ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03530254PGT-A&ERAUpdated May 4, 2022

Clinical Study of PGT-A Versus PGT-A+ERA

An interventional study of PGT-A and ERA Test in Infertility of Uterine Origin, sponsored by Igenomix. Terminated at 15 sites in 12 countries. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-04.

Sponsored by Igenomix (part of Vitrolife) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
Low recruitment speed, higher percentage drop-out and SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
368
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients who have shown previous implantation failures, despite transferring good quality and chromosomally normal embryos (diagnosed by PGT-A), could have a displaced Window of Implantation (WOI) and consequently, alterations in their endometrial receptivity. The correction of this displacement can improve the results of the Assisted Reproduction Treatments (ART).

The ERA test (Endometrial Receptivity Analysis) evaluates the transcriptomic endometrial profile to determine if the patient's uterus is receptive when the embryo is transferred during an In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) process, and identifies the personalized WOI of the patient. This process is called Personalized Embryo Transfer (pET).

The Preimplantation Genetic Test of Aneuploidies or PGT-A (Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy), is currently carried out using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and serves to identify chromosomally normal embryos prior to their transfer in an IVF treatment. Aneuploidies are rarely compatible with life or can cause congenital diseases. So, the identification of chromosomally normal embryos, improves the success of reproduction in cases in which infertility is caused by such aneuploidies.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine, in a randomized and prospective way, the clinical benefit of adding the ERA test to the embryonic aneuploidies test for patients with a PGT-A indication.

Read the detailed description

The lack of receptivity of the uterus and chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo are the two main causes of implantation failure. Patients with implantation failure, should consider the PGT-A test to identify and select euploid embryos. In addition, it should be evaluated the endometrium receptivity state at the time of Embryo Transfer (ET).

The PGT-A is an important genetic test that was developed to select embryos during IVF treatment and avoid embryonic chromosomal abnormalities that lead to miscarriage or life born with chromosomal diseases. Embryonic aneuploidy is linked to maternal age. The most common consequences are implantation failure, miscarriage or life born with multiple congenital anomalies. The transfer of euploid embryos (chromosomally normal) diagnosed by PGT-A has shown an increase in implantation rates.

Morphology is the most traditional and routine method of embryo selection being used. However, it is difficult to distinguish normal and abnormal embryos by observing their morphology under a microscope. Therefore, morphological analysis should not be the only technique used to decide which embryo should be transferred. Application of NGS in PGT-A cycles demonstrates that this methodology is reliable, allowing identification and transfer of euploid embryos resulting in ongoing pregnancies. However, despite the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos, it is not always possible to acquire optimal results in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART).

On the other hand, the endometrial gene expression profile allows the diagnosis of the endometrium receptivity status. This is carried out by a molecular tool developed and patented by Igenomix (PCT/ES2009/00386). The ERA test is a customized expression microarray that identifies the transcriptomic expression profile signature of the personalized Window of Implantation (pWOI). A bioinformatic predictor determines the moment of maximum receptivity, indicating the best time to perform a pET.

If the result of the ERA test is "Receptive", the WOI and the moment of taking the biopsy overlap. Nevertheless, if the result is "Pre-Receptive", the optimal implantation window is expected to be after the moment in which the biopsy is taken, and if the diagnosis is "Post-Receptive", the optimal window of implantation is prior to the biopsy. In a subsequent cycle, a pET will be performed according to the ERA test results.

Recently, it has been conducted a pilot study in patients with previous implantation failures with PGT-A and euploid embryo transfer (ET). The results of the ERA test have shown that a high percentage of these patients have been diagnosed as Non-receptive (90%). This percentage is higher than the expected in the normal population (12-20%) or in the Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF) patients without PGT-A (25-30%). Once the pET was performed according to the results of the ERA test, the gestation rate was 55.55%.

So, the objective of the present study is to validate these preliminary results in a prospective, multi-center, randomized and controlled study to demonstrate the value of the endometrial factor and the improvement of the results obtained in patients with PGT-A indication. If confirmed, it would be recommended the ERA test for all ART patients, not only for those with PGT-A, demonstrating the significance in searching for the pWOI to improve reproductive outcomes.

Considering a maximum drop-out rate of 30%, a total of 750 participants are expected to be included. According to the approved protocol, an interim analysis is planned at 50% of the total enrolment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility of Uterine Origin

Keywords

  • Endometrial receptivity
  • Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)
  • Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A)
  • Embryo Transfer (ET)
  • Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA)
  • Endometrial Diagnosis
  • Live Newborn Rate (LBR)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Igenomix is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

First submitted before Igenomix became part of Vitrolife.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Majority of age patients whose written informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee (EC) has been obtained, after having been duly informed of the nature of the study and voluntarily accepted to participate after being fully aware of the potential risks, benefits and any discomfort involved.
  • Patients who already have frozen euploid blastocysts (day 5/6 development) analysed by PGT-A.
  • Patients with embryos obtained from their own oocytes fertilized by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) or In vitro fertilization (IVF).
  • Patients with an expected embryo transfer of one or two embryos (Single ET or Double ET) in a HRT cycle.
  • Body Mass Index: 18,5-30 Kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of pathologies or malformations that affect the uterine cavity such as polyps, intramural myomas ≥ 4cm or submucosal, septum or hydrosalpinx during the patient's participation in the study. Patients suffering these pathologies before or after their inclusion in the study are allowed to participate if the pathology is corrected before performing any study procedure.
  • Any illness or medical condition that is unstable or which, according to medical criteria, may put at risk the patient's safety and her compliance in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
368 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    PGT-A without ERA

    Patients with PGT-A indication and ET in a Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT cycle) according to the usual clinical practice (day 5 of progesterone supplementation: P+5/120h).

    Diagnostic Test: PGT-A

  • Other
    PGT-A and test ERA

    Patients with PGT-A indication and pET in HRT cycle following the ERA test indication (when the WOI is confirmed as "Receptive").

    Diagnostic Test: PGT-A · Diagnostic Test: ERA Test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPGT-A

    PGT-A will be carried out following the usual clinical practice. Trophectoderm biopsy samples from blastocysts are analyzed by NGS to screen for numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

  • Diagnostic testERA Test

    The ERA test requires an endometrial biopsy and will determine if the endometrium is receptive or not by analysing the expression levels of 236 genes involved in endometrial receptivity, to assess the optimal time to place an embryo into the uterus and promote a successful implantation and pregnancy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Live birth rate

    Number of babies born per embryo transfer

    Time frame: 40 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implantation rate

    Number of implanted embryos per total number of embryos transferred

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Clinical pregnancy

    Number of clinical pregnancies per total number of pregnancies

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  3. Biochemical pregnancy

    Number of biochemical pregnancies per total number of pregnancies

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  4. Clinical miscarriages

    Number of clinical miscarriages per total number of pregnancies

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  5. Ectopic pregnancies

    Number of ectopic pregnancies per total number of pregnancies

    Time frame: 20 weeks

  6. Obstetric complications

    Type and number of obstetric complications during pregnancy

    Time frame: 40 weeks

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • Ovation Fertility Newport Beach
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Fertility Centers of New England
    Reading, Massachusetts 01867, United States
  • Pregna Medicina Reproductiva
    CABA, C1425, Argentina
  • Vida Bem Vinda
    São Paulo, 01332000, Brazil
  • Olive Fertility Center
    Vancouver, BC V5Z 3X7, Canada
  • Shady Grove Fertility Chile
    Vitacura, 6800, Chile
  • Georgian- American Center for Reproductive Medicine ReproART
    Tbilisi, 0179, Georgia
  • OASIS centre for reproductive medicine
    Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India
  • Mother And Child Hospital
    Defence Colony, National Capital Territory of Delhi 110024, India
  • NASCERE
    Mexico City, Mexico City 05120, Mexico
  • Milenium Centro Médico y de Bienestar de Alcobendas - Sanitas
    Alcobendas, Madrid 28108, Spain
  • Instituto Extremeño de Reproducción Asistida S.L. (IERA)
    Badajoz, 06006, Spain
  • Taiwan IVF Group
    Zhubei, 302, Taiwan
  • Bahceci Group
    Istanbul, 07720, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Vinmec Time City International Hospital
    Hà Nội, Vietnam
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 44 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 8, 2018
First posted
May 21, 2018
StartActual
May 28, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 22, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 22, 2022
Last update
May 4, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03530254
Lead sponsor
Igenomix
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2018
Start date
May 28, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2022
Completion
Feb 22, 2022
Last update
May 4, 2022

Study contacts

Carlos Simón, MD PhD
study chair · Igenomix

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion