ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03493451Updated Oct 26, 2024Results posted

Study of BGB-A317 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mature T- and NK-cell Neoplasms

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tislelizumab in Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma, PTCL and Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, sponsored by BeiGene. Completed at 24 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-26.

Sponsored by BeiGene · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, open-label, Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BGB-A317 in participants with relapsed or refractory mature T- and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms. There were three cohorts:

  • Cohort 1: Relapsed or refractory (R/R) extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL; nasal or non-nasal type)
  • Cohort 2: Other R/R mature T-cell neoplasms, limited to the following histologies: peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL)
  • Cohort 3: R/R cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, limited to mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sèzary syndrome (SS)

Study procedures included a Screening phase (up to 35 days); Treatment phase (until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever occurs first); Safety Follow-up phase (up to 90 days following last study treatment for all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)); and Survival follow-up phase (duration varying by participant).

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma
  • PTCL
  • Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma
  • Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type
  • Extranodal NK T Cell Lymphoma
  • Extranodal NK T Cell Lymphoma, Nasal
  • Adult Nasal Type Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma
  • Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma
  • Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma Recurrent
  • Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma Refractory
  • Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma NOS
  • Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
  • Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Refractory
  • Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
  • Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Positive
  • Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-negative
  • ALK-negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
  • ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
  • Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma

Keywords

  • T/NK-cell
  • NK/T-cell
  • extranodal
  • nasal
  • NK-cell
  • ENKTL
  • peripheral T-cell
  • anaplastic large cell
  • ALCL
  • angioimmunoblastic
  • PTCL-NOS
  • Relapsed
  • Refractory
03

In context

Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral

607 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is above the median of 39 across 529 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral.

Browse Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral studies →

Lead sponsor

BeiGene is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (nasal or non-nasal type, peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, or Sezary syndrome)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic therapy
  • Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for participants in Cohort 1 and 2
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Adequate respiratory function
  • Adequate bone marrow function
  • Adequate renal and hepatic function

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Known central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma
  • Previously received immune checkpoint therapy
  • Prior malignancy within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 or lower prostate cancer
  • Active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse with some exceptions
  • Severe or debilitating pulmonary disease
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • Active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Known infection with HIV or active viral hepatitis B or C infection
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Vaccination with a live vaccine within 35 days prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Hypersensitivity to tislelizumab
  • Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1: ENKTL

    Participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) extranodal natural killer-/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL; nasal or non-nasal type) were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)

    Drug: Tislelizumab

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCL

    Participants with other R/R mature T-cell neoplasms \[limited to peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL)\] were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)

    Drug: Tislelizumab

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3: MF and SS

    Participants with R/R cutaneous T-cell lymphoma \[limited to mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sèzary syndrome (SS)\] were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)

    Drug: Tislelizumab

Interventions

  • Administered intravenously

    Also known as: BGB-A317

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response or partial response as determined by the investigator using Lugano criteria with Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria (LYRIC) modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) guidelines for cohort 3.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any reason for cohorts 1 and 2.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

  4. Complete Response Rate (CRR)

    CRR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response or complete metabolic response as best overall response as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

  5. Time to Response (TTR)

    Time to response defined as the time from first study drug administration to the time the response criteria (complete response or partial response) are first met as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

  6. Quality of Life Assessment: EQ-5D-5L Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Score

    Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EQ-5D-5L visual analogue score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' An increasing score indicates improvements from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)

  7. Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score

    Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes global health status and quality of life questions related to their overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)

  8. Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score

    Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes questions related to fatigue symptoms in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and vital signs

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

07

Results

Posted May 4, 2022

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled from study centers in Canada, China, France, Italy, and Taiwan, China.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Started224411
Completed000
Not completed224411
Withdrew: Death11263
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up141
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject112
Withdrew: Progressive disease100
Withdrew: Transferred to long term extension study8135

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response or partial response as determined by the investigator using Lugano criteria with Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria (LYRIC) modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) guidelines for cohort 3.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Percentage of participantsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Overall Response Rate (ORR)31.8 (13.9 to 54.9)20.5 (9.8 to 35.3)45.5 (16.7 to 76.6)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DOR)
MonthsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Duration of Response (DOR)NA (2.66 to NA)8.2 (2.50 to NA)11.3 (2.76 to 11.30)
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
MonthsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Progression-free Survival (PFS)2.7 (1.45 to 5.32)2.7 (2.56 to 4.76)16.8 (2.60 to 16.82)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any reason for cohorts 1 and 2.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCL
Overall Survival (OS)8.8 (3.25 to NA)13.3 (7.66 to 26.22)
SecondaryComplete Response Rate (CRR)

CRR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response or complete metabolic response as best overall response as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Percentage of participantsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Complete Response Rate (CRR)18.2 (5.2 to 40.3)9.1 (2.5 to 21.7)9.1 (0.2 to 41.3)
SecondaryTime to Response (TTR)

Time to response defined as the time from first study drug administration to the time the response criteria (complete response or partial response) are first met as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Response (TTR)
MonthsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Time to Response (TTR)5.75 (2.1 to 13.9)2.86 (2.1 to 5.5)6.83 (2.6 to 11.1)
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessment: EQ-5D-5L Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Score

Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EQ-5D-5L visual analogue score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' An increasing score indicates improvements from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessment: EQ-5D-5L Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Score
Score on a scaleCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Cycle 5, Day 14.42 ± 10.2731.11 ± 13.8840.25 ± 22.276
Cycle 9, Day 11.17 ± 4.9165.56 ± 21.279-0.83 ± 17.713
Cycle 13, Day 1-3.29 ± 16.65015.00 ± 19.6851.33 ± 21.398
Cycle 17, Day 10.17 ± 9.32610.00 ± 17.8893.67 ± 23.551
Cycle 21, Day 14.25 ± 10.9058.33 ± 22.5465.50 ± 18.285
Cycle 25, Day 14.00 ± 14.422-2.50 ± 10.6075.00 ± 7.071
Cycle 29, Day 1-2.67 ± 4.619-5.00 ± 7.071—
Cycle 33, Day 1-3.00 ± NA0.00 ± NA—
Safety Follow-up-1.50 ± 8.546-9.52 ± 21.04712.50 ± 3.536
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score

Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes global health status and quality of life questions related to their overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.

Time frame:
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score
Score on a scaleCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Cycle 5, Day 17.64 ± 24.2206.67 ± 19.04110.42 ± 24.296
Cycle 9, Day 18.33 ± 10.54112.04 ± 28.2941.39 ± 21.995
Cycle 13, Day 14.76 ± 11.644-1.67 ± 19.0032.78 ± 15.516
Cycle 17, Day 12.78 ± 12.5466.94 ± 30.0084.17 ± 21.570
Cycle 21, Day 112.50 ± 14.4340.00 ± 33.3330.00 ± 20.412
Cycle 25, Day 114.58 ± 25.797-8.33 ± 11.785-4.17 ± 5.893
Cycle 29, Day 116.67 ± 16.667-8.33 ± 11.785—
Cycle 33, Day 10.00 ± NA0.00 ± NA—
Safety Follow-up7.74 ± 27.045-14.93 ± 26.91720.83 ± 17.678
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score

Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes questions related to fatigue symptoms in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.

Time frame:
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score
Score on a scaleCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Cycle 5, Day 1-2.78 ± 14.3127.02 ± 14.9121.39 ± 41.335
Cycle 9, Day 10.00 ± 12.172-1.39 ± 11.011-22.22 ± 41.574
Cycle 13, Day 1-1.59 ± 11.878-6.67 ± 12.669-5.56 ± 18.257
Cycle 17, Day 19.26 ± 16.3551.85 ± 10.924-12.96 ± 16.355
Cycle 21, Day 10.00 ± 12.83011.11 ± 11.111-16.67 ± 14.344
Cycle 25, Day 10.00 ± 15.71327.78 ± 7.857-5.56 ± 7.857
Cycle 29, Day 13.70 ± 27.96222.22 ± 15.713—
Cycle 33, Day 111.11 ± NA33.33 ± NA—
Safety Follow-up-1.59 ± 19.9037.87 ± 30.820-44.44 ± 31.427
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and vital signs

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
ParticipantsCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
At least one TEAE224110
SAEs9215

Adverse events

Collected over Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: ENKTL11/22 (50%)9/22 (40.9%)21/22 (95.5%)
Cohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCL26/44 (59.1%)21/44 (47.7%)39/44 (88.6%)
Cohort 3: MF and SS3/11 (27.3%)5/11 (45.5%)10/11 (90.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 54
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/220/441/11
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/224/440/11
Cellulitis staphylococcalInfections and infestations0/220/441/11
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/224/440/11
Pneumonia cryptococcalInfections and infestations0/220/441/11
Staphylococcal sepsisInfections and infestations0/220/441/11
Varicella zoster virus infectionInfections and infestations0/220/441/11
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/220/441/11
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/221/441/11
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/221/441/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 149
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SS
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/224/444/11
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders2/223/444/11
PyrexiaGeneral disorders6/2213/444/11
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/227/440/11
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders1/225/443/11
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/220/443/11
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders0/221/443/11
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/227/443/11
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/226/443/11
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/222/443/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Cohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SSTotal
Mean51.5 ± 16.2455.8 ± 15.0359.4 ± 12.4555.1 ± 15.09
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SSTotal
Female815326
Male1429851
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SSTotal
Asian1923244
White218828
Not Reported1315
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Cohort 1: ENKTLCohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCLCohort 3: MF and SSTotal
Canada0022
China1922041
Taiwan0101
Italy218828
France1315
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency the Vancouver Centre
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Peking University Third Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100000, China
  • Beijing Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100730, China
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100730, China
  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China
  • Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
  • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    Harbin, Heilongjiang 150000, China
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
    Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, China
  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200000, China
  • Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200092, China
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality 300060, China
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, China
  • Institut Dhematologie de Basse Normandie Chu Caen Normandie
    Caen, 14033, France
  • Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
    PierreBenite, 69495, France
  • Asst Papa Giovanni Xxiii, Medicina Trasfusionale Ed Ematologia
    Bergamo, 24127, Italy
  • Policlinico Sorsola Malpighi, Aou Di Bologna
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Irccs Per L Oncologia, Divisione Ematologia Centro Trapianti Di Mid
    Genova, 16121, Italy
  • Ospedale San Raffaele
    Milan, 20132, Italy
  • Ospedale Maggiore, Ematologia E Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo (Ctmo), Aou Parma
    Parma, 43126, Italy
  • Aou Pisana, Stabilimento Di Santa Chiara
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S Maria Di Terni
    Terni, 05100, Italy
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 10048, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Huiqiang Huang, et al. Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) for relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: preliminary efficacy and safety results from a phase 2 study. Poster Abstract EP1268, European Hematology Association 2020.
  • Pier Luigi Zinzani, et al. Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) for relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas: Safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study. Poster Abstract EP1235, European Hematology Association 2020.
  • Bachy E, Savage KJ, Huang H, Kwong YL, Gritti G, Zhang Q, Liberati AM, Cao J, Yang H, Hao S, Hu J, Zhou K, Petrini M, Russo F, Zhang H, Sang W, Ji J, Ferreri AJM, Damaj GL, Liu H, Zhang W, Ke X, Ghiggi C, Huang S, Li X, Yao H, Paik J, Novotny W, Zhou W, Zhu H, Zinzani PL. Treating relapsed/refractory mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms with tislelizumab: a multicenter open-label phase 2 study. Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 22;7(16):4435-4447. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009575. PubMed 37276067 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 14, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 7, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03493451
Lead sponsor
BeiGene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Apr 13, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2021
Completion
Apr 21, 2021
Results posted
May 4, 2022
Last update
Oct 26, 2024

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · BeiGene

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tislelizumab

Start the discussion