ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03499119Updated May 28, 2024Results posted

AMG 334 20160172 Pediatric Migraine PK Study.

A Phase 1 interventional study of AMG 334 Dose 1 and AMG 334 Dose 2 in Migraine, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-28.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 37 studies testing erenumab in Migraine Disorders — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. erenumab · Migraine Disorders.

Enrollment
28th of 37
53 · median 261
Started
2018
with 1 other
Phase 1
7 of 37
none open now
Registered
13th of 37
by date
Lead sponsor
20 of 37
Amgen

Among the 37 studies testing erenumab in Migraine Disorders, this one is the 28th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 7 in phase 1, and was the 13th registered.

Migraine Disorders

1,657 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 339 are open to participants now.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 37 studies testing erenumab in Migraine Disorders are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

About erenumab

erenumab: first FDA approval 2018 (AIMOVIG), first EMA approval 2018. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 217 Migraine Disorders studies recruiting now, 66 (30%) set no upper age limit and 136 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 44 take children under 18; 37 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Years to 17 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 37 studies testing erenumab in Migraine Disorders, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

AMG 334 20160172 Pediatric Migraine PK Study.

Read the detailed description

An Open-label, Randomized, Multiple-dose Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of AMG 334 in Children and Adolescents With Migraine

03

Conditions studied

  • Migraine

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject's legally acceptable representative has provided and the subject has provided written assent based on local regulations and/or guidelines prior to any study-specific activities/procedures being initiated.
  • Male and female children and adolescents ≥ 6 and \<18 years of age upon entry into screening
  • Diagnosis of migraines, with or without aura, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 3rd Edition, 2013) for at least 12 months prior to the study screening
  • Frequency of migraine of ≥ 4 migraine days per month in each of the 3 months prior to the study screening period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving treatment in another device or drug study
  • History of migraine with brainstem aura or hemiplegic migraine headache
  • Medical history or other condition that compromises the ability of the subject or legally acceptable representative to give appropriate and/or assent
  • except non-melanoma skin cancers or cervical cancer in situ within the last 5 years.
  • Presence of any clinical condition that in opinion of the investigator might increased the risk of subjects participating in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Cohort 1

    Subjects with a body weight at Day 1 of less than weight threshold.

    Drug: AMG 334 Dose 1 · Drug: AMG 334 Dose 3

  • Other
    Cohort 2

    Subjects with a body weight at Day 1 of weight threshold or more.

    Drug: AMG 334 Dose 1 · Drug: AMG 334 Dose 2

Interventions

  • Subjects weighing less than weight threshold at Day 1 will be randomized to either Dose 1 or Dose 3. Subjects weighing weight threshold or more at Day 1 will be randomized to either Dose 1 or Dose 2

  • Subjects weighing weight threshold or more at Day 1 will be randomized to either Dose 1 or Dose 2.

  • Subjects weighing less than weight threshold at Day 1 will be randomized to either Dose 1 or Dose 3.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Erenumab

    Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

    Time frame: First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85

  2. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab

    Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

    Time frame: First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85

  3. Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Erenumab

    Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

    Time frame: First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85

  4. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 28 Days (AUC0-28day) of Erenumab

    Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

    Time frame: First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant. A TEAE was defined as an AE starting on or after first dose of investigational product. The event did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up

  6. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Measurements

    The following measurements were performed: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up

  7. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements

    Clinically significant changes in ECG was defined as incidence of abnormal ECG diagnosis based on 12-lead ECG including heart rate, QRS, QTc and PR intervals.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Safety Tests

    The clinical laboratory safety tests included: chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Neurological Assessments

    The neurological examinations were completed as per standard of care.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up

07

Results

Posted Mar 28, 2024

Participant flow

Of the 63 participants screened, 53 participants were enrolled at 9 centers in the United States between 04 May 2018 and 23 November 2021. Enrollment was staggered by age category with adolescents 12 to \< 18 years of age starting enrollment first, followed by children 6 to \< 12 years of age.

Initial Treatment Phase
Participant flow — Initial Treatment Phase
MilestoneCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Started49832
Completed39729
Not completed1013
Withdrew: Protocol specified criteria0001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0001
Withdrew: Decision by sponsor1011
Optional Extension Phase
Participant flow — Optional Extension Phase
MilestoneCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Started13527
Completed12521
Not completed0106
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0005
Withdrew: Protocol specified criteria0100

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Erenumab

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

Time frame:
First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Erenumab
daysCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
First Dose7.0 (2.9 to 7.2)7.0 (2.9 to 14.0)9.0 (2.9 to 15.0)7.0 (2.9 to 16.0)
Third Dose7.2 (7.0 to 8.0)10.0 (7.0 to 21.0)9.0 (6.0 to 26.0)7.2 (4.0 to 15.0)
PrimaryMaximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab

Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

Time frame:
First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab
μg/mLCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
First Dose7.92 ± 0.94713.3 ± 4.857.16 ± 1.7613.4 ± 4.53
Third Dose11.3 ± 3.1418.9 ± 7.2914.1 ± 5.5423.7 ± 8.83
PrimaryTrough Concentration (Ctrough) of Erenumab

Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

Time frame:
First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Erenumab
μg/mLCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
First Dose3.92 ± 0.6267.02 ± 2.854.23 ± 1.057.77 ± 2.79
Third Dose5.43 ± 0.86110.3 ± 5.479.81 ± 2.3714.9 ± 5.87
PrimaryArea Under the Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 28 Days (AUC0-28day) of Erenumab

Blood samples for PK testing were collected for the measurement of PK concentrations. Serum erenumab concentrations were determined using a validated assay. NCA was performed for erenumab PK parameter estimation.

Time frame:
First dose: Days 1 (pre-dose), 8, 15, and 29 (pre-dose); third dose: Days 57 (pre-dose), 64, 71, and 85
Reported as:
Median · day*μg/mL
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 28 Days (AUC0-28day) of Erenumab
day*μg/mLCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
First Dose175 (165 to 185)282 (65.8 to 357)151 (112 to 192)277 (175 to 551)
Third Dose243 (176 to 269)465 (336 to 667)329 (180 to 437)475 (259 to 1000)
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant. A TEAE was defined as an AE starting on or after first dose of investigational product. The event did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)26628
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Measurements

The following measurements were performed: systolic/diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Measurements
ParticipantsCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Measurements0000
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements

Clinically significant changes in ECG was defined as incidence of abnormal ECG diagnosis based on 12-lead ECG including heart rate, QRS, QTc and PR intervals.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements
ParticipantsCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements0000
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Safety Tests

The clinical laboratory safety tests included: chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Safety Tests
ParticipantsCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Safety Tests0000
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Neurological Assessments

The neurological examinations were completed as per standard of care.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Neurological Assessments
ParticipantsCohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Neurological Assessments0000

Adverse events

Collected over Initial treatment phase: up to Week 12 + 16-week safety follow-up; optional extension phase: Week 12 to Week 52 + 16-week safety follow-up. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Initial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mg0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)2/4 (50%)
Initial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mg0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)6/9 (66.7%)
Initial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mg0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)6/8 (75%)
Initial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg0/32 (0%)1/32 (3.1%)19/32 (59.4%)
Optional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mg0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Optional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mg0/3 (0%)1/3 (33.3%)2/3 (66.7%)
Optional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mg0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)4/5 (80%)
Optional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg0/27 (0%)1/27 (3.7%)19/27 (70.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/40/90/80/320/11/30/50/27
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders0/40/91/80/320/10/30/50/27
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/40/90/80/320/10/30/51/27
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/40/90/81/320/10/30/50/27
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 55
Most frequent other events
EventInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgInitial Treatment Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgOptional Extension Phase Cohort 2: Erenumab 140 mg
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/41/91/82/320/10/32/54/27
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/40/90/82/320/10/32/57/27
HordeolumInfections and infestations0/40/90/80/320/11/30/50/27
Skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/40/90/80/320/11/30/50/27
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/40/90/82/320/10/30/53/27
Injection site painGeneral disorders1/41/91/80/320/10/30/50/27
Injection site swellingGeneral disorders1/40/90/80/320/10/30/51/27
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/41/90/80/320/10/30/51/27
Pharyngitis streptococcalInfections and infestations1/40/90/80/320/10/30/52/27
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/42/90/81/320/10/31/50/27

Baseline characteristics

The full analysis set included all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgTotal
Mean10.8 ± 1.710.4 ± 1.014.6 ± 1.315.4 ± 1.514.1 ± 2.5
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgTotal
Children (6 to < 12 years)370010
Adolescents (12 to < 18 years)1283243
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgTotal
Female1342331
Male364922
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino11024
Not Hispanic or Latino3883049
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort 1: Erenumab 35 mgCohort 1: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 70 mgCohort 2: Erenumab 140 mgTotal
Black (or African American)02147
Multiple00022
White4672643
Other01001
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Arkansas Childrens Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • CarePoint
    Englewood, Colorado 80112, United States
  • New England Institute for Clinical Research
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • Synergy Health
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Premiere Research Institute
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
  • PANDA Neurology and Atlanta Headache Specialists
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Riley Hosptial
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute Inc
    Plymouth, Minnesota 55441, United States
  • Childrens Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research
    Hastings, Nebraska 68901, United States
  • Dent Neurosciences Research Center
    Amherst, New York 14226, United States
  • State University of New York Upstate Medical University
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Nationwide Childrens Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hershey AD, Paiva da Silva Lima G, Pannacciulli N, Mackowski M, Koukakis R, McVige JW. Pharmacokinetics and safety of erenumab in pediatric patients with migraine: A phase I, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose study. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar;17(3):e13755. doi: 10.1111/cts.13755. PubMed 38476099 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.amgen.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 42 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2024, 2 years 4 months after primary completion.

Of 39 industry-sponsored phase 1 interventional studies under Migraine Disorders, half reached primary completion within 4 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 12. This study's 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 53 studies reached it within 6 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 7, 2018
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
StartActual
May 4, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 23, 2021
CompletionActual
Nov 23, 2021
Results first posted
Mar 28, 2024
Last update
May 28, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03499119
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
May 4, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 23, 2021
Completion
Nov 23, 2021
Results posted
Mar 28, 2024
Last update
May 28, 2024

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Erenumab

Start the discussion