ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03492138Updated May 29, 2020

Ixazomib, ONC201, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ONC201 and Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Ajai Chari. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-29.

Sponsored by Ajai Chari · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Low enrollment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2020, 6 years 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ONC201 is a novel dopamine receptor D2 antagonist that is able to activate the integrated stress response pathway. It is active against multiple myeloma cells in vitro, both as a single agent and in combination with corticosteroids and proteasome inhibitors. In order to document superiority over the combination compared to the individual agents of ixazomib and ONC201 in a single arm study, there will initially be a run-in period of weekly ONC201 625 mg with dexamethasone 40 mg such that if there is progression of disease (25% increase) after 4 weeks or less than a minimal response (25% reduction) after 8 weeks then ixazomib will be added. Dexamethasone is dose-reduced to 20 mg at the same schedule for subjects ≥ 75 years old. If patients do achieve single-agent responses with ONC201 (minimal response or better), they will continue with weekly ONC201 and dexamethasone until progression, with response assessments after each 28-day cycle. Patients who have previously been treated on another clinical trial with weekly ONC201 625mg with dexamethasone with progression while receiving treatment do not need to complete the run-in phase of the study.

At the time of progression, they will proceed to the 3 drug combination phase of the study. It is at the point of 3 drug initiation, that below phase I DLT principles or phase II disease control rate considerations apply.

Read the detailed description

Phase I Study Design

  • Phase I will follow a 3+3 dose escalation design to determine the RPTD of ixazomib in combination with ONC201 and Dexamethasone.

The dose escalation rules for the phase I portion of the study are as follows, escalating in cohorts of 3 patients per dose level including a de-escalation option in case of early toxicity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as any grade 3 or higher toxicity seen during the first 28 day cycle of the triplet regimen (ONC201, ixazomib, and dexamethasone). Of note, grade 3 and higher absolute lymphopenia and hematologic toxicities without clinical sequelae (eg. neutropenia without fever/infection, anemia without symptoms, thrombocytopenia without bleeding) and also responsive to growth factors/transfusions will not be considered DLTs. AST or ALT values of ≥ 3x ULN AND with serum total bilirubin level of > 2x ULN or international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 without signs of cholestasis and with no other clear alternative reason to explain the observed liver-related laboratory abnormalities is also considered a DLT. Three patients will be treated at the current dose level. If at least 2 patients are observed to have a DLT, the prior dose level is defined as the RPTD unless only 3 patients have been treated at that level, in which case it is the tentative RPTD. If 0 of the 3 patients are observed to have DLT, the dose level is escalated one dose level for the next cohort of 3 patients, and the process continues as above. If exactly 1 of the 3 patients treated show DLT, 3 additional patients are treated at the current dose level. If none of these additional 3 patients show DLT, the dose level is escalated for the next cohort of 3 patients, and the process continues as above; otherwise, the prior dose level is defined as the RPTD (unless only 3 patients have been treated at that level, in which case it is the tentative RPTD). A tentative RPTD becomes final when a total of 6 patients are treated with less than 2 showing DLT.

If, unexpectedly, at least 2 patients are observed to have DLT at the initial dose level 0, then the next dose level evaluated will be the lowest dose level, -2, and further dose escalations to dose level -1 will proceed as outlined above from that dose level. If there is no RPTD declared, there will be no expansion to the phase II portion of the study. The phase I portion of the study will include between 9 and 12 patients depending upon the number of dose levels evaluated.

Phase II Study Design Phase II will follow a Simon's Optimal two-stage design to indicate proof of concept regarding the PFS rate of ixazomib in combination with ONC201 and Dexamethasone at the RPTD established in phase I. Once the RPTD for combination therapy has been established, an additional 24 patients will be enrolled for a total of 30 evaluable patients (24 + 6 from phase I at RPTD).

In considering a Simon's Optimal two-stage design, the plan is to look at each patient at 2 months after initiating study treatment (3 drug combination) and classify each patient as responder or non-responder at the 2 month time point. A responder is a patient who has stable disease or better (not progressed) since initiating study treatment; a non-responder is someone whose disease has progressed according to IMWG criteria. The population of relapsed and refractory MM patients in this study will likely all have progressed on standard therapy; therefore the null hypothesis being tested is that the disease control rate at 2 months is 5%. As per IMWG criteria, if patients show progression after 1 cycle of triplet therapy, they will continue on therapy and a repeat assessment will be performed after cycle 2 in order to confirm progression of disease.

Stage 1:

  • Enroll 9 patients including the 6 patients being evaluated from the phase I portion of the study
  • Evaluate patients at 2 months post initiation of treatment
  • If 0 have responded (progression-free), i.e. if all 9 have progressed, then stop trial for futility and conclude that the proportion who will be progression-free at 2 months is less than 5%.
  • If 1 or more have responded (progression-free) at 2 months, then proceed to Stage 2.

Stage 2:

  • Enroll an additional 21 patients
  • Evaluate patients at 2 months post initiation of treatment If 4 or more of the 30 patients have responded (progression-free) at 2 months then the null hypothesis is rejected and further investigation of this treatment combination is warranted.
02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Relapsed and Refractory
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,760 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 769 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 41 across 3,005 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Ajai Chari is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed Written : Voluntary written consent must be given before performance of any study-related procedure not part of standard medical care
  • Target Population

    1. Symptomatic MM having progressed on 2 prior therapies including proteasome inhibitor (i.e. bortezomib, carfilzomib ixazomib), immunomodulatory drug (i.e., thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide), and daratumumab or other CD38 targeting monoclonal antibody. Proteasome inhibitor patients are eligible. Subjects must not be candidates for treatment regimens known to provide clinical benefit to be eligible for this study.
    2. Male or female patients 18 years or older
    3. (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2.
    4. Patients must have defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements:

    i. Serum M-protein > 0.5 g/dL ii. Urine M-protein > 200 mg/24 hours iii. Serum free light chain assay: involved free light chain level >10 mg/dL (> 100 mg/L) provided the serum free light chain ratio is abnormal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical History and Concurrent Diseases

    1. Peripheral neuropathy > Grade 2 or >Grade 1 with pain on clinical examination during the Screening period.
    2. Significant cardiac disease as determined by the investigator including:

    i. Known or suspected cardiac amyloidosis ii. Congestive heart failure of Class III or IV of the classification iii. Uncontrolled angina, hypertension or arrhythmia iv. Myocardial infarction in the past 6 months v. Any uncontrolled or severe cardiovascular disease vi. > 470 milliseconds (msec) on a 12-lead obtained during the Screening period. If a machine reading is above this value, the ECG should be reviewed by a qualified reader and confirmed on a subsequent ECG.

    c. Known active (defined as most recent serum PCR or hepatitis B surface antigen positive) or active (note, hepatitis C in sustained virologic response defined as negative RNA PCR at least 12 weeks after any therapy is permitted).

    d. Any medical conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, would impose excessive risk to the subject, e.g., any uncontrolled disease, such as pulmonary disease, infection, seizure disorder, uncontrolled hyperglycemia.

    e. Any altered mental status or any psychiatric condition that would interfere with the understanding of the or limit compliance with study requirements.

    f. Prior or concurrent , except for the following: i. Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer ii. Cervical carcinoma in situ iii. Adequately treated Stage I or II cancer from which the subject is currently in complete remission.

iv. Or any other cancer from which the subject has been disease-free for ≥ 3 years g. Diarrhea > Grade 1, based on the grading, in the absence of antidiarrheals.

h. Known GI disease or GI procedure that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of study drug, including difficulty swallowing.

i. Males or females of who do not agree to practice 2 effective methods of , at the same time through 90 days after the last dose of study drug j. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding. k. Diagnosis of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes) syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, myeloproliferative syndrome, or primary amyloidosis (with the exception of patients whose amyloidosis has been documented as a complication of MM, who will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for trial participation).

l. Infection requiring systemic antibiotic therapy or other serious infection within 14 days before study drug administration.

m. Parkinson's disease 4) Physical and Laboratory Test Findings

a. Corrected serum calcium ≥ 14 mg/dl within 2 weeks of enrollment (despite appropriate measure such a short course of , bisphosphonates, hydration, and calcitonin).

b. \< 1000 cells/mm3. No growth factors allowed within 1 week of enrollment.

c. \< 75,000 cell/mm3 (75 x 109/L). Qualifying laboratory value must occur at most recent measurement before enrollment and must be no more than 14 days before enrollment. No transfusions are allowed within 72 hours prior to study drug administration.

d. \< 8 g/dL. Qualifying laboratory value must occur at most recent measurement before enrollment and must be no more than 14 days before enrollment. No transfusions are allowed within 72 hours before qualifying laboratory value e. Serum ≥ 1.5 x , patients with Gilbert's syndrome and a total bilirubin of \< 3 times ULN are permitted) f. or ALT ≥ 3 x ULN. g. \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2. Creatinine clearance is estimated by the formula. (Calculator available at https://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/gfr_calculator.)

  • Prior Therapy or Surgery

    1. Major surgery or radiation therapy within 14 days before study drug administration.
    2. Kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty within 1 week of enrollment.
    3. Administration of chemotherapy, biological, immunotherapy, or agent (therapeutic or diagnostic) within 3 weeks before enrollment (14 days for non-myelosuppressive therapy). Subjects should be 6 weeks from last dose of nitrosourea, nitrogen mustards or monoclonal antibody, 12 weeks from SCT, and 16 weeks from allogeneic SCT.
    4. Corticosteroids use exceeding a cumulative dose of 160 mg of dexamethasone during screening.
    5. If prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, history of moderate to severe chronic (GVHD).
    6. Treatment with plasmapheresis within 4 weeks before enrollment.
    7. NSAIDs, IV contrast, aminoglycosides, or other potentially nephrotoxic drugs within 2 weeks of enrollment.
    8. Current use of a non-standard dialysis membrane.
    9. Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP450 system should not be used on study including but not limited to fluvoxamine, enoxacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, posaconazole, rifampin, rifapentine, rifabutin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, buproprion, fluoxetine, paroxetine, ticlopidine, or St. John's wort within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment. Ixazomib has significant drug-drug interactions with strong inducers. No drug-drug interactions with the CYP450 screen have been found with ONC201, but the analysis of these studies is not complete, so during the study use of inhibitors or inducers of CYP450 system is excluded.
    10. Failure to have fully recovered (i.e., Grade 1 toxicity or less, with the exception of alopecia) from effects of prior chemotherapy regardless of interval since last treatment.
  • Allergies and Adverse Drug Reaction Known to bortezomib, ixazomib, dexamethasone, ONC201
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(28)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

    ONC201, ixazomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Run-in phase of ONC201 and dexamethasone weekly until progression at 4 weeks, lack of response at 8 weeks, or progression followed by the addition of weekly ixazomib.

    Drug: ONC201 · Drug: Ixazomib · Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recommended phase II dose (RPTD)

    of triplet therapy (ixazomib + ONC201+ dexamethasone) following a 3+3 escalation design

    Time frame: 9 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease control rate

    2 month disease control rate defined as the proportion of patients that have stable or better disease after two months of treatment initiation according to IMWG criteria: Stable disease, partial remission, or complete remission

    Time frame: 2 months

  2. Progression free survival (PFS)

    Median Progression free survival for the phase I and II patients treated at the recommended phase II dose. PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to the first occurrence of disease progression or death on study from any cause, whichever occurs earlier.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Duration of response (DOR)

    Median duration of response for the phase I and II patients treated at the recommended phase II dose. DOR is defined as the time from first evidence of PR or better to confirmation of disease progression.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Clinical benefit rate (CBR)

    Clinical benefit rate for the phase I and II patients treated at the recommended phase II dose level. CBR is the combination of the ORR and minimal response (MR) i.e. this includes sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, and MR.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data and safety will be monitored using an internal Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) led by the PI. Other members involved with the review will include sub-Investigators, the myeloma research program manager, and clinical research coordinators. All of these individuals have experience in the routine clinical care as well clinical research and monitoring of subjects with multiple myeloma. A statistician will also be involved with the review.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 21 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 22, 2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
StartActual
Mar 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 14, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 14, 2020
Last update
May 29, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03492138
Lead sponsor
Ajai Chari
Responsible party
Ajai Chari (Associate Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Mar 26, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 14, 2020
Completion
Jan 14, 2020
Last update
May 29, 2020

Study contacts

Ajai Chari, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dordaviprone

Start the discussion