crushed peanut or tree nut during an oral food challenge

    Time frame: 21 months

  2. Comparison of efficacy of 30 mg dose versus 300 mg dose in inducing desensitization to peanut or tree nut as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge

    Participants in the 30 mg arm will be compared to those in the 300 mg in terms of dose tolerated at post-immunotherapy blinded, placebo-controlled oral food challenge, as well as side effects experienced during immunotherapy

    Time frame: 21 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgE levels

    Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specific IgE before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

  2. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgA levels

    Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specific IgA before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

  3. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgG4 levels

    Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specific IgG4 before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

  4. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of mast cell activation as measured by CD63 expression

    Measurement of mast cell activation as measured by CD63 expression before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

  5. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of of DNA methylation levels

    Measurement of DNA methylation levels before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

  6. Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of Regulatory T cell levels

    Measurement of Regulatory T cell levels, before, during and after the desensitization process

    Time frame: 21 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Montreal Children's Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 87 months.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Peanut Hypersensitivity, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 66. This study's 87 months is above that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 8, 2026: primary completion Jun 2024 → Jun 2025 and completion Dec 2027 → Jun 2025.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2018
First posted
May 22, 2018
StartActual
Feb 19, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 6, 2025was Jun 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 6, 2025was Dec 2027
Last update
Oct 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 8, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2024→Jun 6, 2025
Oct 8, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2027→Jun 6, 2025 (actual)
Oct 8, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: The Hospital for Sick Children; collaborators removed: Julia Upton, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Jun 26, 2024→Jun 6, 2025
    Study completion Dec 31, 2027→Jun 6, 2025 (now actual)
    Sponsor Collaborators added: The Hospital for Sick Children; collaborators removed: Julia Upton, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto
    + 3 other changes: verification date, site details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03532360
Responsible party
Moshe Ben-Shoshan (Research Clinician, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2018
Start date
Feb 19, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2025
Completion
Jun 6, 2025
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion