CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03495648Updated Nov 17, 2021Results posted

Tanglewood Trail Walking Program in Rural Kentucky 2017

An interventional study of walking group led by a community organizer in Dietary Habits, sponsored by Dawn Brewer. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-17.

Sponsored by Dawn Brewer · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
123
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Tanglewood Trail Walking Program is a well-established community health initiative that encourages community members to walk approximately 1 mile to the Whitesburg Farmers Market each Saturday. The study aims to determine if walking to the market with a community health coach results in healthier options being selected at the market.

Read the detailed description

In the summer of 2017, community members of Whitesburg, KY were recruited to join the Tanglewood Trail Walking Program to the Whitesburg farmers market. Each Saturday, participants reported whether or not they walked the 1-mile trail to the farmers market and they reported which fruits and vegetables they purchased. The Walking Program was held June - Sept 2017. Participants completed questionnaires about fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity. Participants also provided physical and biological measurements.

Although originally designed to compare data among walkers and non-walkers, the protocol was changed due to participant feasibility. Data were analyzed by comparing "low engagers" - those who walked to the market fewer than three times during the program - or "high engagers" - those who walked three or more times during the program. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months.

The data for years 2019 and 2020 of the Tanglewood to Trail walking program are registered separately in ClinicalTrials.gov.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dietary Habits

Keywords

  • farmers market
  • Appalachia
  • physical activity
  • fruit and vegetable voucher program
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ability to walk 1 kilometer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant
  • institutionalized adults
  • impaired consent ability
  • prisoners
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
123 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Walking Group (Low Engagers)

    Subjects will participate in a walking group led by a community organizer as a means to get to a local farmer's market. Low engagers are defined as those participants who walked to the market two or fewer times during the program.

    Behavioral: walking group led by a community organizer

  • Experimental
    Walking Group (High Engagers)

    Subjects will participate in a walking group led by a community organizer as a means to get to a local farmer's market. High engagers are defined as those participants who walked to the market three or more times during the program.

    Behavioral: walking group led by a community organizer

Interventions

  • Behavioralwalking group led by a community organizer

    Subjects will walk 1 kilometer from a pre-determined point to a local farmer's market.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Carotenoid Levels Over Time

    Subjects' carotenoid status will be measured using a carotenoid Raman Spectroscopy to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables increases intake in fruits and vegetables as measured by carotenoid status.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in A1c

    Subjects' A1c will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant A1c. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months and the difference will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  2. Change in LDL Cholesterol

    Subjects' LDL will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant LDL.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  3. Change in HDL Cholesterol

    Subjects' HDL will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant HDL.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  4. Change in Total Cholesterol

    Subjects' total cholesterol will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant total cholesterol.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  5. Change in Weight

    Subjects' weight will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant weight.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  6. Change in Waist Circumference

    Subjects' waist circumference will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant waist circumference.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  7. Change in Self-reported Activity Level

    Subjects' self-reported activity level will be measured as self-reported days of leisure physical activity per week.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  8. Change in Self-reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake

    Subjects' self-reported total servings of fruit and vegetable intake per day.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  9. Group Cohesion

    Subjects' group cohesion was measured post-intervention using the Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire" (also known as PAGE-Q). There are 20 questions, ranked using a Likert Scale with 1 being "strongly disagree" and 9 "strongly agree." Scores range from 20-180; higher scores indicate more social cohesion.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Understanding of Plant-based Phytonutrients

    Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their understanding of the importance of ingesting plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Belief in the Benefit of Plant-based Nutrients

    Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their appreciation of plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Belief in the Preventative Effects of Plant-Based Nutrients

    Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their beliefs of plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Belief in the Role of Healthy Diet in Protecting Health From Pollutants

    Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their beliefs that a healthy diet might protect health from environmental pollutants. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of a healthy diet.

    Time frame: 3 months

  14. Knowledge of Which Foods Contain Phytonutrients

    Participants will be asked a question about which foods contain phytonutrients. Possible answers are meat, dairy, plant foods, all foods, or don't know. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that correctly identified plant foods.

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Knowledge of Environmental Pollutants

    Participants will be asked to identify environmental pollutants from a list. Possible answers are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, nitrites, all of those, none of those, or don't know. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that correctly identified all of those.

    Time frame: 3 months

06

Results

Posted Nov 17, 2021

Participant flow

123 participants were enrolled, but two participants dropped out of the study within the first month due to lack of interest.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Started6061
Completed6061
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Carotenoid Levels Over Time

Subjects' carotenoid status will be measured using a carotenoid Raman Spectroscopy to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables increases intake in fruits and vegetables as measured by carotenoid status.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in A1c

Subjects' A1c will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant A1c. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months and the difference will be calculated.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Change in A1c
percent changeWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in A1c-0.31 ± 0.53-0.20 ± 0.52
SecondaryChange in LDL Cholesterol

Subjects' LDL will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant LDL.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in LDL Cholesterol
mg/dLWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in LDL Cholesterol-11.9 ± 23.8-12.7 ± 17.5
SecondaryChange in HDL Cholesterol

Subjects' HDL will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant HDL.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in HDL Cholesterol
mg/dLWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Males1.6 ± 4.38.8 ± 7.2
Females0.04 ± 8.55.3 ± 10.0
SecondaryChange in Total Cholesterol

Subjects' total cholesterol will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant total cholesterol.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Total Cholesterol
mg/dLWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in Total Cholesterol-14.8 ± 32.5-11.0 ± 24.2
SecondaryChange in Weight

Subjects' weight will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant weight.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · lb
Change in Weight
lbWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in Weight0.23 ± 5.4-1.4 ± 11.8
SecondaryChange in Waist Circumference

Subjects' waist circumference will be measured to determine if walking combined with a voucher for fruits and vegetables changes participant waist circumference.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · inches
Change in Waist Circumference
inchesWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Male-0.30 ± 1.3-0.34 ± 2.1
Female-0.33 ± 2.3-0.88 ± 3.8
SecondaryChange in Self-reported Activity Level

Subjects' self-reported activity level will be measured as self-reported days of leisure physical activity per week.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · days of physical activity per week
Change in Self-reported Activity Level
days of physical activity per weekWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in Self-reported Activity Level1.7 ± 2.61.4 ± 2.1
SecondaryChange in Self-reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake

Subjects' self-reported total servings of fruit and vegetable intake per day.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · servings of fruit and vegetables per day
Change in Self-reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake
servings of fruit and vegetables per dayWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Change in Self-reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake1.0 ± 4.22.4 ± 2.7
SecondaryGroup Cohesion

Subjects' group cohesion was measured post-intervention using the Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire" (also known as PAGE-Q). There are 20 questions, ranked using a Likert Scale with 1 being "strongly disagree" and 9 "strongly agree." Scores range from 20-180; higher scores indicate more social cohesion.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Group Cohesion
score on a scaleWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
Group Cohesion130.2 ± 53.1155.3 ± 40.7
SecondaryUnderstanding of Plant-based Phytonutrients

Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their understanding of the importance of ingesting plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Understanding of Plant-based Phytonutrients
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline1117
3 months1220
SecondaryBelief in the Benefit of Plant-based Nutrients

Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their appreciation of plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Belief in the Benefit of Plant-based Nutrients
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline712
3 months519
SecondaryBelief in the Preventative Effects of Plant-Based Nutrients

Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their beliefs of plant-based nutrients. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of plant-based nutrients.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Belief in the Preventative Effects of Plant-Based Nutrients
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline811
3 months1118
SecondaryBelief in the Role of Healthy Diet in Protecting Health From Pollutants

Participants will be asked a question demonstrating their beliefs that a healthy diet might protect health from environmental pollutants. Possible answers are yes, no, or not sure. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that understood the importance of a healthy diet.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Belief in the Role of Healthy Diet in Protecting Health From Pollutants
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline69
3 months915
SecondaryKnowledge of Which Foods Contain Phytonutrients

Participants will be asked a question about which foods contain phytonutrients. Possible answers are meat, dairy, plant foods, all foods, or don't know. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that correctly identified plant foods.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Knowledge of Which Foods Contain Phytonutrients
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline1717
3 months1327
SecondaryKnowledge of Environmental Pollutants

Participants will be asked to identify environmental pollutants from a list. Possible answers are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, nitrites, all of those, none of those, or don't know. Data will be presented as the number of participants in each group that correctly identified all of those.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Knowledge of Environmental Pollutants
ParticipantsWalking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)
baseline1322
3 months815

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were not collected during the course of this study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Walking Group (Low Engagers)———
Walking Group (High Engagers)———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Mean53.9 ± 14.746.7 ± 14.750.2 ± 15.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Female353772
Male252449
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino5858116
Unknown or Not Reported235
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White5759116
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
United States6061121
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Mean33.4 ± 7.333.4 ± 7.033.4 ± 7.1
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Mean80.6 ± 9.384.3 ± 10.882.5 ± 10.2
Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)Walking Group (Low Engagers)Walking Group (High Engagers)Total
Mean128.4 ± 15.7129.1 ± 18.0128.8 ± 16.9

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · May 16, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No current plan to share data.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03495648
Lead sponsor
Dawn Brewer
Collaborators
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Responsible party
Dawn Brewer (Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 12, 2018
Start date
May 30, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 24, 2020
Completion
Sep 24, 2020
Results posted
Nov 17, 2021
Last update
Nov 17, 2021

Study contacts

Dawn Brewer, PhD
principal investigator · University of Kentucky

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion