ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03512639HOMUpdated May 7, 2018

Arnica Montana and Bellis Perennis for Prevention of Seroma After Mastectomy

An interventional study of Homeopathic Medication and Placebo in Seroma, sponsored by Shaare Zedek Medical Center. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-07.

Sponsored by Shaare Zedek Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Apr 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Arnica montana and Bellis perennis for Prevention of Seroma Following Mastectomy.

Read the detailed description

Background Seroma is a common surgical complication created by the inflammatory process that follows mastectomy and reconstruction. It is, thus, common practice to insert surgical drains, which often often remain in place for long periods and delay recovery. In light of the many advantages of holistic treatment, there has been a global trend of integrating them with conventional medicine. In this study, the investigators examined the effect of Arnica montana and Bellis perennis on seroma prevention after mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

Study design The investigators conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study to asses the effect of homeopathic remedies on seroma in 55 patients (78 breasts), who had undergone mastectomy for cancer or risk reduction, followed by immediate implant and Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)-based breast reconstruction in the Department of Plastic \& Reconstructive Surgery at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel, between January 2016 and August 2017 (Figure 1). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and it was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov register.

Subjects All subjects were female, aged over 18 years, who underwent mastectomy, either for breast cancer or for risk reduction, followed by immediate breast reconstruction. In some patients, this was performed in a single procedure - direct to implant (DTI) (n=42); in others, it was in two stages tissue expander (TE) (n=36), depending on presurgical evaluation, risk factors and clinical assessment of perfusion of the mastectomy skin flaps. All subjects signed informed consent forms after receiving a detailed explanation of the study from one of its investigators.

The investigators excluded patients with: (a) conditions which could affect wound-healing; (b) coagulation problems (autoimmune and hematological diseases, etc.); (c) taking medication which affects the immunological or hematological system (steroids, anticoagulants, chemotherapeutic agents, etc.); and (d) with unbalanced background diseases. Active smokers were instructed to stop smoking at least three weeks prior to surgery and a month postoperatively.

Study medication and randomization and surgical techniques Experimental medications and placebos were prepared and delivered in accordance with the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS). Stem tinctures of Arnica montana, Bellis perennis and 40% alcohol as placebo were diluted 1:100 with 40% alcohol, and vigorously shaken. This process was repeated 30 times for a theoretical final concentration of 10-60 of the stem solutions. Spherical saccharose globules, approximately 1 mm in diameter, were wetted with the diluted tinctures and dried, resulting in three groups of the experimental medication: Arnica montana C30 (10-60), Bellis perennis C30 (10-60) and alcohol dilutions as placebo. The medications were packed in bottles, each containing 5 grams of the preparation, and consecutively numbered. The prefix 'A' indicated Arnica montana, and 'B' Bellis perennis .

Participants were randomly allocated into groups given either homeopathic medication (Arnica montana C30 and Bellis perennis C30) or placebo (alcohol 40% and alcohol 40%) in a 1:1 ratio. Age, body mass index, laterality of mastectomy, mastectomy type and number requiring sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection were similar between groups. The randomization sequence was created by an independent physician, uninvolved in the study, using computer-generated random numbers. The randomization code was held in confidence and the code was not broken until the data analysis. The same randomization list was used to blind the Arnica montana and the Bellis perennis, creating similar pairs. The placebos and the active medication were indistinguishable in appearance, taste and smell. Three globules of each medication were regarded as a single dose, to be sucked rather than swallowed.

Patients were hospitalized the night prior to surgery. On admission, a member of the study team again explained the study protocol, and gave the assigned medications to the patients. Patients were asked to take the medication according to the following protocol (Figure 2):

