ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02332837I-TICUpdated Mar 23, 2021

Interactive Tool for Informed Consent

An interventional study of Intervention A: Questionnaire accuracy and Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion in Informed Consent, sponsored by ThinkWell. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-23.

Sponsored by ThinkWell · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was withdrawn
Not funded
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Online trials require informed consent from participants. Massive online trials make face-to-face signed consent unrealistic and existing consent comprehension could be improved to increase participant safety and understanding.

This trial will compare understanding of traditional digital consent with multi-media consent and with consent that is multi-media and interactive and uses a test and train model.

The computer will assign participants to 1 of 3 methods to present online consent to participants

Read the detailed description

Online trials require informed consent from participants. Massive online trials make face-to-face signed consent unrealistic and existing consent comprehension could be improved to increase participant safety.

Without accurate knowledge decision-making is not informed. Informed consent for participation in research is part of this process. In online trials the opportunity for face-to-face signed consent with researchers is not an option.

Consent acts as a safeguard that full disclosure occurred. Adequate documentation is evidence against false reports of coercion.

Informed consent inclusive of signed participant information sheets provide a record between researcher and participant of the roles and agreements they share.

According to existing research, only 6% of consents and participant information sheets are written below an eighth grade level of comprehension; 54% of participants with an 8th grade level education partially understood the consent with figures rising to 72% for participants with greater than 8th grade educations, however no participant fully understood the consent materials. The deficits ranged from misunderstandings about risk, side effects, adverse effects reporting, a participants right to withdraw, confidentiality and even the purpose of the trial.

This trial will compare understanding of traditional digital consent with multi-media consent and with consent that is multi-media and interactive and uses a test and train model.

The computer will assign participants to 1 of 3 methods to present online consent to participants

02

Conditions studied

  • Informed Consent

Keywords

  • informed consent, public led trials, shared decision making,
03

In context

Lead sponsor

ThinkWell is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • pre-screened as eligible for a ThinkWell PLOT trial
  • 18 years of age
  • No personal email address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not pre-screened or eligible for an existing ThinkWell PLOT trial
  • people without internet access
  • People who cannot read
  • People without the ability to understand the website and documents
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Digital informed consent

    Traditional digitally signed text based informed consent Intervention A: questionnaire accuracy Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion Intervention C: Questionnaire completion rate

    Behavioral: Intervention A: Questionnaire accuracy · Behavioral: Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion · Behavioral: Intervention C: Questionnaire Completion rate

  • Experimental
    Multi-media informed consent

    Informed consent with images, text and auditory presentation Intervention A: questionnaire accuracy Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion Intervention C: Questionnaire completion rate

    Behavioral: Intervention A: Questionnaire accuracy · Behavioral: Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion · Behavioral: Intervention C: Questionnaire Completion rate

  • Experimental
    Test to train informed consent

    Informed consent with images, text, auditory presentation and test to train feature where participants get feedback on comprehension responses throughout the consent and can change them Intervention A: questionnaire accuracy Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion Intervention C: Questionnaire completion rate

    Behavioral: Intervention A: Questionnaire accuracy · Behavioral: Intervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion · Behavioral: Intervention C: Questionnaire Completion rate

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntervention A: Questionnaire accuracy

    Participants will be tested by questionnaire to measure how well consent is understood

  • BehavioralIntervention B: Questionnaire speed of completion

    Time to complete questionnaire from time of presentation

  • BehavioralIntervention C: Questionnaire Completion rate

    Number of participants who complete the questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. level of consent comprehension

    assessed by accuracy on scored questionnaire

    Time frame: immediately following intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to complete consent

    Time between presentation of consent materials and signing of consent

    Time frame: immediately following intervention

  2. Compliance

    number of participants who complete consent questionnaire

    Time frame: immediately following intervention

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ryan RE, Prictor MJ, McLaughlin KJ, Hill SJ. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub2. PubMed 18254029 ↗
  • Gillies K, Huang W, Skea Z, Brehaut J, Cotton S. Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation. Trials. 2014 Feb 18;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-62. PubMed 24548781 ↗
  • Antoniou EE, Draper H, Reed K, Burls A, Southwood TR, Zeegers MP. An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):557-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041871. Epub 2011 Apr 8. PubMed 21478421 ↗
  • Rowbotham MC, Astin J, Greene K, Cummings SR. Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058603. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PubMed 23484041 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jul 2019; primary completion for Nov 2019, 4 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 4, 2015
First posted
Jan 7, 2015
StartEst.
Jul 2019
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2019
CompletionEst.
Jun 2020
Last update
Mar 23, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02332837
Lead sponsor
ThinkWell
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 7, 2015
Start date
Jul 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion