An observational study in Satisfaction, Personal and Anesthesia, sponsored by University Hospital, Angers. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-17.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Angers · Observational
Pre-anesthesia visit for scheduled surgery is mandatory by law in France. During this visit, patients should be informed of the different available technics of anesthesia (i.e. general or loco-regional) and of their own risks .
Nowadays, many informations are given through written paper and leaflets, just before the consultation. In addition, patients need usually to wait for the doctor. This time may be used to give information, and new information's support, such as videos, may be used.
The aim of this study is to evaluated if a robot (PEPPER), who is able to answer to patients and to give informations, may increase the satisfaction of patients having a pre anesthesia visit for a scheduled surgery.
Before- after observational study.
All adult patients (age≥18 yrs) coming for a pre-anesthesia visit will be proposed to fulfill a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction and the quality of information they received.
University Hospital, Angers is the lead sponsor of 464 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All adult patients scheduled for a pre-Anesthesia visit during the study period (for orthopedic, general, urologic, ophthalmologic surgeries or for endoscopic examination under anesthesia).
Exclusion Criteria:
Conventionnel written information
Written information + presence of a robot (PEPPER) in the waiting room, who will give informations.
Other: PEPPER robot
Presence of a Robot (PEPPER Robot), designed and programmed to give informations, using a screen and vocal. All the patients in the second period will have access to,the robot, while waiting for the visit.
Patients satisfaction about the pre-anesthesia visit
numerical scale from 0 to 10 (poor to excellent)
Time frame: 1 hour
quality of information
numerical scale from 0 to 10 (poor to excellent)
Time frame: 1 hour
quality of information about risks
numerical scale from 0 to 10 (poor to excellent)
Time frame: 1 hour
annoying of waiting
numerical scale from 0 to 10 (none to maximal)
Time frame: 1 hour
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Angers