  1. One dose of A (3 pills) on the morning of surgery.
  2. One dose of A and one of B, 4 to 6 times a day for the first 24 hours after surgery (as soon as patients were stable, conscious and nausea- and vomit-free).
  3. One dose of A and one of B, 3 times a day until 4 days after surgery.
  4. Finally, one dose of B 3 times a day until removal of the surgical drain. All mastectomies were performed by experienced breast surgeons at our institution. Amputated breast-weight was documented. Sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) was carried out according to the oncological status of each patient, either through a separate axillary incision or through the mastectomy incision. All reconstructions were subpectoral ADM-assisted, performed by plastic surgeons from our department. 42 breasts underwent the DTI procedure, and in 36 breasts a two-stage TE approach was taken, according to the patient's estimated breast volume, risk factors and intraoperative clinical evaluation of flap perfusion. ADM used was an 8*16 cm ADM. A 10-mm Jackson-Pratt drain was inserted through a subcutaneous tunnel in the lateral breast gutter at the level of the inframammary fold (IMF) (in the subcutaneous space). When axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed through a separate incision, a second drain was placed in the axillary space. Drains were removed when drainage fell below 30 mL/24 hours.

Assessment

The following data for all patients were retrieved from their medical records:

  • Baseline characteristics and demographic variables
  • Medical history and risk factors - comorbidities, obesity, smoking, breast cancer (BRCA) mutation status
  • Variables relating to the procedure - reason for surgery (breast cancer vs. risk reduction), breasts operated (unilateral or bilateral), size and type of implant (DTI vs. TE and implant volume) and lymph node status (no biopsy taken/sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)/ALND)
  • Postoperative course- time to drain removal, hemoglobin and cortisol levels on postoperative days (POD) 3 and 7, postoperative level of pain according to the visual analog (VAS) scale and Quality of Recovery. The VAS scale is a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain at all" and 10 being "worst pain imaginable." The staff nurse caring for each patient administered the form and elicited the patient response for pain level according to the study protocol, and the quantity of narcotics taken. On POD 3 and 7, patients were given the Quality Of Recovery (QoR) 40 questionnaire, a validated questionnaire to measure postsurgical quality of recovery. Its scores range from 40 for very poor recovery to 200 for outstanding quality of recovery [49-51].
  • Postoperative complications: hematoma, skin-flap necrosis, infection, seroma, explantation and need for repeat surgery. Complications were divided into major and minor. Major complications included any of those mentioned above which required revision surgery in the operating room. Minor complications resolved spontaneously or were treated at the bedside.

Data analysis All data were collected daily by a study coordinator. The investigators calculated the mean standard deviation (SD) and range for all quantitative variables, as well as their absolute frequencies and percentages. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software. The criterion for significance was: alpha (α) = .05 (one-sided).

02

Conditions studied

  • Seroma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mastectomy, Breast Reconstruction, Homeopathic Treatment
03

In context

Seroma

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Seroma; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 100 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Seroma.

Browse Seroma studies →

Lead sponsor

Shaare Zedek Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 195 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients, aged over 18 years.
  • Patients underwent mastectomy, either for breast cancer or for risk reduction, followed by immediate breast reconstruction.
  • All subjects signed forms. -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions which could affect wound-healing
  • Coagulation problems ( and hematological diseases, etc.)
  • Medication which affects the immunological or hematological system (, anticoagulants, chemotherapeutic agents, etc.)
  • Unbalanced background diseases.
  • Active smokers were instructed to stop smoking at least three weeks prior to surgery and a month postoperatively.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Study

    Patients in the study group were given homeopathic medication (Arnica montana C30 and Bellis perennis C30) .

    Drug: Homeopathic Medication

  • Placebo comparator
    control

    Patients in the control group were given placebo medication. The placebos and the active medication were indistinguishable in appearance, taste and smell

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugHomeopathic Medication

    Homeopathic medication (Arnica montana and the Bellis perennis) were given to women in the study group following mastectomy and reconstruction to reduce post operative seroma

    Also known as: Arnica montana and the Bellis perennis

  • DrugPlacebo

    placebo was given to women in the control group following mastectomy and reconstruction to reduce post operative seroma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of post operative seroma following mastectomy and reconstruction.

    Evaluate the effect of Arnica montana and Bellis perennis on seroma formation, measured in number of days to surgical drain removal, in patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction.

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Aug 2017, 19 months.

Of 43 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Seroma, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 65. This study's 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 65.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2018
First posted
May 1, 2018
StartActual
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2017
CompletionActual
Apr 1, 2018
Last update
May 7, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03512639
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2017
Completion
Apr 1, 2018
Last update
May 7, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion