An interventional study of Integrative and Role specific in Decisional Variability by Presentation Methods for Consensus, sponsored by ThinkWell. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-23.
Sponsored by ThinkWell · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The Protocol Lab for Online Trials-Delphi (PLOT-D) module will use an online three-round Delphi combined with Participatory action research to inform the development of a multi-use protocol template to use in writing protocols for self-recruited online trials of interventional self-management. The Delphi will include an embedded randomized controlled trial to test how and if stakeholders adapt their views based on the contributions of others inside or outside the groups with which they are familiar.
The research aims to provide support for citizens to work alongside researchers to build participatory health trials online (any randomized trial that uses the internet for a health or wellness intervention). Tools to develop methods to run quality online trials protocols are needed. Also, help for adapting guidance to include the public and patients as partners in research for online trials is limited. The purpose of this work is to facilitate improved practice within protocol writing for participatory online trials.
Public and patient involvement (PPI), is one method used to conduct participatory research. PPI actively engages communities or individuals and moves beyond educating, engaging or doing interviews with research participants and does the research with them as partners. There is growing consensus that PPI is of value to researchers, industry, regulators, and members of the public.
There is an active discussion that is without substantial evidence for when the optimal time in the research process is to start PPI and whether patients and the public should join the research team, act as advisors, or have everyone contribute perspectives and work with their roles or peer groups.
The embedded study within the Delphi explores how working with stakeholder feedback in different ways may influence decision ranking as well choice similarities and differences
Exclusion Criteria:
Behavioral: Integrative
Behavioral: Role specific
Behavioral: Consecutive
Stakeholder groups: a-b
Stakeholder groups: a or b
Stakeholder groups: a=\> b
The top five disparities and similarities in ranking between interventions
Prioritization of method preferences as decided by participants
Time frame: Up to 20 weeks or study completion
Differences and similarities between stakeholder groups
Ranking differences between stakeholders randomized to different forms of information presentation
Time frame: Up to 20 weeks or study completion
Plan to share: Yes — Aggregated de-identified data will be available on request to principal investigator Amy Price dr.amyprice@gmail.com
Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
ThinkWell