ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03499795Updated Jul 14, 2023Results posted

VGX-3100 Delivered Intramuscularly (IM) Followed by Electroporation (EP) for the Treatment of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Related Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal, High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) in Individuals Seronegative for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1/2

A Phase 2 interventional study of VGX-3100 and CELLECTRA™ 5PSP in Anal Neoplasm, sponsored by Inovio Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-14.

Sponsored by Inovio Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 162 studies in Anus Neoplasms with a site in United States — 28 open to participants now, 42 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Anus Neoplasms · United States.

Enrollment
98th of 128
23 · median 49
Started
2018
with 7 others
Phase 2
37 of 162
7 open now
Registered
93rd of 162
by date

Among the 162 studies in Anus Neoplasms with a site in United States, this one is the 98th largest by enrollment of the 128 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2018, is one of 37 in phase 2, and was the 93rd registered.

Anus Neoplasms

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Anus Neoplasms; 74 are open to participants now.

Browse Anus Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

28 of the 162 studies in Anus Neoplasms with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

23 more — sign in →

All 28 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 57 Anus Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 46 (81%) set no upper age limit and 7 (12%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 6 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 162 studies in Anus Neoplasms with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a phase 2, open-label efficacy study of VGX-3100 administered by intramuscular (IM) injection followed by electroporation (EP) in adult men and women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative with histologically confirmed anal or anal/peri-anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) associated with human papilloma virus (HPV)-16 and/or HPV-18. Approximately 24 participants will receive at least 3 doses of VGX-3100.

03

Conditions studied

  • Anal Neoplasm

Keywords

  • High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)
  • Human papillomavirus (HPV)
  • HPV-16
  • HPV-18
  • Anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (AIN2)
  • Anal intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (AIN3)
  • Peri-anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (PAIN2)
  • Peri-anal intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (PAIN3)
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Negative screening test for -1/2 within 30 days of Dose 1;
  • Confirmed anal or anal/peri-anal HPV-16/18 infection at Screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from HSIL specimen;
  • Anal tissue specimen/slides for diagnosis must be collected within 10 weeks of first dose of VGX-3100;
  • At least one anal or anal/peri-anal (AIN2/3 and/or PAIN2/PAIN3) lesion that is -confirmed as HSIL at Screening;
  • Appropriate candidate for histology collection procedures (i.e. excision or ) as judged by the Investigator;
  • Female subjects must be , surgically sterile or agree to avoid pregnancy by continued abstinence or use of a method with failure rate of less than 1% per year from Screening to one month after last dose of study medication (Week 12 or Week 40)
  • Men who could father a child must agree to use at least one form of birth control during or continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse prior to the study, for the duration of study participation and one month after last dose of study medication.
  • Normal Screening (ECG).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated micro invasive or invasive cancer;
  • -proven Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VAIN) and not undergoing medical care and/or treatment for VAIN;
  • Biopsy-proven Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VIN) and not undergoing medical care and/or treatment for VIN;
  • Biopsy-proven Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 and not undergoing medical care and/or treatment for CIN;
  • Biopsy-proven Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) and not undergoing medical care and/or treatment for PIN;
  • Anal or anal/peri-anal HSIL that is not accessible for sampling by biopsy instrument;
  • Intra-anal and/or peri-anal lesion(s) that cannot be fully visualized at Screening;
  • Inability to have complete and satisfactory high resolution anoscopic exams (HRAs)
  • Any treatment for anal or anal/peri-anal HSIL (e.g. surgery) within 4 weeks of Screening;
  • Pregnant, breast feeding or considering becoming pregnant within one month following the last dose of study medication;
  • Presence of any abnormal clinical laboratory values greater than Grade 1 per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events () version 4.03 within 45 days prior to Day 0 or less than Grade 1 but deemed by the Investigator;
  • as a result of underlying illness or treatment;
  • History of previous therapeutic HPV vaccination;
  • Receipt of any non-study related non- within 2 weeks of any VGX-3100 dose;
  • Receipt of any non-study related live vaccine (e.g. measles vaccine) within 4 weeks of any VGX-3100 dose;
  • Significant acute or chronic medical illness that could be negatively impacted by the electroporation treated as deemed by the Investigator;
  • Current or history of clinically significant, medically unstable disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject, interfere with study assessments or endpoint evaluation, or otherwise impact the validity of the study results;
  • Prior major surgery within 4 weeks of Day 0;
  • Participation in an interventional study with an compound or device within 4 weeks of signing the ICF;
  • Any illness or condition that in the opinion of the Investigator may affect the safety of the subject or the evaluation of any study endpoint.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VGX-3100

    Adult participants who were HIV negative with histologically confirmed anal or anal/peri-anal HSIL associated with HPV-16 and/or 18, received four 6 mg doses of VGX-3100 as an IM injection on Day 0, Week 4, Week 12, and Week 40 followed immediately by EP using the CELLECTRA™ 5PSP device.

    Biological: VGX-3100 · Device: CELLECTRA™ 5PSP

Interventions

  • BiologicalVGX-3100

    One milliliter (1 mL) VGX-3100 (deoxyribonucleic acid \[DNA\] plasmids encoding E6 and E7 proteins of HPV types 16 and 18) will be injected IM and delivered by EP using CELLECTRA™ 5PSP on Day 0, Week 4 and Week 12, and potentially Week 40.

  • DeviceCELLECTRA™ 5PSP

    IM injection of VGX-3100 is followed by EP with the CELLECTRA™ 5PSP device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL and no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With at Least One Local and Systemic Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During 7 Days Following Each Dose

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can include any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: 7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to 7), Week 4 (Days 22 to 28), Week 12 (Days 78 to 84), and Week 40 (Days 274 to 280)

  2. Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can include any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    Time frame: From first injection up to Week 88

  3. Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

  4. Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Tissue by Type-Specific HPV Testing at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

  5. Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal Swab by Specific HPV Testing at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

  6. Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) or HSIL at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

  7. Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL to Carcinoma From Baseline to Week 36

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 36

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Lesions as Determined by the Investigator at Weeks 36, 64, and 88

    Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 36, 64, and 88

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Frequency of HPV-16/17 E6/E7-specific CD8+/CD137+ Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) That Were Perforin Positive at Week 15

    PBMCs were isolated from whole blood samples. The assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application Flow Cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay. The Lytic Granule Loading assay examined cluster of differentiation (CD)8/CD137 cellular markers and Perforin (proteins involved in lytic degranulation and cytotoxic potential) intracellular marker. The frequency was presented as number of perforin-positive CD8 i.e., CD8+/ CD137+ PBMCs cells per million CD8+/ CD137+ PBMCs cells.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 15

  10. Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL or no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36

    Time frame: Week 36

Other outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in the Size of Peri-Anal Lesions as Determined by the Investigator at Weeks 36, 64, and 88

    Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 36, 64, and 88

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2023

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at study sites in Canada and the United States from 15 May 2018 to 16 June 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVGX-3100
Started23
Safety population23
Modified intent-to-treat (mitt) population23
Completed21
Not completed2
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL and no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL and no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL and no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 369.1 (1.6 to 25.9)
Statistical analysis
  • VGX-3100 · Clopper-Pearson · p = 0.8633P-value was calculated based on the exact method of Clopper-Pearson and superiority was concluded if the one-sided p-value is \<0.05.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Local and Systemic Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During 7 Days Following Each Dose

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can include any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
7 days following each dose: Day 0 (Days 0 to 7), Week 4 (Days 22 to 28), Week 12 (Days 78 to 84), and Week 40 (Days 274 to 280)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Local and Systemic Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During 7 Days Following Each Dose
ParticipantsVGX-3100
Number of Participants With at Least One Local and Systemic Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During 7 Days Following Each Dose21
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can include any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Time frame:
From first injection up to Week 88
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
ParticipantsVGX-3100
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE)23
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL at Week 3613.6 (2.9 to 34.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Tissue by Type-Specific HPV Testing at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Tissue by Type-Specific HPV Testing at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Tissue by Type-Specific HPV Testing at Week 3645.5 (24.4 to 67.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal Swab by Specific HPV Testing at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal Swab by Specific HPV Testing at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of HPV-16/18 From Intra-Anal Swab by Specific HPV Testing at Week 3631.8 (13.9 to 54.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) or HSIL at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) or HSIL at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) or HSIL at Week 369.1 (1.1 to 29.2)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Progression of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL to Carcinoma From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame:
From Baseline to Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL to Carcinoma From Baseline to Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL to Carcinoma From Baseline to Week 36100 (84.6 to 100)
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in the Number of Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Lesions as Determined by the Investigator at Weeks 36, 64, and 88
Time frame:
From Baseline to Weeks 36, 64, and 88
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Intra-Anal and/or Peri-Anal Lesions as Determined by the Investigator at Weeks 36, 64, and 88
percent changeVGX-3100
Percent Change From Baseline at Week 36-14.2 ± 41.93
Percent Change From Baseline at Week 64-3.3 ± 37.91
Percent Change From Baseline at Week 88-40.6 ± 46.77
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Frequency of HPV-16/17 E6/E7-specific CD8+/CD137+ Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) That Were Perforin Positive at Week 15

PBMCs were isolated from whole blood samples. The assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application Flow Cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay. The Lytic Granule Loading assay examined cluster of differentiation (CD)8/CD137 cellular markers and Perforin (proteins involved in lytic degranulation and cytotoxic potential) intracellular marker. The frequency was presented as number of perforin-positive CD8 i.e., CD8+/ CD137+ PBMCs cells per million CD8+/ CD137+ PBMCs cells.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 15
Reported as:
Mean · cells/million T cells + PBMCs
Mean Change From Baseline in Frequency of HPV-16/17 E6/E7-specific CD8+/CD137+ Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) That Were Perforin Positive at Week 15
cells/million T cells + PBMCsVGX-3100
Mean Change From Baseline in Frequency of HPV-16/17 E6/E7-specific CD8+/CD137+ Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) That Were Perforin Positive at Week 154.491 ± 4.9686
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL or no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36
Time frame:
Week 36
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL or no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 36
percentage of participantsVGX-3100
Percentage of Participants With no Histologic Evidence of Anal or Anal/Peri-Anal HSIL or no Evidence of HPV-16/18 at Week 3650.0 (28.2 to 71.8)
Other pre-specifiedPercent Change From Baseline in the Size of Peri-Anal Lesions as Determined by the Investigator at Weeks 36, 64, and 88
Time frame:
From Baseline to Weeks 36, 64, and 88

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over From first injection up to Week 88. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
VGX-31000/23 (0%)1/23 (4.3%)23/23 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVGX-3100
Ankle FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/23
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent other events
EventVGX-3100
Injection site painGeneral disorders20/23
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders17/23
HeadacheNervous system disorders15/23
FatigueGeneral disorders14/23
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders10/23
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations8/23
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/23
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders7/23
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders6/23
ProctalgiaGastrointestinal disorders5/23

Baseline characteristics

mITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of VGX-3100+EP.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VGX-3100
Mean46 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VGX-3100
Female7
Male16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VGX-3100
Hispanic or Latino6
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)VGX-3100
Race — White16
Race — Other3
Race — Black or African American2
Race — Asian2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)VGX-3100
Canada4
United States19
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Howard Brown Health (HBH)-Sheridan
    Chicago, Illinois 60613, United States
  • Laser Surgery Care
    New York, New York 10011, United States
  • Clinique de Recherche en Sante
    Québec, Quebec G1S2L6, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 25 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2023, 3 years after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jun 2021.

Of 40 phase 2 interventional studies under Anus Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 105. This study's 25 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 9, 2018
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
StartActual
May 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 16, 2020
CompletionActual
May 26, 2021
Results delay requested
Jun 15, 2021
Results first posted
Jul 3, 2023
Last update
Jul 14, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03499795
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
May 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2020
Completion
May 26, 2021
Results posted
Jul 3, 2023
Last update
Jul 14, 2023

Study contacts

Jeffrey Skolnik, MD
study director · Inovio Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: VGX-3100

Start the discussion