ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03491540PREPACOL2Updated Jan 5, 2024

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Rectal Cancer Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sennosides colonic preparation and Oral Gentamycin in Rectal Cancer Surgery, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-05.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
414
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone Our hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone

Read the detailed description

This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone.

This study's hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been proposed in an attempt to reduce the colonic fecal load and to limit the risk of surgical site contamination, thus theoretically limiting the risk of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). However, the benefit of such MBP before colorectal surgery is related to type of procedure performed. Indeed, several randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses have demonstrated the absence of benefit of MBP before colon cancer surgery, whereas a recent RCT suggested that MBP before rectal cancer surgery was associated to a significant reduction of postoperative SSI, as compare to the absence of preoperative MBP.

Recent studies suggested that the adjunction of oral antibiotics during MBP could help efficiently reduce the risk of postoperative SSI. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis of RCT have suggested that patients preoperatively receiving both MBP and oral antibiotics were exposed to a significantly reduced risk of postoperative SSI, as compared to patients receiving only preoperative MBP. This result was confirmed in a recent RCT which compared preoperative MBP and oral antibiotics versus MBP alone in a heterogeneous population of patients who underwent laparoscopic colonic or rectal surgery. However, to date, no RCT compared the outcomes of an MBP with oral antibiotics to MBP without oral antibiotics in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer Surgery

Keywords

  • Mechanical Bowel Preparation (MBP)
  • Oral antibiotics
  • Rectal cancer surgery
  • Surgical site infection
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 414 is above the median of 200 across 581 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 or more
  • Scheduled to undergo elective restorative laparoscopic cancer of the rectal (\<15 cm from the anal margin) with sphincter preservation
  • With Signed consent
  • And affiliated to the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergent surgery
  • Scheduled total colo-proctectomy
  • Scheduled abdominoperineal restion with definitive colostomy
  • Scheduled associated concomitant resection of another organ (liver, etc.)
  • Active bacterial infection at the time of surgery or recent antibiotic therapy (up to 15 days before surgery)
  • Associated inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients with known colonization with multidrug-resistant enterobacteriacea
  • History of allergy or to the Ornidazole, Gentamycin, X-PREP or to any of the of the drugs used.
  • Cirrhosis of grade B and C ( classification)
  • Myasthenia
  • Allergy to one of the other treatments administered for the purpose of the trial (including betadine)
  • Patient suffering from severe central neurologic diseases, fixed or progressive.
  • Pregnant patients
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
414 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1) " MBP and oral antibiotics " group

    Sennosides colonic preparation Oral Gentamycin Oral Ornidazole

    Drug: Sennosides colonic preparation · Drug: Oral Gentamycin · Drug: Oral Ornidazole

  • Placebo comparator
    2) " MBP alone " group

    Sennosides colonic preparation Oral placebo Gentamycin Oral placebo Ornidazole

    Drug: Sennosides colonic preparation · Drug: Oral Placebo Gentamycin · Drug: Oral Placebo Ornidazole

Interventions

  • DrugSennosides colonic preparation

    Mechanical bowel preparation : Sennosides colonic preparation (X-PREP) 1 per day, on day -2 and day -1

  • Oral gentamycin: Gentamycin 80 mg, 4 per day, on day -2 and day -1; Liquid forms in individual vials

  • Oral ornidazole : Ornidazole 1 g per day (2 tablet per day), on day -2 and day -1; In tablets

  • DrugOral Placebo Gentamycin

    Placebo for oral gentamycin : Same presentation as oral gentamycin x4 per day on day -2 and day -1

  • DrugOral Placebo Ornidazole

    Placebo for oral ornidazole : Same presentation as oral ornidazole 1g per day (2 tablets per day) on day -2 and day -1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative 30-day surgical site infection (SSI).

    SSI will be defined and classified as superficial, deep and/or organ-space infection on the basis of validated and well-defined criteria developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), validated in French by the Comité technique des infections nosocomiales et des infections liées aux soins.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall postoperative morbidity

    Including all postoperative complications occurring within 30 days after surgery, defined and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Severe postoperative morbidity

    Including all complications graded 3 or more according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and occurring within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Postoperative mortality

    Including all deaths occurring within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Postoperative anastomotic leakage

    Defined as the passing of any intra-colonic content (air, liquid, intestinal content, or radiological contrast) through an anastomosis or by an peri-anastomotic abscess, even in the absence of intra-colonic content leak through the anastomosis, observed in drainages, surgical incision, vagina, during a surgical procedure or on a radiological examination, occurring within 90 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Postoperative length of hospital stay

    Calculated from the day of surgery to the day of hospital discharge.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days

  6. Unplanned hospitalization

    Defined as any unplanned hospitalization between surgery and postoperative day 90.

    Time frame: 90 days

  7. Tolerance of the colonic preparation

    Evaluated using a dedicated questionnaire performed the evening before surgery.

    Time frame: The day before surgery

  8. Clostridium difficile colitis occurrence

    Defined as clinical symptoms of clostridium difficile colitis with at least 1 stool sample positive for Clostridium difficile toxin A/B as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Rate of multi-resistant bacteria carriage

    Defined as rate of multi-resistant bacteria carriage

    Time frame: The day before or the day of surgery

  10. Date of adjuvant chemotherapy beginning

    If indicated

    Time frame: 90 days

  11. Temporary stoma closure rate

    Define as temporary stoma closure

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service de chirurgie viscérale, cancérologique / Hôpital Saint-Louis
    Paris, Ile De France 75010, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make IPD available.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 61 months.

Of 38 phase 3 interventional studies under Surgical Wound Infection, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 51. This study's 61 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 9, 2018
First posted
Apr 9, 2018
StartActual
Sep 3, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 23, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 12, 2023
Last update
Jan 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03491540
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2018
Start date
Sep 3, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2023
Completion
Dec 12, 2023
Last update
Jan 5, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Gentamicins · Ornidazole

Start the discussion